High-intensity interval training vs. yoga in improving binge eating and physical fitness in inactive young females.

Hong-Mei Li, Chen-Jun Liu, Yi-Hao Shen, Li Zhao, Cheng-Qian Yin, Ji-Guo Yu, Shan-Shan Mao
Author Information
  1. Hong-Mei Li: Key Laboratory of Exercise and Physical Fitness, Ministry of Education, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.
  2. Chen-Jun Liu: School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.
  3. Yi-Hao Shen: School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.
  4. Li Zhao: Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Performance and Skill Assessment, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.
  5. Cheng-Qian Yin: Department of Interventional Center of Valvular Heart Disease, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Disease, Beijing, 100029, China. chq_yin@aliyun.com.
  6. Ji-Guo Yu: Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Performance and Skill Assessment, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China. jiguo.yu@umu.se.
  7. Shan-Shan Mao: School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China. ss.mao@bsu.edu.cn.

Abstract

Yoga is effective in binge eating disorder (BED) treatment, but it does not seem effective enough to improve low physical fitness. In contrast, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is effective in improving physical fitness but has never been studied in the context of BED. In the study, 47 young inactive females with mild to moderate BED were recruited and randomly assigned to a HIIT group (HIIT), a Yoga group (YG), or a control group (CG; age, 19.47 ± 0.74, 19.69 ± 0.874, and 19.44 ± 0.63 years; BMI, 21.07 ± 1.66, 21.95 ± 2.67, and 20.68 ± 2.61 kg/m, respectively). The intervention groups participated in 8-week specific exercises, while the CG maintained their usual daily activity. Before and after the training, participants were evaluated for BED using the binge eating scale (BES) and for physical fitness. The obtained data were compared within groups and between groups, and a correlation analysis between BES and physical fitness parameters was performed. After the training, the YG presented significant improvements in BES (- 20.25%, p = 0.006, η = 0.408), fat mass (FM, - 3.13%, p = 0.033, η = 0.269), and maximal oxygen consumption (VOmax, 11.51%, p = 0.000, η = 0.601), whereas the HIIT showed significant improvements in body weight (BW, - 1.78%, p = 0.006, η = 0.433), FM (- 3.94%, p = 0.033, η = 0.285), and BMI (- 1.80%, p = 0.006, η = 0.428), but not in BES. Comparisons between groups revealed that both HIIT and YG had significantly higher VOmax levels than CG (HIIT 12.82%, p = 0.006, η = 0.088; YG: 11.90%, p = 0.009, η = 0.088) with no difference between HIIT and YG. Additionally, YG presented significantly lower BES than both HIIT (15.45%, p = 0.02, η = 0.03) and CG (11.91%, p = 0.022, η = 0.03). In conclusion, Yoga is an effective treatment for BED, but HIIT is not, despite its high efficacy in improving physical fitness.

Keywords

References

  1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Jun;56(3):433-9 [PMID: 3397436]
  2. Diseases. 2022 Sep 29;10(4): [PMID: 36278570]
  3. Eat Weight Disord. 2015 Mar;20(1):1-12 [PMID: 25571885]
  4. Complement Ther Med. 2009 Aug;17(4):196-202 [PMID: 19632546]
  5. J Sports Sci. 2021 Aug;39(15):1677-1686 [PMID: 33634738]
  6. Eat Disord. 2020 Jul-Aug;28(4):400-437 [PMID: 32964814]
  7. Psychosom Med. 2016 May;78(4):465-73 [PMID: 26867081]
  8. Nutrients. 2020 Nov 25;12(12): [PMID: 33255753]
  9. Complement Ther Med. 2022 Jun;66:102820 [PMID: 35218906]
  10. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Apr 5;16(1):33 [PMID: 30953508]
  11. Appetite. 2021 Mar 1;158:105021 [PMID: 33161045]
  12. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2012;34(2):87-92 [PMID: 25922927]
  13. Med Clin North Am. 2019 Jul;103(4):669-680 [PMID: 31078199]
  14. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2023 Jul;55(7):523-530 [PMID: 37245147]
  15. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Jun;17(6):1220-5 [PMID: 19282821]
  16. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010502 [PMID: 33380887]
  17. Diseases. 2022 Dec 21;11(1): [PMID: 36648866]
  18. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Nov;47(11):2441-9 [PMID: 25899101]
  19. J Complement Integr Med. 2019 Feb 7;16(1): [PMID: 30735481]
  20. Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 18;9:702793 [PMID: 34733813]
  21. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78 Suppl 1:3-8 [PMID: 28125172]
  22. J Eat Disord. 2022 Aug 24;10(1):125 [PMID: 36002838]
  23. J Obes. 2012;2012:407103 [PMID: 22778917]
  24. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Feb 22;170(4):321-31 [PMID: 20177034]
  25. J Physiol. 2017 May 1;595(9):2915-2930 [PMID: 27748956]
  26. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Jun;15(6):e008243 [PMID: 35477256]
  27. Sports (Basel). 2022 Apr 22;10(5): [PMID: 35622474]
  28. J Adolesc Health. 2010 Apr;46(4):346-51 [PMID: 20307823]
  29. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 12;17(1):180 [PMID: 28494809]
  30. Diseases. 2022 Nov 17;10(4): [PMID: 36412601]
  31. Nutrients. 2020 Mar 21;12(3): [PMID: 32245173]
  32. Nutrients. 2020 Nov 29;12(12): [PMID: 33260423]
  33. Appetite. 2017 Feb 1;109:165-171 [PMID: 27899295]
  34. Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1095328 [PMID: 36743598]
  35. Sports Med Open. 2023 Jan 15;9(1):5 [PMID: 36641767]
  36. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017 May;25(3):165-171 [PMID: 28127825]
  37. Sports Med. 2024 Jan;54(1):127-167 [PMID: 37676620]
  38. Addict Behav. 1982;7(1):47-55 [PMID: 7080884]
  39. Complement Ther Med. 2019 Oct;46:73-80 [PMID: 31519291]
  40. Eat Disord. 2020 Jul-Aug;28(4):438-457 [PMID: 32182190]
  41. Physiol Behav. 2023 Oct 1;269:114267 [PMID: 37302642]
  42. J Hypertens. 2015 Nov;33(11):2239-44 [PMID: 26372317]

Grants

  1. 2015YB001/Chinese Universities Scientific Fund
  2. 2024JNPD001/Chinese Universities Scientific Fund
  3. 2022YFC3600201/National Key R&D Program of China

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Yoga
Physical Fitness
High-Intensity Interval Training
Young Adult
Binge-Eating Disorder
Adult
Adolescent
Sedentary Behavior
Body Mass Index
Bulimia

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0p = 0η = 0HIITfitnessphysicalBEDtrainingYGBESYogaeffectiveeatingCGgroups006bingeintervalimprovinginactivefemalesgroup1911disordertreatmentyoungBMI21presentedsignificantimprovementsFM- 3033VOmax- 1significantly08803High-intensityseemenoughimprovelowcontrasthigh-intensityneverstudiedcontextstudy47mildmoderaterecruitedrandomlyassignedcontrolage47 ± 07469 ± 087444 ± 063 years07 ± 16695 ± 2672068 ± 261 kg/mrespectivelyinterventionparticipated8-weekspecificexercisesmaintainedusualdailyactivityparticipantsevaluatedusingscaleobtaineddatacomparedwithincorrelationanalysisparametersperformed- 2025%408fatmass13%269maximaloxygenconsumption51%000601whereasshowedbodyweightBW78%43394%28580%428Comparisonsrevealedhigherlevels1282%YG:90%009differenceAdditionallylower1545%0291%022conclusiondespitehighefficacyvsyogaBingePhysicalYoung

Similar Articles

Cited By