Continuous glucose monitoring (Dexcom g6) in people with diabetes after kidney transplantation.

Zuzanna Jakubowska, Jolanta Ma��yszko
Author Information
  1. Zuzanna Jakubowska: Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  2. Jolanta Ma��yszko: Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Use of continuous glucose monitoring-CGM in patients on kidney replacement therapy including kidney transplant recipients, may improve glycemic control and detection of hypoglycemia. However, studies in this population in particular in kidney transplant recipients are very limited.
METHODS: The study aimed to evaluate glycemic profiles using the Dexcom G6 CGM system for 30���d a personal smartphone in people with diabetes after kidney transplantation and to assess the impact of monthly use of the CGM system on glycemic control and quality of life in this group.
RESULTS: Over 8���months, 9 people after kidney transplantation were included in the study (7 women, median age 57���years), 8 people with new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), and 1 person with diabetes mellitus type 1. The time since kidney transplantation in each of the study participants was less than 2���years. In 7 people with NODAT, the time in range was above 70%. In all study participants, hyperglycemia was observed mainly in the afternoon (2-6���pm). In some patients, pressure-induced sensor attenuations (PISAs) were noted. There was no effect of the use of Dexcom G6 on the HbA1c value. There was no impact of the use of the Dexcom G6 system on the perception of overall quality of life, but monthly use had a positive impact on the perception of the quality of health.
CONCLUSIONS: CGM systems seem to be a promising method for assessing glycemic control in people with diabetes after kidney transplantation. More extensive research is needed to assess safety and usefulness in everyday practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Sep;5(9):1669-75 [PMID: 20558559]
  2. Transplantation. 2013 Feb 15;95(3):456-62 [PMID: 23380864]
  3. Clin Transplant. 2023 Dec;37(12):e15139 [PMID: 37725341]
  4. J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(8):1211-6 [PMID: 26264400]
  5. Transplantation. 2018 Sep;102(9):1563-1568 [PMID: 29494418]
  6. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603 [PMID: 31177185]
  7. J Nephrol. 2024 Mar;37(2):267-279 [PMID: 37989976]
  8. Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2864-83 [PMID: 25249672]
  9. J Diabetes Res. 2019 Nov 27;2019:1757182 [PMID: 31886275]
  10. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Nov;8(6):1091-6 [PMID: 25316716]
  11. Diabet Med. 2021 May;38(5):e14528 [PMID: 33496979]

MeSH Term

Humans
Kidney Transplantation
Female
Middle Aged
Male
Quality of Life
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Blood Glucose
Aged
Adult
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Glycated Hemoglobin
Hypoglycemia
Smartphone
Hyperglycemia
Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Glycated Hemoglobin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0kidneytransplantationpeoplediabetesglycemicstudyDexcomusequalityglucosecontrolG6CGMsystemimpactlifetimecontinuouspatientstransplantrecipientsassessmonthly7NODAT1participantsrangepressure-inducedsensorattenuationsperceptionOBJECTIVES:Usemonitoring-CGMreplacementtherapyincludingmayimprovedetectionhypoglycemiaHoweverstudiespopulationparticularlimitedMETHODS:aimedevaluateprofilesusing30���dpersonalsmartphonegroupRESULTS:8���months9includedwomenmedianage57���years8new-onsetpersonmellitustypesinceless2���years70%hyperglycemiaobservedmainlyafternoon2-6���pmPISAsnotedeffectHbA1cvalueoverallpositivehealthCONCLUSIONS:systemsseempromisingmethodassessingextensiveresearchneededsafetyusefulnesseverydaypracticeContinuousmonitoringg6Kidneymeasurement

Similar Articles

Cited By