Embeddedness of Earth's gravity in visual perception.

Abdul-Rahim Deeb, Fulvio Domini
Author Information
  1. Abdul-Rahim Deeb: Department of Psychological Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  2. Fulvio Domini: Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Abstract

Falling objects are commonplace in daily life, requiring precise perceptual judgments for interception and avoidance. We argue that human judgments of projectile motion arise from the interplay between sensory information and predictions constrained by Newtonian mechanics. Our study investigates how individuals perceive falling objects under various gravitational conditions, aiming to understand the role of internalized gravity in visual perception. Through meticulously controlling the available information, we demonstrated that these phenomena cannot be explained solely by simple heuristics nor representational momentum. Instead, we found that the perceptual judgments of humans (n = 11, 13, 14, and 11, respectively, in Experiments 1, 2, 3, and 4) are influenced by a combination of sensory information and gravity predictions, highlighting the role of internalized physical constraints in the perception of projectile motion.

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Dec;117(4):395-407 [PMID: 2974864]
  2. Percept Psychophys. 1983 Jun;33(6):575-81 [PMID: 6622194]
  3. Nature. 1994 Jul 28;370(6487):256-7 [PMID: 8035873]
  4. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun;36(3):729-50 [PMID: 20515200]
  5. Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):377-86 [PMID: 24406395]
  6. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986 Jun;115(2):175-88 [PMID: 2940315]
  7. Science. 1987 Sep 11;237(4820):1317-23 [PMID: 3629243]
  8. Psychol Sci. 2021 Feb;32(2):280-291 [PMID: 33472012]
  9. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):693-4 [PMID: 11426224]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 19;105(33):12087-92 [PMID: 18697948]
  11. Hum Mov Sci. 2009 Apr;28(2):236-49 [PMID: 19110332]
  12. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Jan;21(1):241-54 [PMID: 7876772]
  13. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Feb;32(1):139-48 [PMID: 16478332]
  14. Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(3):389-412 [PMID: 7892735]
  15. Mem Cognit. 1993 Jul;21(4):449-57 [PMID: 8350736]
  16. J Vis. 2009 Dec 14;9(13):14.1-8 [PMID: 20055547]
  17. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2017 Apr;23(4):1399-1408 [PMID: 28129174]
  18. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Mar;1(1):2-28 [PMID: 24203412]
  19. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jul;145(7):872-81 [PMID: 27348290]
  20. Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;140(1):308-38 [PMID: 23796268]
  21. Vision Res. 2008 Jun;48(13):1479-87 [PMID: 18472123]
  22. J Vis. 2019 Apr 1;19(4):13 [PMID: 30952164]
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 5;110(45):18327-32 [PMID: 24145417]
  24. Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):190-202 [PMID: 25454700]
  25. J Vis. 2019 Jun 3;19(6):16 [PMID: 31206138]
  26. Nature. 1958 Feb 15;181(4607):507-8 [PMID: 13517199]
  27. Vision Res. 2007 Oct;47(23):2982-91 [PMID: 17884129]

Grants

  1. R21 EY033182/NEI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Gravitation
Female
Adult
Motion Perception
Young Adult
Judgment
Visual Perception
Earth, Planet
Photic Stimulation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0judgmentsinformationgravityperceptionobjectsperceptualprojectilemotionsensorypredictionsroleinternalizedvisual11FallingcommonplacedailyliferequiringpreciseinterceptionavoidancearguehumanariseinterplayconstrainedNewtonianmechanicsstudyinvestigatesindividualsperceivefallingvariousgravitationalconditionsaimingunderstandmeticulouslycontrollingavailabledemonstratedphenomenaexplainedsolelysimpleheuristicsrepresentationalmomentumInsteadfoundhumansn=1314respectivelyExperiments1234influencedcombinationhighlightingphysicalconstraintsEmbeddednessEarth's

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.