Validity and reliability of the Sustainable HEalthy Diet (SHED) index by comparison with EAT-Lancet diet, Mediterranean diet in Turkish adults.

Burcu Aksoy Canyolu, Daniela Martini, Nilüfer Şen
Author Information
  1. Burcu Aksoy Canyolu: Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  2. Daniela Martini: Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  3. Nilüfer Şen: Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

Abstract

Background: Food consumption and diet are strongly associated with sustainability. The Sustainable HEalthy Diet index was developed to measure the nutritional, environmental, and sociocultural components of sustainable diets and healthy eating patterns. However, a methodological approach has yet to be proposed for Turkish adults. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the SHED index in Turkish adults.
Methods: Data were collected from 558 healthy adults using a web-based questionnaire. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and repeatability was evaluated using the test-retest method. Construct validity was investigated using the EAT-Lancet diet and the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), and the adapted SHED index structures' accordance was evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis.
Results: Good reliability and repeatability were found (r = 0.758 and 0.795, respectively). A higher SHED index score was related to a greater intake of grains, fruits, and vegetables and a lower intake of meat, eggs, and dairy compared to EAT-Lancet diet food groups. A higher SHED index score was associated with a lower saturated fat and added sugar intake. While the SHED index was associated with greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet (r = 0.334, < 0.001), it was negatively associated with non-alcoholic and diet non-alcoholic beverage consumption (r = -0.257 and -0.264, respectively; < 0.001).
Conclusion: The SHED index showed good validity and reliability in Turkish adults. Our results suggest that the SHED index can be used in epidemiological and intervention studies because it allows the measurement of diets in terms of health and sustainability to propose adaptations accordingly.

Keywords

References

  1. Mo Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;117(6):536-538 [PMID: 33311784]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2599-608 [PMID: 12826634]
  3. Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):2927-2935 [PMID: 37721220]
  4. Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;41(2):377-85 [PMID: 21172932]
  5. Nutrients. 2020 Mar 11;12(3): [PMID: 32168838]
  6. Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Oct;2(10):e425-e426 [PMID: 30318099]
  7. Nutrients. 2019 Jan 05;11(1): [PMID: 30621258]
  8. Front Nutr. 2022 May 19;9:870883 [PMID: 35662947]
  9. Front Nutr. 2019 Apr 12;6:39 [PMID: 31032257]
  10. Front Nutr. 2023 Apr 12;10:1158155 [PMID: 37125040]
  11. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2012 Mar;63(2):138-44 [PMID: 21854108]
  12. Nutrients. 2023 Jan 28;15(3): [PMID: 36771368]
  13. Nutrients. 2019 Aug 05;11(8): [PMID: 31387226]
  14. Public Health Nutr. 2017 May;20(7):1322-1330 [PMID: 28003037]
  15. Int J Environ Health Res. 2023 Apr;33(4):430-440 [PMID: 36726049]
  16. Sci Data. 2019 Nov 25;6(1):279 [PMID: 31767866]
  17. Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972 [PMID: 30954305]
  18. Adv Nutr. 2014 Jul 14;5(4):418-29 [PMID: 25022991]
  19. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63 [PMID: 27330520]
  20. Lancet. 2013 Feb 16;381(9866):566-74 [PMID: 23410606]
  21. Nutrients. 2022 Feb 22;14(5): [PMID: 35267904]
  22. Foods. 2021 Mar 08;10(3): [PMID: 33800396]
  23. Eur J Nutr. 2021 Oct;60(7):3897-3909 [PMID: 33904997]
  24. Br J Nutr. 2022 Aug 08;:1-20 [PMID: 35938236]
  25. Nutrients. 2023 Dec 12;15(24): [PMID: 38140330]
  26. PLoS One. 2023 Dec 20;18(12):e0296026 [PMID: 38117768]
  27. Adv Nutr. 2016 Jul 15;7(4):641-64 [PMID: 27422501]
  28. J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Jul;102(9):3724-3729 [PMID: 34907547]
  29. Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Nov;5(11):e786-e796 [PMID: 34688354]
  30. Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492 [PMID: 30660336]
  31. Lancet Planet Health. 2024 Jun;8(6):e391-e401 [PMID: 38849181]

MeSH Term

Humans
Diet, Mediterranean
Turkey
Male
Female
Adult
Reproducibility of Results
Diet, Healthy
Middle Aged
Surveys and Questionnaires
Feeding Behavior
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0indexdietSHEDDietadultsreliability0associatedTurkishusingEAT-LancetSustainabledietsvalidityevaluatedMediterraneanr=intakeconsumptionsustainabilityHEalthyhealthyrepeatabilityrespectivelyhigherscoregreaterlower<001non-alcoholic-0ValidityBackground:FoodstronglydevelopedmeasurenutritionalenvironmentalsocioculturalcomponentssustainableeatingpatternsHowevermethodologicalapproachyetproposedstudyaimeddetermineMethods:Datacollected558web-basedquestionnaireInternalconsistencyCronbach'salphacoefficienttest-retestmethodConstructinvestigatedAdherenceScreenerMEDASadaptedstructures'accordanceconfirmatoryfactoranalysisResults:Goodfound758795relatedgrainsfruitsvegetablesmeateggsdairycomparedfoodgroupssaturatedfataddedsugaradherence334negativelybeverage257264Conclusion:showedgoodresultssuggestcanusedepidemiologicalinterventionstudiesallowsmeasurementtermshealthproposeadaptationsaccordinglycomparisonindexesquality

Similar Articles

Cited By