Comprehensive Analysis of scRNA-Seq and Bulk RNA-Seq Reveals Transcriptional Signatures of Macrophages in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.

Mi Tang, Liling Xiong, Jianghui Cai, Xuejia Gong, Li Fan, Xiaoyu Zhou, Shasha Xing, Xiao Yang
Author Information
  1. Mi Tang: Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, People's Republic of China.
  2. Liling Xiong: Obstetrics Department, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, People's Republic of China.
  3. Jianghui Cai: School of medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
  4. Xuejia Gong: School of medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
  5. Li Fan: Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  6. Xiaoyu Zhou: Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, People's Republic of China.
  7. Shasha Xing: Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, People's Republic of China.
  8. Xiao Yang: Obstetrics Department, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, People's Republic of China. ORCID

Abstract

Purpose: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a disorder that characterized by maternal pruritus, abnormal liver function, and an elevation in total bile acid concentrations during pregnancy. Immune factors have been recognized as playing a vital role in the mechanism of ICP. However, the underlying mechanisms regulating dysfunctional immune cells and immune genes remain to be fully elucidated.
Patients and Methods: Single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk RNA sequencing data of the placenta were downloaded from the SRA database. The AUCell package, Monocle package and SCENIC package were utilized to explored immune cell activity, cell trajectory and transcription factor, respectively. GO, KEGG, and GSEA were employed to explore potential biological mechanisms. Cell-cell communications were further investigated using the CellChat package. RT-PCR, and Western blot were used to verify the gene expression in placenta.
Results: In placenta cells, macrophages were found to be significantly increased in ICP. Additionally, macrophages exhibited the highest immune gene score and were divided into four subclusters (MF1-4). Our analysis revealed significant elevations in MF2, associated with LPS response and antigen presentation, and MF4, associated with TNF and cytokine production. MF3 displayed an anti-inflammatory phenotype. MF1, closely related to ribosomes and proteins, exhibited a sharp decrease. Although ICP maintained an anti-inflammatory state, macrophage trajectories showed a gradual progression toward inflammation. Subsequently, we confirmed that cytokine- and chemokine-related signaling pathways were emphasized in macrophages. Within the CXCL signaling pathway, the increased expression of CXCL1 in macrophages can interact with CXCR2 in neutrophils, potentially inducing macrophage infiltration, stimulating neutrophil chemotaxis, and leading to an inflammatory response and cellular damage.
Conclusion: In conclusion, we firstly revealed the transcriptional signatures of macrophages in ICP and discovered a tendency toward an inflammatory state. This study also provides new evidence that the CXCL1-CXCR2 axis may play an important role in the pathogenesis of ICP.

Keywords

References

  1. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995;6(2):109-18 [PMID: 7548618]
  2. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May 30;2021:6679322 [PMID: 34195157]
  3. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7731):347-353 [PMID: 30429548]
  4. Am J Pathol. 2010 Aug;177(2):1017-30 [PMID: 20558572]
  5. Nat Methods. 2017 Oct;14(10):979-982 [PMID: 28825705]
  6. J Reprod Immunol. 2015 Nov;112:73-80 [PMID: 26340023]
  7. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010 Jun;63(6):460-71 [PMID: 20163399]
  8. Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 17;12(1):1088 [PMID: 33597522]
  9. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016;12(1):39-48 [PMID: 26469633]
  10. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e87343 [PMID: 24489901]
  11. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2021 Jun;225(3):238-243 [PMID: 32942322]
  12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Sep;180:12-5 [PMID: 24997423]
  13. Cell Mol Immunol. 2007 Feb;4(1):71-5 [PMID: 17349214]
  14. PLoS One. 2008 Apr 30;3(4):e2078 [PMID: 18446208]
  15. Front Immunol. 2022 Jun 24;13:883971 [PMID: 35812382]
  16. OMICS. 2012 May;16(5):284-7 [PMID: 22455463]
  17. BMC Med Genomics. 2014 Jul 07;7:42 [PMID: 25001852]
  18. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Apr;31(7):901-906 [PMID: 28298162]
  19. Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2263-74 [PMID: 26307092]
  20. Nat Methods. 2017 Nov;14(11):1083-1086 [PMID: 28991892]
  21. Trends Immunol. 2004 Dec;25(12):677-86 [PMID: 15530839]
  22. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001 Nov;281(5):G1188-95 [PMID: 11668027]
  23. Sci Adv. 2018 Oct 31;4(10):eaau4788 [PMID: 30402542]
  24. J Reprod Immunol. 2012 Sep;95(1-2):1-14 [PMID: 22819759]
  25. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2003 Jun;49(1):1-13 [PMID: 14603947]
  26. J Perinat Med. 2015 Nov;43(6):667-74 [PMID: 25294714]
  27. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2010 Mar;35(3):241-6 [PMID: 20360645]
  28. J Leukoc Biol. 2000 Jul;68(1):1-8 [PMID: 10914483]
  29. Hepatology. 2003 Aug;38(2):355-63 [PMID: 12883479]
  30. Cell Res. 2018 Aug;28(8):819-832 [PMID: 30042384]
  31. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 16;14:7 [PMID: 23323831]
  32. Front Immunol. 2017 Feb 09;8:120 [PMID: 28232836]
  33. Cell. 2018 Aug 9;174(4):982-998.e20 [PMID: 29909982]
  34. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Sep;37(9):516-8 [PMID: 12411008]
  35. J Hepatol. 2015 Aug;63(2):456-61 [PMID: 25772037]
  36. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Mar;29(6):977-81 [PMID: 25845273]
  37. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1978;67(6):206-9 [PMID: 369450]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ICPimmunemacrophagespackagepregnancyplacentagenemacrophageIntrahepaticcholestasisrolemechanismscellsRNAsequencingbulkcellexpressionincreasedexhibitedrevealedassociatedresponseanti-inflammatorystatetowardsignalinginflammatoryscRNA-SeqRNA-SeqPurpose:disordercharacterizedmaternalpruritusabnormalliverfunctionelevationtotalbileacidconcentrationsImmunefactorsrecognizedplayingvitalmechanismHoweverunderlyingregulatingdysfunctionalgenesremainfullyelucidatedPatientsMethods:Single-celldatadownloadedSRAdatabaseAUCellMonocleSCENICutilizedexploredactivitytrajectorytranscriptionfactorrespectivelyGOKEGGGSEAemployedexplorepotentialbiologicalCell-cellcommunicationsinvestigatedusingCellChatRT-PCRWesternblotusedverifyResults:foundsignificantlyAdditionallyhighestscoredividedfoursubclustersMF1-4analysissignificantelevationsMF2LPSantigenpresentationMF4TNFcytokineproductionMF3displayedphenotypeMF1closelyrelatedribosomesproteinssharpdecreaseAlthoughmaintainedtrajectoriesshowedgradualprogressioninflammationSubsequentlyconfirmedcytokine-chemokine-relatedpathwaysemphasizedWithinCXCLpathwayCXCL1caninteractCXCR2neutrophilspotentiallyinducinginfiltrationstimulatingneutrophilchemotaxisleadingcellulardamageConclusion:conclusionfirstlytranscriptionalsignaturesdiscoveredtendencystudyalsoprovidesnewevidenceCXCL1-CXCR2axismayplayimportantpathogenesisComprehensiveAnalysisBulkRevealsTranscriptionalSignaturesMacrophagesCholestasisPregnancyintrahepatic

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.