Stimulatory Functions of Male Genitalia in () Alexander and () Doane (Diptera: Tipulidae) and Implications for Theories of Genital Evolution.

William G Eberhard, Jon K Gelhaus
Author Information
  1. William G Eberhard: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, Ciudad Universitaria, Costa Rica, and Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
  2. Jon K Gelhaus: Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The Academy of Natural Sciences, Drexel University, 1900 Ben Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103-1195, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Male genitalia have been hypothesized to function as courtship devices during copulation, but it is difficult to use behavioral observations to test this hypothesis because male genitalia are usually hidden inside the female during copulation. In tipuloid flies, however, nearly all of the male's complex genital structures remain outside the female. Copulation behavior and genital morphology in () and . () suggest that some male genital structures function to stimulate the female: male structures that contact the female bear tufts or dense arrays of modified setae on precisely the surfaces that contact the female; contact involves repeated, stereotyped rhythmic movements that include brushing, vibrating, scraping, and tapping; the movements are appropriately designed to utilize the morphology of the modified setae to stimulate the female; and the movements have little or no other perceptible mechanical effects on the female. The female structures contacted by these male genital movements fail to show the defensive designs predicted by the theories of genital evolution that are based on morphological species isolation or male-female morphological conflicts of interest; also unexplained by the conflict of interest hypothesis are female movements that seem designed to increase rather than avoid stimulation by the male.

Keywords

References

  1. Evolution. 1994 Jun;48(3):711-733 [PMID: 28568272]
  2. J Exp Biol. 2018 Apr 20;221(Pt 8): [PMID: 29559546]
  3. Rev Biol Trop. 2006 Sep;54(3):829-42 [PMID: 18491623]
  4. PLoS Biol. 2014 May 06;12(5):e1001851 [PMID: 24802812]
  5. Genetica. 2010 Jan;138(1):5-18 [PMID: 19308664]
  6. Curr Biol. 2021 Feb 8;31(3):R110-R116 [PMID: 33561404]
  7. J Evol Biol. 2019 Sep;32(9):882-899 [PMID: 31267594]
  8. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Feb;19(2):87-93 [PMID: 16701234]
  9. Nature. 2000 Oct 19;407(6806):855-6 [PMID: 11057654]
  10. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Sep;92(2):135-8 [PMID: 18854219]
  11. Evolution. 1992 Dec;46(6):1774-1783 [PMID: 28567773]
  12. Int J Evol Biol. 2012;2012:247352 [PMID: 22263116]
  13. Biol Open. 2017 Jul 15;6(7):1008-1012 [PMID: 28583926]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0femalegenitalmalemovementsstructurescontactMalegenitaliafunctioncopulationhypothesisbehaviormorphologystimulatemodifiedsetaedesignedevolutionmorphologicalspeciesisolationinteresthypothesizedcourtshipdevicesdifficultusebehavioralobservationstestusuallyhiddeninsidetipuloidflieshowevernearlymale'scomplexremainoutsideCopulationsuggestfemale:beartuftsdensearrayspreciselysurfacesinvolvesrepeatedstereotypedrhythmicincludebrushingvibratingscrapingtappingappropriatelyutilizelittleperceptiblemechanicaleffectscontactedfailshowdefensivedesignspredictedtheoriesbasedmale-femaleconflictsalsounexplainedconflictseemincreaseratheravoidstimulationStimulatoryFunctionsGenitaliaAlexanderDoaneDiptera:TipulidaeImplicationsTheoriesGenitalEvolutioncrypticchoicelock-and-keyrapiddivergentsexualselectionsexuallyantagonisticcoevolution

Similar Articles

Cited By