Impacts of resident physician unionization on house staff compensation.

Sidharth Tyagi, Rema J Shah, Joshua Huttler, Jehanzeb Kayani, Mohammad-Reza Ghovanloo, Philip R Effraim
Author Information
  1. Sidharth Tyagi: Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America. ORCID
  2. Rema J Shah: Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
  3. Joshua Huttler: Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America. ORCID
  4. Jehanzeb Kayani: Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America.
  5. Mohammad-Reza Ghovanloo: Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America. ORCID
  6. Philip R Effraim: Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians-in-training in the United States work long hours for relatively low wages. In response to increased economic burden, the popularity of unionization in residency training programs has increased dramatically. In this study, we conducted a cross-sectional investigation of the association between unionization status and Internal Medicine PGY-1 compensation and benefits.
METHODS AND FINDINGS: We compiled residency salary and benefits data from all Internal Medicine residency training programs in the United States. Using a mixed effects modeling approach, we evaluated the differences in salary and total compensation while adjusting for regional factors and cost-of-living differences. In aggregate, PGY-1 salary was higher for unionized vs. non-unionized programs ($69648 vs. $62214; [95% CI 670.7-3563.7]). However, there was no difference after adjusting for cost-of-living ($62515 vs $62475; [95% CI. -1317.5, 1299.7]). Unionized programs do however offer greater monetary benefits in the form of stipend disbursements, and total compensation is higher in unionized vs. non-unionized residency programs ($65887 vs $63515; [95% CI 607.6, 3551.5]).
CONCLUSIONS: Unionized residency programs offer higher total compensation packages than their non-unionized counterparts. This increase in compensation is driven in large part by an increased variety and amount of stipend disbursement.

References

  1. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123412 [PMID: 34468754]
  2. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2320455 [PMID: 37368404]
  3. JAMA. 2023 Nov 21;330(19):1905-1906 [PMID: 37883076]

MeSH Term

Internship and Residency
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Humans
Labor Unions
United States
Physicians
Cross-Sectional Studies
Internal Medicine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0programscompensationresidencyvsincreasedunionizationbenefitssalarytotalhighernon-unionized[95%CIUnitedStatestrainingInternalMedicinePGY-1differencesadjustingcost-of-livingunionized7]UnionizedofferstipendBACKGROUND:Physicians-in-trainingworklonghoursrelativelylowwagesresponseeconomicburdenpopularitydramaticallystudyconductedcross-sectionalinvestigationassociationstatusMETHODSANDFINDINGS:compileddataUsingmixedeffectsmodelingapproachevaluatedregionalfactorsaggregate$69648$622146707-3563Howeverdifference$62515$62475-131751299howevergreatermonetaryformdisbursements$65887$63515607635515]CONCLUSIONS:packagescounterpartsincreasedrivenlargepartvarietyamountdisbursementImpactsresidentphysicianhousestaff

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.