The effects of screen-based simulation on nursing students' acquisition of medication administration and dosage calculation skills: a randomized controlled trial.

Fatima Zahra Mahou, Guillaume Decormeille, Omaima Changuiti, Mohammed Mouhaoui, Asmae Khattabi
Author Information
  1. Fatima Zahra Mahou: Mohammed VI International School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health (UM6SS), Casablanca, Morocco. fmahou@um6ss.ma.
  2. Guillaume Decormeille: CLLE Laboratory, University of Toulouse Jean Jaurès, UMR 5263, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
  3. Omaima Changuiti: Higher School of Paramedical Sciences (ESSP), Health Sciences Research Center (CReSS) Rabat, International University of Rabat (UIR), Rabat, Morocco.
  4. Mohammed Mouhaoui: Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.
  5. Asmae Khattabi: Mohammed VI International School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health (UM6SS), Casablanca, Morocco.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screen-based simulation is a cost-effective educational modality that allows nursing students to comfortably acquire new skills as they become accustomed to digital environments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a screen-based simulation tool in enhancing knowledge and skills related to medication administration and dosage calculation in nursing students.
METHODS: This multicenter, single-blind, stratified, randomized controlled trial initially enrolled 480 nursing students. The 351 students eligibles were randomly allocated to two groups. Using a screen-based simulation tool (SIMDOSE), the intervention group was trained in drug administration and dosage calculation through four perfusion clinical cases. The control group underwent the same training content using the paper-and-pencil method. knowledge and skills acquisition, Students' satisfaction, self-confidence and anxiety were analyzed using Jamovi software (version 2.3.18).
RESULTS: 4 out of 5 main variables examined were significantly different, specifically in dosage calculation, where the simulation group excelled both in the knowledge post-test (post - pre = 1.00 (20%); p = 0.004) and in the objective structured clinical examination (p = 0.013). The intervention group reported higher levels of satisfaction and self-confidence than the control group (p < 0.001). Their moderate anxiety levels didn't differ significantly (0.161).
CONCLUSION: The SIMDOSE platform can be used as a supplementary teaching method of dosage calculation for nursing students. Screen-based simulation has benefits that nurse educators should be aware of, such as being a key to more satisfied and confident students.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: This Moroccan clinical trial was prospectively registered (16/05/2023) in the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (pactr.samrc.ac.za) with trial registration number PACTR202305505743210.

Keywords

References

  1. Comput Inform Nurs. 2018 Feb;36(2):98-105 [PMID: 29176359]
  2. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:128-133 [PMID: 29335162]
  3. Comput Inform Nurs. 2018 Feb;36(2):84-89 [PMID: 28952980]
  4. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S467-72 [PMID: 22588767]
  5. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 15;22(9):e18290 [PMID: 32930664]
  6. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jan;96:104605 [PMID: 33096362]
  7. Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Oct;129:105903 [PMID: 37467707]
  8. Simul Healthc. 2016 Aug;11(4):238-48 [PMID: 27465839]
  9. Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Mar;122:105712 [PMID: 36669303]
  10. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:179-84 [PMID: 27537670]
  11. Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Jun 01;41(6):467-476 [PMID: 36633879]
  12. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Dec;34(12):1435-42 [PMID: 25156144]
  13. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Aug;14(4):391-5 [PMID: 24857050]
  14. Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Jan 11;8(1):2 [PMID: 36627708]
  15. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):434-40 [PMID: 23669600]
  16. BMC Nurs. 2020 Jan 13;19:4 [PMID: 31956293]
  17. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021 Nov;60:32-41 [PMID: 34336011]
  18. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Mar;110:105264 [PMID: 35030352]
  19. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104726 [PMID: 33493925]
  20. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Aug;55:38-44 [PMID: 28521248]
  21. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e11529 [PMID: 30882355]
  22. Am J Surg. 2003 Jul;186(1):67-74 [PMID: 12842753]
  23. Nurse Educ. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5S Suppl 1):S32-S37 [PMID: 28832460]
  24. Simul Healthc. 2020 Feb;15(1):46-54 [PMID: 32028447]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0simulationstudentsdosagenursingcalculationgroupadministrationtrialScreen-basedskillsscreen-basedknowledgeclinicaltoolmedicationrandomizedcontrolledSIMDOSEinterventioncontrolusingmethodacquisitionsatisfactionself-confidenceanxietysignificantlyp = 0levelsBACKGROUND:cost-effectiveeducationalmodalityallowscomfortablyacquirenewbecomeaccustomeddigitalenvironmentsaimstudyevaluateeffectivenessenhancingrelatedMETHODS:multicentersingle-blindstratifiedinitiallyenrolled480351eligiblesrandomlyallocatedtwogroupsUsingtraineddrugfourperfusioncasesunderwenttrainingcontentpaper-and-pencilStudents'analyzedJamovisoftwareversion2318RESULTS:45mainvariablesexamineddifferentspecificallyexcelledpost-testpost-pre = 10020%004objectivestructuredexamination013reportedhigherp < 0001moderatediffer0161CONCLUSION:platformcanusedsupplementaryteachingbenefitsnurseeducatorsawarekeysatisfiedconfidentTRIALREGISTRATION:Moroccanprospectivelyregistered16/05/2023PanAfricanClinicalTrialRegistrypactrsamrcaczaregistrationnumberPACTR202305505743210effectsstudents'skills:DrugcalculationsMedicationprocedureNursingOSCEVirtual

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.