Tracking Small Animals in Complex Landscapes: A Comparison of Localisation Workflows for Automated Radio Telemetry Systems.

Cristina Rueda-Uribe, Alyssa J Sargent, María Ángela Echeverry-Galvis, Pedro A Camargo-Martínez, Isabella Capellini, Lesley T Lancaster, Alejandro Rico-Guevara, Justin M J Travis
Author Information
  1. Cristina Rueda-Uribe: School of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK. ORCID
  2. Alyssa J Sargent: Department of Biology University of Washington Seattle Washington USA. ORCID
  3. María Ángela Echeverry-Galvis: Departamento de Ecología y Territorio Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá Colombia. ORCID
  4. Pedro A Camargo-Martínez: Parque Nacional Natural Chingaza La Calera Colombia. ORCID
  5. Isabella Capellini: School of Biological Sciences Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK. ORCID
  6. Lesley T Lancaster: School of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK. ORCID
  7. Alejandro Rico-Guevara: Department of Biology University of Washington Seattle Washington USA. ORCID
  8. Justin M J Travis: School of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK. ORCID

Abstract

Automated radio telemetry systems (ARTS) have the potential to revolutionise our understanding of animal movement by providing a near-continuous record of individual locations in the wild. However, localisation errors in ARTS data can be very high, especially in natural landscapes with complex vegetation structure and topography. This curtails the research questions that may be addressed with this technology. We set up an ARTS grid in a valley with heterogeneous vegetation cover in the Colombian high Andes and applied an analytical pipeline to test the effectiveness of localisation methods. We performed calibration trials to simulate animal movement in high- or low-flight, or walking on the ground, and compared workflows with varying decisions related to signal cleaning, selection, smoothing, and interpretation, along with four multilateration approaches. We also quantified the influence of spatial features on the system's accuracy. Results showed large variation in localisation error, ranging between 0.4-43.4 m and 474-1929 m, depending on the localisation method used. We found that the selection of higher radio signal strengths and data smoothing based on the temporal autocorrelation are useful tools to improve accuracy. Moreover, terrain ruggedness, height of movement, vegetation type, and the location of animals inside or outside the grid area influence localisation error. In the case of our study system, thousands of location points were successfully estimated for two high-altitude hummingbird species that previously lacked movement data. Our case study on hummingbirds suggests ARTS grids can be used to estimate small animals' home ranges, associations with vegetation types, and seasonality in occurrence. We present a comparative localisation pipeline, highlighting the variety of possible decisions while processing radio signal data. Overall, this study provides guidance to improve the resolution of location estimates, broadening the application of this tracking technology in the study of the spatial ecology of wild populations.

Keywords

Associated Data

Dryad | 10.5061/dryad.3ffbg79t3

References

  1. PLoS Biol. 2008 Jul 29;6(7):e188 [PMID: 18666834]
  2. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 Aug;89(3):511-30 [PMID: 24106908]
  3. Physiol Biochem Zool. 1999 Mar-Apr;72(2):145-55 [PMID: 10068617]
  4. J Anim Ecol. 2021 May;90(5):1027-1043 [PMID: 33583036]
  5. Science. 2015 Jun 12;348(6240):aaa2478 [PMID: 26068858]
  6. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 7;276(1670):3047-52 [PMID: 19515669]
  7. Ecology. 2015 Jul;96(7):1741-53 [PMID: 26378296]
  8. Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):e8561 [PMID: 35169450]
  9. Behav Processes. 2018 Apr;149:27-34 [PMID: 29369784]
  10. Curr Biol. 2021 Oct 11;31(19):4381-4387.e6 [PMID: 34450085]
  11. Biol Lett. 2009 Apr 23;5(2):207-10 [PMID: 19158031]
  12. J Exp Biol. 2005 Nov;208(Pt 21):4063-8 [PMID: 16244165]
  13. Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Aug 31;289(1981):20221102 [PMID: 35975440]
  14. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 15;22(16): [PMID: 36015846]
  15. Mov Ecol. 2021 Jul 7;9(1):36 [PMID: 34233764]
  16. Integr Comp Biol. 2010 Sep;50(3):323-35 [PMID: 21558207]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0localisationmovementARTSdatavegetationstudyradiosignallocationAutomatedanimalwildcanhightechnologygridAndespipelinedecisionsselectionsmoothingmultilaterationinfluencespatialaccuracyerrorusedimprovecasehummingbirdsecologytelemetrysystemspotentialrevolutioniseunderstandingprovidingnear-continuousrecordindividuallocationsHowevererrorsespeciallynaturallandscapescomplexstructuretopographycurtailsresearchquestionsmayaddressedsetvalleyheterogeneouscoverColombianappliedanalyticaltesteffectivenessmethodsperformedcalibrationtrialssimulatehigh-low-flightwalkinggroundcomparedworkflowsvaryingrelatedcleaninginterpretationalongfourapproachesalsoquantifiedfeaturessystem'sResultsshowedlargevariationranging04-434 m474-1929 mdependingmethodfoundhigherstrengthsbasedtemporalautocorrelationusefultoolsMoreoverterrainruggednessheighttypeanimalsinsideoutsideareasystemthousandspointssuccessfullyestimatedtwohigh-altitudehummingbirdspeciespreviouslylackedsuggestsgridsestimatesmallanimals'homerangesassociationstypesseasonalityoccurrencepresentcomparativehighlightingvarietypossibleprocessingOverallprovidesguidanceresolutionestimatesbroadeningapplicationtrackingpopulationsTrackingSmallAnimalsComplexLandscapes:A ComparisonLocalisationWorkflowsRadioTelemetrySystemsColombiaTrochilidaeparamostate‐spacemodels

Similar Articles

Cited By