Association between beliefs in medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors among medical and healthcare students. Implications for professional practice.

Jan Domaradzki, Piotr Jabkowski, Dariusz Walkowiak
Author Information
  1. Jan Domaradzki: Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. jandomar@ump.edu.pl. ORCID
  2. Piotr Jabkowski: Faculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland. ORCID
  3. Dariusz Walkowiak: Department of Organization and Management in Health Care, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While conspiracy theories cover many different themes, medical conspiracy theories (MCTs) have become particularly prevalent in modern societies. As beliefs in MCTs can become a source of "infodemics", influence individual health behaviors and cause distrust in medical institutions and personnel, healthcare workers must find ways to overturn patients' conspiracy thinking. However, as the medical world is not free of these beliefs, in this study, we investigated beliefs in MCTs among medical and health science students and their association with reported health behaviors.
METHODS: Our sample was derived from a self-administered, anonymized, computer-assisted web survey conducted among 1,175 medical and health science students enrolled at the Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland.
RESULTS: From a set of twenty different MCTs, one-third of students rejected all of them, 18% believed in one, 15% in two, 10% in three, and 24% supported four or more conspiracy theories. In addition, many students were hesitant or unsure about MCTs. We also found that nursing and midwifery students were the most likely to believe in MCTs, while medical and dental students were the least supportive. Support for MCTs was higher among students in the early years of their studies and who declared themselves religious and conservative. This study also highlights the association between students' support for MCTs and their reported health behaviors, including avoiding vaccinations, using alternative medicine, taking vitamin C, or using social media as an essential source of health information.
CONCLUSIONS: As medical and health science students are prone to conspiratorial thinking, they should be trained to act as a trusted and reliable source of medical information, to mitigate conspiratorial beliefs, and to act as role models for their patients and society, effectively shaping health behaviors in the population.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Rep. 2023 Aug;126(4):1784-1802 [PMID: 35324351]
  2. JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):208-210 [PMID: 33377900]
  3. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jun;271(4):591-593 [PMID: 33942147]
  4. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2009 Dec;39(4):290-1 [PMID: 21152462]
  5. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec;19(4):403-407 [PMID: 29398935]
  6. AIDS Behav. 2012 Apr;16(3):761-73 [PMID: 21538083]
  7. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Aug;9(8):1763-73 [PMID: 23584253]
  8. Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):572-85 [PMID: 25217762]
  9. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Aug;24(8):573-577 [PMID: 33395548]
  10. J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Sep 22;43(3):445-449 [PMID: 33367857]
  11. JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 2;7:e41925 [PMID: 37068055]
  12. EMBO Rep. 2018 Apr;19(4): [PMID: 29491005]
  13. Transl Behav Med. 2020 Oct 8;10(4):850-856 [PMID: 32910819]
  14. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 20;22(1):299 [PMID: 35443661]
  15. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Mar;41(3):342-4 [PMID: 16540935]
  16. Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):1559-69 [PMID: 26066938]
  17. Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 Jul 12;6(1):23 [PMID: 34253254]
  18. R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Oct 14;7(10):201199 [PMID: 33204475]
  19. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2022 Feb;14(1):311-328 [PMID: 34435446]
  20. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(7-8):1615-1627 [PMID: 30633623]
  21. Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 15;12(1):21672 [PMID: 36522383]
  22. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):2025733 [PMID: 35113775]
  23. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):817-8 [PMID: 24638266]
  24. BMJ. 2021 Apr 27;373:n1052 [PMID: 33906903]
  25. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;10(4): [PMID: 35455284]
  26. J Comput Soc Sci. 2020;3(2):279-317 [PMID: 33134595]
  27. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Oct;47:101352 [PMID: 35644093]
  28. Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;10:914462 [PMID: 36091530]
  29. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;10(4): [PMID: 35455277]
  30. Vaccine. 2022 May 31;40(25):3413-3432 [PMID: 35534309]
  31. Vaccine. 2016 Dec 20;34(52):6700-6706 [PMID: 27810314]
  32. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 23;8(2): [PMID: 36828497]
  33. Med J Aust. 2022 May 2;216(8):381-384 [PMID: 35430740]
  34. Health Commun. 2021 Oct;36(11):1343-1353 [PMID: 32312084]
  35. Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Sep;23(3):505-518 [PMID: 32301040]
  36. BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;21(1):684 [PMID: 33832446]
  37. Vaccine. 2014 Apr 17;32(19):2150-9 [PMID: 24598724]
  38. Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 06;14:1164725 [PMID: 37484083]
  39. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2016 May-Aug;29(2):107-12 [PMID: 27549647]
  40. BMJ. 2002 Aug 24;325(7361):430-2 [PMID: 12193361]
  41. PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276082 [PMID: 36288357]
  42. Public Underst Sci. 2021 Nov;30(8):977-992 [PMID: 33663279]
  43. Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(6):2514-2521 [PMID: 34641992]
  44. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;221:1-8 [PMID: 30553118]
  45. Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jul;328:115979 [PMID: 37245261]
  46. Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2172199 [PMID: 36749932]
  47. J Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(2):219-228 [PMID: 27257264]
  48. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):875 [PMID: 32687807]
  49. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 Nov 24;24:e65 [PMID: 37997437]
  50. PLoS One. 2022 Jul 20;17(7):e0270429 [PMID: 35857743]
  51. J Travel Med. 2020 May 18;27(3): [PMID: 32125413]
  52. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1270-1285 [PMID: 32864837]
  53. BMJ. 2022 Dec 21;379:e072561 [PMID: 36543351]
  54. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2017 Jan-Feb;31(1):50-58 [PMID: 28163371]
  55. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 24;17(12): [PMID: 32599943]
  56. J Psychosom Res. 2017 Aug;99:89-94 [PMID: 28712435]
  57. Acad Med. 2001 Jun;76(6):598-605 [PMID: 11401802]
  58. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Nov;65(11):1178-1187 [PMID: 36205755]
  59. Psychol Med. 2021 Jul;51(10):1763-1769 [PMID: 32513320]
  60. Scand J Psychol. 2017 Oct;58(5):422-428 [PMID: 28782805]
  61. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;51(6):969-989 [PMID: 34518709]
  62. Cureus. 2018 Oct 27;10(10):e3502 [PMID: 30648043]
  63. Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 23;13(1):18116 [PMID: 37872233]
  64. Psychol Belg. 2022 May 17;62(1):193-207 [PMID: 35633849]
  65. GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Nov 15;38(7):Doc115 [PMID: 34957320]
  66. Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Mar;6(3):392-403 [PMID: 35039654]
  67. Mem Stud. 2017 Jul;10(3):323-333 [PMID: 29081831]

MeSH Term

Humans
Students, Medical
Health Behavior
Female
Male
Students, Health Occupations
Adult
Young Adult
Surveys and Questionnaires
Poland
Professional Practice
Attitude of Health Personnel

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0medicalstudentshealthMCTsconspiracybehaviorstheoriesbeliefsamongsourcehealthcarescienceMedicalmanydifferentbecomeworkersthinkingstudyassociationreportedalsousinginformationconspiratorialactBACKGROUND:coverthemesparticularlyprevalentmodernsocietiescan"infodemics"influenceindividualcausedistrustinstitutionspersonnelmustfindwaysoverturnpatients'HoweverworldfreeinvestigatedMETHODS:samplederivedself-administeredanonymizedcomputer-assistedwebsurveyconducted1175enrolledPoznanUniversitySciencesPolandRESULTS:settwentyone-thirdrejected18%believedone15%two10%three24%supportedfouradditionhesitantunsurefoundnursingmidwiferylikelybelievedentalleastsupportiveSupporthigherearlyyearsstudiesdeclaredreligiousconservativehighlightsstudents'supportincludingavoidingvaccinationsalternativemedicinetakingvitaminCsocialmediaessentialCONCLUSIONS:pronetrainedtrustedreliablemitigaterolemodelspatientssocietyeffectivelyshapingpopulationAssociationImplicationsprofessionalpracticeAttitudesFutureHealth

Similar Articles

Cited By