Cognitive flexibility predicts attitudes towards vaccination: evidence from a New Zealand sample.

Stephanie Gomes-Ng, Jay K Wood, Sarah Cowie
Author Information
  1. Stephanie Gomes-Ng: Department of Psychology, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. stef.gomes-ng@aut.ac.nz.
  2. Jay K Wood: Department of Psychology, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
  3. Sarah Cowie: School of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy (the reluctance or refusal to vaccinate) poses a significant threat to public health worldwide, with declining vaccination coverage resulting in the resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases (e.g., measles) in recent years. Despite efforts to combat vaccine hesitancy through information-based campaigns and other interventions, vaccine-hesitant attitudes persist. Given that such interventions likely expose individuals to information that conflicts with their own viewpoints about vaccination, cognitive flexibility - the ability to adapt one's thoughts, attitudes, beliefs, or behavior in response to changing information or environmental demands - may play a role in vaccine hesitancy.
METHODS: The current study investigated the relationship between cognitive flexibility and attitudes towards vaccination in a sample of New Zealand residents (N = 601). Cognitive flexibility was measured using perseverative responses in the Wisconsin Card-Sorting Task, and vaccination attitudes were measured using an adapted version of the Multidimensional Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (MVHS). Linear regression was used with MVHS scores as the dependent variable and cognitive flexibility and sociodemographic variables (age, gender, ethnicity, education level, religion) as predictors.
RESULTS: Cognitive flexibility predicted personal barriers to vaccination (e.g.," vaccines go against my personal beliefs"), with participants with lower levels of cognitive flexibility reporting greater personal barriers. In contrast, there was no significant relationship between cognitive flexibility and external barriers to vaccination (e.g., "vaccines cost too much"). Additionally, religious participants reported overall higher levels of vaccine hesitancy than non-religious participants.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings join others demonstrating that individual differences in cognitive style are associated with attitudes towards vaccination, and tentatively suggest that interventions aiming to reduce vaccine hesitancy may be more effective if combined with techniques to increase cognitive flexibility. To be sure, future work is needed to test the causal relationship between cognitive flexibility and attitudes towards vaccination.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Apr 1;52(7):911-6 [PMID: 21427399]
  2. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Feb 19;18:1331960 [PMID: 38439938]
  3. Psychol Health Med. 2021 Oct;26(9):1053-1062 [PMID: 32543215]
  4. J Relig Health. 2022 Jun;61(3):2198-2211 [PMID: 35556198]
  5. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Dec;18(3):149-207 [PMID: 29611455]
  6. J Relig Health. 2022 Feb;61(1):657-686 [PMID: 34843011]
  7. Health Promot Int. 2022 Feb 17;37(1): [PMID: 34244738]
  8. Ann Behav Med. 2022 Apr 2;56(4):357-367 [PMID: 34864833]
  9. Prev Med. 2019 Apr;121:99-104 [PMID: 30763627]
  10. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2019 Jul 09;7(1):253-268 [PMID: 34040850]
  11. Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):e835-42 [PMID: 24590751]
  12. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Oct;15:100278 [PMID: 34549202]
  13. Vaccine. 2017 Oct 27;35(45):6089-6095 [PMID: 28965999]
  14. Vaccine. 2020 May 6;38(21):3790-3799 [PMID: 32169393]
  15. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0267734 [PMID: 35648748]
  16. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Nov;240:112552 [PMID: 31561111]
  17. Learn Behav. 2022 Dec;50(4):494-508 [PMID: 35112316]
  18. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0159087 [PMID: 27391098]
  19. J Behav Med. 2024 Apr;47(2):184-196 [PMID: 37848749]
  20. J Prim Health Care. 2014 Dec 01;6(4):304-11 [PMID: 25485326]
  21. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68 [PMID: 23020641]
  22. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255-78 [PMID: 18154502]
  23. Vaccine. 2021 Feb 12;39(7):1080-1086 [PMID: 33461833]
  24. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Feb-Mar;46(4-5):461-5 [PMID: 9460826]
  25. Vaccine. 1992;10(13):928-35 [PMID: 1471414]
  26. Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114911 [PMID: 35395612]
  27. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4180-90 [PMID: 25896377]
  28. Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):460-467 [PMID: 35273402]
  29. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277-81 [PMID: 17406468]
  30. Vaccine. 2022 Oct 19;40(44):6383-6390 [PMID: 36182618]
  31. Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):2083-2091 [PMID: 33754321]
  32. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4 [PMID: 25896383]
  33. Behav Res Methods. 2010 Nov;42(4):1096-104 [PMID: 21139177]
  34. Health Educ Behav. 2013 Oct;40(5):544-51 [PMID: 23104978]
  35. Think Reason. 2023;29(4):760-784 [PMID: 37982007]
  36. Psychol Health Med. 2022 Dec;27(10):2113-2125 [PMID: 34875961]
  37. Health Promot Pract. 2006 Oct;7(4):467-76 [PMID: 16885509]
  38. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 01;10(9):e0132562 [PMID: 26325522]
  39. Vaccine. 2023 Jan 27;41(5):1018-1034 [PMID: 36628653]
  40. Vaccine. 2023 Jun 19;41(27):4019-4026 [PMID: 36253218]
  41. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Oct;7(10):454-9 [PMID: 14550493]
  42. J Health Psychol. 2022 Sep;27(10):2402-2419 [PMID: 34474616]
  43. BMC Public Health. 2022 May 25;22(1):1047 [PMID: 35614396]
  44. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Oct 4;3(10):e0001186 [PMID: 37792691]
  45. Vaccine. 2023 Jan 4;41(1):226-235 [PMID: 36446652]
  46. SSM Popul Health. 2021 Sep;15:100896 [PMID: 34414255]
  47. Am J Infect Control. 2022 Mar;50(3):262-267 [PMID: 34995722]
  48. Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 30;7:1483 [PMID: 27746753]
  49. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Apr;39(2):104-6 [PMID: 25715740]
  50. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 06;23:100387 [PMID: 32529178]
  51. Front Psychol. 2019 May 07;10:989 [PMID: 31133930]
  52. Sci Rep. 2024 May 6;14(1):10416 [PMID: 38710827]
  53. Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):553-567 [PMID: 33820678]
  54. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Sep;14:100241 [PMID: 34377999]
  55. Vaccine. 2021 Oct 29;39(45):6614-6621 [PMID: 34629205]
  56. Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):176-86 [PMID: 19181542]
  57. J Community Health. 2015 Jun;40(3):597-604 [PMID: 25315714]
  58. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114403 [PMID: 34547544]
  59. J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Jun 14;45(2):523-528 [PMID: 36403117]
  60. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Nov 1;16(11):2586-2593 [PMID: 32693678]
  61. J Health Commun. 2021 Feb 1;26(2):104-111 [PMID: 33719898]
  62. Health Policy. 2023 Nov;137:104895 [PMID: 37666080]
  63. Vaccine. 2012 May 28;30(25):3778-89 [PMID: 22172504]
  64. J Health Econ. 2023 Sep;91:102802 [PMID: 37672962]
  65. Public Underst Sci. 2024 Apr;33(3):343-352 [PMID: 37596812]
  66. J Gen Psychol. 1948 Jul;39:15-22 [PMID: 18889466]
  67. Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):29 [PMID: 33397962]
  68. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2021 Apr;51(4):449-460 [PMID: 33821032]
  69. Vaccine. 2015 Nov 27;33 Suppl 4:D66-71 [PMID: 26615171]
  70. Acad Pediatr. 2021 May-Jun;21(4S):S9-S16 [PMID: 33958099]
  71. Vaccine. 2013 Sep 13;31(40):4293-304 [PMID: 23859839]
  72. Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jun 11;35:102280 [PMID: 37576839]
  73. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022;30(11):2619-2626 [PMID: 35194545]
  74. Brain Behav Immun. 2021 Aug;96:100-105 [PMID: 34022372]
  75. JAMA. 2020 Oct 6;324(13):1344-1345 [PMID: 32797149]
  76. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Aug;9(8):1763-73 [PMID: 23584253]
  77. Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1285-1293 [PMID: 33122812]
  78. Fam Community Health. 2007 Jan-Mar;30(1 Suppl):S34-42 [PMID: 17159630]
  79. Vaccine. 2013 Apr 12;31(16):2011-23 [PMID: 23499565]
  80. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2043102 [PMID: 35417302]
  81. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):407-418 [PMID: 31380695]
  82. Learn Behav. 2011 May;39(2):125-37 [PMID: 21264566]
  83. N Z Med J. 2019 Oct 25;132(1504):8-12 [PMID: 31647790]

MeSH Term

Humans
New Zealand
Male
Female
Adult
Middle Aged
Vaccination Hesitancy
Young Adult
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Vaccination
Cognition
Adolescent
Aged

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0flexibilityvaccinationattitudescognitivehesitancyvaccinetowardsCognitiveVaccineeginterventionsrelationshipNewZealandpersonalbarriersparticipantssignificantinformation-maysamplemeasuredusingMVHSlevelsBACKGROUND:reluctancerefusalvaccinateposesthreatpublichealthworldwidedecliningcoverageresultingresurgencevaccine-preventablediseasesmeaslesrecentyearsDespiteeffortscombatinformation-basedcampaignsvaccine-hesitantpersistGivenlikelyexposeindividualsconflictsviewpointsabilityadaptone'sthoughtsbeliefsbehaviorresponsechangingenvironmentaldemandsplayroleMETHODS:currentstudyinvestigatedresidentsN = 601perseverativeresponsesWisconsinCard-SortingTaskadaptedversionMultidimensionalHesitancyScaleLinearregressionusedscoresdependentvariablesociodemographicvariablesagegenderethnicityeducationlevelreligionpredictorsRESULTS:predicted"vaccinesgobeliefs"lowerreportinggreatercontrastexternal"vaccinescostmuch"Additionallyreligiousreportedoverallhighernon-religiousCONCLUSIONS:findingsjoinothersdemonstratingindividualdifferencesstyleassociatedtentativelysuggestaimingreduceeffectivecombinedtechniquesincreasesurefutureworkneededtestcausalpredictsvaccination:evidenceVaccination

Similar Articles

Cited By