Is AI Food a Gimmick or the Future Direction of Food Production?-Predicting Consumers' Willingness to Buy AI Food Based on Cognitive Trust and Affective Trust.

Tiansheng Xia, Xiaoqi Shen, Linli Li
Author Information
  1. Tiansheng Xia: School of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510090, China.
  2. Xiaoqi Shen: School of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510090, China.
  3. Linli Li: School of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510090, China.

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been developing rapidly and has had a broad impact on the food industry, with food produced from AI-generated recipes already appearing to actually go on sale. However, people's trust and willingness to purchase AI food are still unclear. This study builds an integrated theoretical model based on cognitive trust and affective trust, taking into account consumers' quality value orientations, social norms, and perceived risks of AI food, with the aim of predicting and exploring consumers' trust and acceptance of AI food. This study utilized the questionnaire method and 315 questionnaires were collected. The results of structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) indicated that food quality orientation, subjective norms, perceived trust, and affective trust all had a significant positive effect on consumers' purchase intentions. Perceived risk had a negative effect on affective trust and consequently on consumers' purchase intention, but the effect on cognitive trust was not significant. The results also suggest that cognitive trust is the basis of affective trust and that consumer trust and acceptance of AI food can be enhanced by augmenting two antecedents of cognitive trust (food quality orientation and subjective norms). Possible practical implications and insights from the current findings are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Foods. 2024 Mar 14;13(6): [PMID: 38540865]
  2. Nat Food. 2020 Jun;1(6):343-350 [PMID: 37128090]
  3. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e86174 [PMID: 24489695]
  4. Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):1-17 [PMID: 17382433]
  5. Physiol Behav. 2014 Jul;134:126-30 [PMID: 24384369]
  6. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 21;17(20): [PMID: 33096931]
  7. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;37(9):1245-58 [PMID: 21610200]
  8. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61(1):97-115 [PMID: 32003225]
  9. Appetite. 2013 Nov;70:90-8 [PMID: 23831014]
  10. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2012 Mar;640(1):42-57 [PMID: 23243315]
  11. Front Psychol. 2022 May 09;13:903023 [PMID: 35615168]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;18(3): [PMID: 33494321]
  13. Foods. 2023 Dec 22;13(1): [PMID: 38201080]
  14. J Food Sci Technol. 2023 Apr;60(4):1237-1254 [PMID: 36936108]
  15. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Apr;94:102867 [PMID: 36540393]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20): [PMID: 34682476]
  17. Foods. 2022 Apr 18;11(8): [PMID: 35454753]
  18. Appetite. 2007 Sep;49(2):459-66 [PMID: 17442455]

Grants

  1. ZYZX24-023/Smart Medical Innovation Technology Center, GDUT
  2. 20YJC760044/the Young Scholar of Humanity and Social Science Grants from the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
  3. 2018WQNCX022/the Higher Education Young Scholar Innovative Programs of Guangdong Province

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trustfoodAIcognitiveaffectiveconsumers'purchasequalitynormsacceptanceeffectFoodstudyperceivedresultsPLS-SEMorientationsubjectivesignificantconsumerTrustrecentyearsartificialintelligencedevelopingrapidlybroadimpactindustryproducedAI-generatedrecipesalreadyappearingactuallygosaleHoweverpeople'swillingnessstillunclearbuildsintegratedtheoreticalmodelbasedtakingaccountvalueorientationssocialrisksaimpredictingexploringutilizedquestionnairemethod315questionnairescollectedstructuralequationmodelingindicatedpositiveintentionsPerceivedrisknegativeconsequentlyintentionalsosuggestbasiscanenhancedaugmentingtwoantecedentsPossiblepracticalimplicationsinsightscurrentfindingsdiscussedGimmickFutureDirectionProduction?-PredictingConsumers'WillingnessBuyBasedCognitiveAffective

Similar Articles

Cited By