Vertical Integration and Care Experiences Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.

Geronimo Bejarano, Andrew Ryan, Amal Trivedi, David J Meyers
Author Information
  1. Geronimo Bejarano: Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
  2. Andrew Ryan: Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
  3. Amal Trivedi: Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
  4. David J Meyers: Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

Abstract

Importance: Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries are increasingly enrolling in integrated MA plans. Legacy-integrated plans share unique features that may differ from newer integrated MA plans. It is unclear whether integrated and legacy-integrated MA plans are associated with a better beneficiary care experience compared with non-legacy-integrated and nonintegrated MA plans.
Objective: To assess whether enrollment in integrated, legacy-integrated, non-legacy-integrated, and nonintegrated MA plans is associated with better beneficiary care experiences.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included MA beneficiaries who responded to Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys conducted annually between 2015 and 2019. Data analysis was performed between October 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024.
Exposure: Medicare Advantage plan integration status, categorized as integrated, legacy-integrated, non-legacy-integrated, and nonintegrated.
Main Outcomes and Measures: The CAHPS surveys assessed 9 care experience measures. To assess differences in care experience measures, mixed linear regression analyses were performed, adjusting for demographic characteristics, plan random effects, and state fixed effects.
Results: The sample consisted of 857���695 respondents. Their mean (SD) age was 72.6 (10.3) years, and 58.1% were women. A total of 12.7% of respondents were Black, 10.7% were Hispanic, and 71.0% were White. Compared with respondents in nonintegrated MA plans, respondents in integrated MA plans were younger (mean [SD] age, 72.7 [10.3] vs 72.2 [10.3] years, respectively) and were less likely to be Black (13.1% vs 11.2%, respectively), female (58.4% vs 57.2%, respectively), and partially dual eligible (8.7% vs 6.2%, respectively). Integrated MA plans were associated with meaningfully better mean ratings only of customer service (1.6 points [95% CI, 1.1-2.1]) and health plan (1.0 points [95% CI, 0.6-1.5]) compared with nonintegrated MA plans. Legacy-integrated MA plans were associated with meaningfully better mean ratings of drug plan (3.7 points [95% CI, 2.4-5.0]), health plan (3.1 points [95% CI, 1.7-4.5]), customer service (2.8 points [95% CI, 1.3-4.4]), getting appointments and care quickly (2.6 points [95% CI, 1.2-4.0]), health care quality (1.9 points [95% CI, 1.0-2.7]), physicians who communicate well (1.1 points [95% CI, 0.4-1.8]), and care coordination (1.1 points [95% CI, 0.4-1.9]) compared with nonintegrated MA plans.
Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, integrated MA plans were not associated with better beneficiary care experiences compared with nonintegrated MA plans. Legacy-integrated MA plans were associated with higher ratings on all care experience measures compared with both non-legacy-integrated and nonintegrated MA plans. Monitoring of integrated MA plans is needed to assess whether they are adding meaningful value to MA beneficiaries and to determine their effects on the health care system.

References

  1. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2423733 [PMID: 39028672]
  2. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jun;30(6):1185-91 [PMID: 21596758]
  3. Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun;58(3):560-568 [PMID: 36376095]
  4. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jan-Feb;21(1):39-48 [PMID: 11900094]
  5. Healthc (Amst). 2015 Jun;3(2):60-2 [PMID: 26179724]
  6. J Patient Exp. 2021 Apr 8;8:23743735211008307 [PMID: 34179435]
  7. Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1:3027-3051 [PMID: 29435975]
  8. Int J Integr Care. 2020 Jan 20;20(1):2 [PMID: 31997980]
  9. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Aug 5;3(8):e222826 [PMID: 36218989]
  10. Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14264 [PMID: 38043544]
  11. Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Aug;75(4):399-433 [PMID: 29148355]
  12. J Polit Econ. 2020 Mar;12(3):984-1026 [PMID: 32719571]
  13. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Sep 2;3(9):e223301 [PMID: 36218947]
  14. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228535 [PMID: 35997982]
  15. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2337-2339 [PMID: 36973918]
  16. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Sep;31(9):2068-73 [PMID: 22949457]
  17. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):539-547 [PMID: 28264957]
  18. Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 1):1996-2013 [PMID: 23800017]
  19. JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Sep 1;4(9):e232957 [PMID: 37682555]
  20. Milbank Q. 2003;81(4):567-601 [PMID: 14678480]
  21. JAMA. 2022 Dec 6;328(21):2112-2113 [PMID: 36472612]
  22. Popul Health Manag. 2024 Jun;27(3):160-167 [PMID: 38442303]

MeSH Term

Humans
Medicare Part C
United States
Female
Male
Cross-Sectional Studies
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Patient Satisfaction
Middle Aged

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MAplans1carepoints[95%CIintegratednonintegratedassociatedbettercomparedplanexperiencenon-legacy-integratedrespondentsmean6vs2respectivelyhealth0MedicareAdvantagebeneficiariesLegacy-integratedwhetherlegacy-integratedbeneficiaryassessmeasureseffects7237%2%ratingsexperiencesstudyCAHPSsurveysperformed9age10years581%Black7[103]8meaningfullycustomerservice5]0]4-1Importance:increasinglyenrollingshareuniquefeaturesmaydiffernewerunclearObjective:enrollmentDesignSettingParticipants:cross-sectionalincludedrespondedConsumerAssessmentHealthcareProvidersSystemsconductedannually20152019DataanalysisOctober2023July312024Exposure:integrationstatuscategorizedMainOutcomesMeasures:assesseddifferencesmixedlinearregressionanalysesadjustingdemographiccharacteristicsrandomstatefixedResults:sampleconsisted857���695SDwomentotal12Hispanic710%WhiteComparedyounger[SD]lesslikely1311female4%57partiallydualeligibleIntegrated1-21]6-1drug4-57-43-44]gettingappointmentsquickly2-4quality0-27]physicianscommunicatewell8]coordination9]ConclusionsRelevance:higherMonitoringneededaddingmeaningfulvaluedeterminesystemVerticalIntegrationCareExperiencesAmongBeneficiaries

Similar Articles

Cited By