The Role of High Reliability Organization Foundational Practices in Building a Culture of Safety.

John S Murray, Amjed Baghdadi, Walt Dannenberg, Paul Crews, Nancy DeZellar Walsh
Author Information
  1. John S Murray: Cognosante, Falls Church, Virginia.
  2. Amjed Baghdadi: Veterans Health Administration Central Office, Washington, DC.
  3. Walt Dannenberg: Veterans Affairs Long Beach Healthcare System, California.
  4. Paul Crews: Veterans Affairs Mid-Atlantic Health Care Network, Durham, North Carolina.
  5. Nancy DeZellar Walsh: rockITdata, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

Background: High reliability organizations are designed to operate under complex conditions for extended periods by strengthening systems that help serious adverse events for patients. The US Department of Veterans Affairs formally began its enterprise-wide journey to high reliability in 2019. Four foundational practices were identified to advance a culture of safety across all Veterans Health Administration facilities. This article describes these practices, summarizes supporting evidence from the literature, and illustrates strong practices for improving safety.
Observations: A literature review was conducted from 2018 to March 2023 to identify recent evidence outlining the value of implementing the 4 foundational high reliability organization practices to improve patient safety. This evidence was used to create and implement formal processes for the foundational practices. For each foundational practice, a representative example of a strong practice within the Veterans Health Administration is provided.
Conclusions: Effective and sustained application of the foundational organization practices described can support a health care organization's journey to high reliability. Collectively, the 4 foundational practices can be adopted and implemented by other organizations in the continued pursuit of high reliability in health care.

References

  1. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Dec;29(12):1050-1052 [PMID: 32900854]
  2. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 Dec;48(12):642-652 [PMID: 36153293]
  3. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1-2 [PMID: 31694874]
  4. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Dec 1;34(6):752-760 [PMID: 34653071]
  5. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jun;75(6):1151-1161 [PMID: 30375025]
  6. Mil Med. 2023 May 16;188(5-6):901-906 [PMID: 35312000]
  7. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2772-2783 [PMID: 33559062]
  8. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1-2 [PMID: 32265256]
  9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):239 [PMID: 31014349]
  10. Mil Med. 2022 Jul 1;187(7-8):808-810 [PMID: 35247055]
  11. Fed Pract. 2024 Jan;41(1):16-21 [PMID: 38835357]
  12. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Apr;75(4):760-771 [PMID: 30230003]
  13. Mil Med. 2022 May 18;: [PMID: 35587381]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0practicesfoundationalreliabilityhighVeteranssafetyevidenceHighorganizationsjourneyHealthAdministrationliteraturestrong4organizationpracticecanhealthcareBackground:designedoperatecomplexconditionsextendedperiodsstrengtheningsystemshelpseriousadverseeventspatientsUSDepartmentAffairsformallybeganenterprise-wide2019FouridentifiedadvancecultureacrossfacilitiesarticledescribessummarizessupportingillustratesimprovingObservations:reviewconducted2018March2023identifyrecentoutliningvalueimplementingimprovepatientusedcreateimplementformalprocessesrepresentativeexamplewithinprovidedConclusions:Effectivesustainedapplicationdescribedsupportorganization'sCollectivelyadoptedimplementedcontinuedpursuitRoleReliabilityOrganizationFoundationalPracticesBuildingCultureSafety

Similar Articles

Cited By