Associations between oral health impacts attributed to malocclusion and normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment need in Turkish adolescent patients.

Asuman Deniz Gümrü Çelikel, Muhsin Çifter, Beyza Tağrikulu, Kadriye Peker
Author Information
  1. Asuman Deniz Gümrü Çelikel: Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. denizgmr@istanbul.edu.tr. ORCID
  2. Muhsin Çifter: Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. ORCID
  3. Beyza Tağrikulu: Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. ORCID
  4. Kadriye Peker: Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Basic Medical Science, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the socio-dental approach, the integration of normative oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and behavioral propensity measures should be considered when assessing treatment needs and planning oral services. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between oral health impacts attributed to malocclusion and normative and self-perceived orthodontic treatment needs in adolescent patients and to determine the clinical, sociodemographic, and behavioral factors affecting their OHRQoL.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sample size of 105 adolescent patients aged 11-14 years who were referred to the Orthodontics Clinic in the Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul. Data were collected using clinical examinations and a self-reported questionnaire, including the condition-specific Child Oral Impact on Daily Performances (CS-COIDP) attributed to malocclusion and sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral factors. The index of complexity, outcome, and need (ICON), gingival index, and Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth index was used to assess oral health status. Descriptive statistics and bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were used for the data analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (66.7%) reported at least one impact. Furthermore, 47% of the adolescents had very difficult and difficult complexity grades. The most affected performances were "emotional (52.4%) and smiling (40%)". No significant differences were found in the total CS-COIDP scores according to caries experience; however, the gingival status was associated with the total OHRQoL. Lower tooth brushing frequency, increased malocclusion complexity, and subjective treatment need were the most important predictors of worse OHRQoL, accounting for 39.3% of the variance in the scores. ( R = 0.422; p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Oral health professionals should consider oral behaviors, malocclusion complexity, and subjective treatment need when planning orthodontic treatment plans. Integrating ICON, CS-COIDP, and behavioral assessment will help identify adolescents who should be prioritized for treatment.

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 10;10(1):13471 [PMID: 32778676]
  2. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):173 [PMID: 32560650]
  3. Turk J Orthod. 2019 Sep;32(3):125-131 [PMID: 31565686]
  4. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Sep;13(3):562-7 [PMID: 25284512]
  5. Eur Oral Res. 2018 Jan;52(1):43-49 [PMID: 30574598]
  6. Stomatologija. 2019;21(1):28-32 [PMID: 31619661]
  7. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Oct;30(5):515-20 [PMID: 18753305]
  8. PeerJ. 2021 Sep 01;9:e12062 [PMID: 34557348]
  9. Med J Armed Forces India. 2019 Jul;75(3):318-324 [PMID: 31388237]
  10. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Dec 23;8:152 [PMID: 21182769]
  11. Eur J Orthod. 2021 Apr 3;43(2):173-183 [PMID: 33009547]
  12. J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Jan;36(1):26-31 [PMID: 18976263]
  13. J Dent Educ. 2008 Aug;72(8):886-94 [PMID: 18676797]
  14. Int Orthod. 2016 Sep;14(3):386-98 [PMID: 27546194]
  15. Dent Med Probl. 2023 Apr-Jun;60(2):287-294 [PMID: 37458398]
  16. Community Dent Health. 2004 Jun;21(2):161-9 [PMID: 15228206]
  17. JAMA. 1995 Jan 4;273(1):59-65 [PMID: 7996652]
  18. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 3;19(1):71 [PMID: 33658030]
  19. Stat Med. 1995 Sep 15;14(17):1933-40 [PMID: 8532986]
  20. Dent Med Probl. 2022 Oct-Dec;59(4):503-508 [PMID: 36303437]
  21. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):1881-1894 [PMID: 26635095]
  22. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2013;11(3):211-20 [PMID: 23878837]
  23. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Mar 08;15:14 [PMID: 25887179]
  24. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Oct 12;2:57 [PMID: 15476561]
  25. J Dent Res. 2011 Nov;90(11):1264-70 [PMID: 21422477]
  26. Eur J Orthod. 2006 Aug;28(4):393-9 [PMID: 16723372]
  27. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 09;18(24): [PMID: 34948611]
  28. Med Pharm Rep. 2023 Jan;96(1):28-34 [PMID: 36818313]
  29. Community Dent Health. 2021 Aug 31;38(3):172-177 [PMID: 33780175]
  30. Angle Orthod. 2008 Mar;78(2):241-7 [PMID: 18251604]
  31. J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Jul;83(4):244-254 [PMID: 33938957]
  32. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):152-9 [PMID: 20691356]
  33. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Sep;31(9):1238-1248 [PMID: 28786333]
  34. Turk J Orthod. 2018 Dec;31(4):122-126 [PMID: 30701222]
  35. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Apr;36(2):179-85 [PMID: 23761429]
  36. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 May 01;19(3):e225-31 [PMID: 24121918]
  37. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 May 04;9:211-7 [PMID: 27217764]
  38. Eur J Orthod. 2004 Jun;26(3):265-71 [PMID: 15222710]
  39. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jan 18;16(1):19 [PMID: 29347943]
  40. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Nov 13;8:1571-9 [PMID: 25419119]
  41. Gen Psychiatr. 2022 Sep 13;35(4):e100764 [PMID: 36189182]
  42. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Apr;125(4):426-33; discussion 433-4 [PMID: 15067257]
  43. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;35(5):337-47 [PMID: 17822482]
  44. J Dent Educ. 2008 Aug;72(8):876-85 [PMID: 18676796]
  45. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2020 Jan;32(1):49-56 [PMID: 31955590]
  46. BMC Oral Health. 2007 May 16;7:6 [PMID: 17506880]
  47. J Orthod. 2000 Jun;27(2):149-62 [PMID: 10867071]
  48. J Public Health Dent. 2009 Summer;69(3):176-81 [PMID: 19486463]
  49. BMC Oral Health. 2014 May 22;14:57 [PMID: 24884584]
  50. Dent Med Probl. 2022 Oct-Dec;59(4):573-581 [PMID: 36583840]
  51. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;39(4):336-44 [PMID: 21198763]
  52. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12): [PMID: 35742703]
  53. Dent Med Probl. 2023 Apr-Jun;60(2):227-231 [PMID: 37366296]
  54. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jul 13;5:40 [PMID: 17631038]

MeSH Term

Humans
Adolescent
Malocclusion
Oral Health
Female
Quality of Life
Male
Child
Cross-Sectional Studies
Turkey
Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need
Self Concept
DMF Index
Attitude to Health
Periodontal Index
Health Services Needs and Demand

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentoralmalocclusionOHRQoLbehavioralhealthpatientscomplexityneednormativeattributedorthodonticadolescentclinicalCS-COIDPindextotalneedsplanningstudyimpactsself-perceivedsociodemographicfactorsusingOralICONgingivalusedstatusanalysesadolescentsdifficultscoressubjectiveBACKGROUND:socio-dentalapproachintegrationhealth-relatedqualitylifepropensitymeasuresconsideredassessingservicesThereforeaimedevaluaterelationshipdetermineaffectingMETHODS:cross-sectionalconductedconveniencesamplesize105aged11-14yearsreferredOrthodonticsClinicFacultyDentistryIstanbulDatacollectedexaminationsself-reportedquestionnaireincludingcondition-specificChildImpactDailyPerformancesoutcomeDecayedMissingFilledTeethassessDescriptivestatisticsbivariatemultivariateregressiondataRESULTS:70667%reportedleastoneimpactFurthermore47%gradesaffectedperformances"emotional524%smiling40%"significantdifferencesfoundaccordingcariesexperiencehoweverassociatedLowertoothbrushingfrequencyincreasedimportantpredictorsworseaccounting393%varianceR = 0422p < 0001CONCLUSIONS:professionalsconsiderbehaviorsplansIntegratingassessmentwillhelpidentifyprioritizedAssociationsTurkish

Similar Articles

Cited By