Factors influencing unrelated stem cell donation a mixed-methods integrated systematic review.

Jessica Forbes, Paul Rice, Jenny Groarke, Emma Berry, Henrietta Graham, Lisa Graham-Wisener
Author Information
  1. Jessica Forbes: Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland. ORCID
  2. Paul Rice: Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland. ORCID
  3. Jenny Groarke: Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  4. Emma Berry: Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  5. Henrietta Graham: The Centre of Lifestyle Medicine and Behaviour, School of Sport Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
  6. Lisa Graham-Wisener: Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is an imbalance between demand for and availability of stem cell donors worldwide. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide the first comprehensive understanding of facilitators and barriers influencing unrelated stem cell donation (USCD) in adults, through a data synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Identification of the facilitators and barriers associated with stem cell donation intention and behaviour is essential to inform the development of behaviour change interventions to meet the current demand.
METHODS: Four databases were searched (Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and CINAHL) and the last search was in February 2021. The search was limited to studies written in English and published from 1980 to present. Screening, quality assessment, data extraction and data synthesis incorporating the COM-B model were undertaken in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for an integrated mixed-methods review.
RESULTS: Fifty studies were included in the review, analysis and mapping produced four integrated findings. Donation-related knowledge was a facilitator and conversely, lack of knowledge was a barrier to donation related behaviours. Perceived convenience, positive social influences, religious beliefs and the accessibility of positive donation-related social norms promoted positive donation related behaviours. Altruism and sense of duty were the most commonly cited motives for donation related behaviours.Through mapping to the COM-B model, Communication/Marketing, and Service Provision are the primary policy categories that can be used to change donation related behaviours.
CONCLUSION: Future interventions should focus on targeted education regarding unrelated stem cell donation and creating recruitment campaigns that emphasise the life-saving potential of donation.

Keywords

References

  1. Folia Med Cracov. 2014;54(2):27-33 [PMID: 25648307]
  2. Health Educ Res. 2005 Jun;20(3):294-7 [PMID: 15632097]
  3. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 Mar;34(2):369-77 [PMID: 17573301]
  4. Health Psychol. 2020 Apr;39(4):316-324 [PMID: 31724423]
  5. Health Educ (Muncie). 2014 Spring;46(1):14-19 [PMID: 25632376]
  6. Transplant Proc. 2020 Sep;52(7):1994-2000 [PMID: 32718747]
  7. Saudi Med J. 2019 Oct;40(10):1045-1051 [PMID: 31588485]
  8. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999 Aug;24(3):313-9 [PMID: 10455372]
  9. Health Educ Res. 2012 Jun;27(3):513-22 [PMID: 22156070]
  10. Blood. 2016 Jan 14;127(2):260-7 [PMID: 26527675]
  11. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Mar;54(3):425-431 [PMID: 30087465]
  12. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Sep;22(9):1710-1716 [PMID: 27343721]
  13. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(1):29-40 [PMID: 10817466]
  14. Transfusion. 1989 May;29(4):317-22 [PMID: 2655206]
  15. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7(1):45-8 [PMID: 11215698]
  16. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Jun;19(6):404-11 [PMID: 27327068]
  17. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  18. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jul;19(7):1046-58 [PMID: 23603456]
  19. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  20. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Feb;48(2):210-9 [PMID: 22484322]
  21. Br J Health Psychol. 2025 Feb;30(1):e12758 [PMID: 39449116]
  22. Transfusion. 2017 Dec;57(12):2928-2936 [PMID: 28944484]
  23. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jun;52(6):811-817 [PMID: 28287639]
  24. Blood. 2013 Feb 21;121(8):1469-76 [PMID: 23258921]
  25. Med Health R I. 2011 Oct;94(10):302-5 [PMID: 22164662]
  26. Blood. 2001 Oct 1;98(7):2043-51 [PMID: 11567988]
  27. Int J Hematol. 2013 Apr;97(4):446-55 [PMID: 23420184]
  28. Transfus Med. 2017 Jun;27(3):207-212 [PMID: 27859798]
  29. Health Psychol. 1993 Jul;12(4):272-6 [PMID: 8404800]
  30. Transfusion. 2018 Jan;58(1):242-254 [PMID: 29106732]
  31. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 May;45(5):811-8 [PMID: 20154736]
  32. Transplant Proc. 2021 Mar;53(2):724-729 [PMID: 33581849]
  33. Ann Transplant. 2015 Oct 08;20:604-13 [PMID: 26447689]
  34. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004 Jul 27;1(1):11 [PMID: 15279674]
  35. Transplant Proc. 2011 May;43(4):981-4 [PMID: 21620031]
  36. Psychol Health. 2019 Sep;34(9):1073-1104 [PMID: 31213077]
  37. Transfusion. 2021 Jan;61(1):24-28 [PMID: 33084098]
  38. Transplantation. 2004 May 27;77(10):1529-34 [PMID: 15239616]
  39. Vox Sang. 2018 May;113(4):307-316 [PMID: 29359335]
  40. Vox Sang. 2018 Apr;113(3):205-219 [PMID: 29243265]
  41. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 Mar;45(3):422-8 [PMID: 19648972]
  42. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Nov;6(11):e573-e584 [PMID: 31477550]
  43. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 25;12(10):e0186438 [PMID: 29069088]
  44. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jul;45(1):137-47 [PMID: 9203278]
  45. Transfusion. 1986 Jul-Aug;26(4):315-23 [PMID: 3523871]
  46. Transplant Proc. 2004 Dec;36(10):3212-9 [PMID: 15686731]
  47. Transfusion. 1986 Jul-Aug;26(4):324-30 [PMID: 3523872]
  48. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Apr;49(4):525-31 [PMID: 24419516]
  49. Transfus Med. 2019 Oct;29(5):332-337 [PMID: 31209947]
  50. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Jul 03;7(1):36-43 [PMID: 31879682]
  51. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014 Jul;41(4):264-72 [PMID: 25254022]
  52. Transfus Med Rev. 2012 Jul;26(3):224-237.e6 [PMID: 22126711]
  53. Transplant Proc. 2008 Jun;40(5):1271-4 [PMID: 18589085]
  54. Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Mar;3(3):e175-e194 [PMID: 33518503]
  55. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 May;45(5):832-8 [PMID: 20173787]
  56. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  57. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e12932 [PMID: 30277290]
  58. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jun;206:86-92 [PMID: 29684652]
  59. Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42 [PMID: 21513547]
  60. J Health Soc Behav. 1993 Dec;34(4):285-301 [PMID: 8034947]
  61. BMC Public Health. 2021 May 29;21(1):1014 [PMID: 34051788]
  62. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 24;371(4):339-48 [PMID: 25054717]
  63. Transfus Med Hemother. 2021 May;48(3):188-195 [PMID: 34177425]
  64. Psychol Health Med. 2014;19(1):115-25 [PMID: 23473418]
  65. Transfusion. 1989 Nov-Dec;29(9):778-82 [PMID: 2588316]
  66. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):1518-1527 [PMID: 28818845]
  67. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Mar;26(3):593-599 [PMID: 31654786]
  68. Transfus Med. 2019 Apr;29 Suppl 1:28-41 [PMID: 29493019]
  69. J Family Med Prim Care. 2013 Jan;2(1):9-14 [PMID: 24479036]
  70. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Mar 23;3(1):e14 [PMID: 28336503]

MeSH Term

Humans
Unrelated Donors
Altruism
Motivation
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Stem Cells
Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0donationstemcellreviewunrelatedrelatedbehavioursdatabehaviourintegratedpositivedemandsystematicfacilitatorsbarriersinfluencingsynthesischangeinterventionssearchstudiesCOM-Bmodelmixed-methodsmappingknowledgesocialPURPOSE:imbalanceavailabilitydonorsworldwidepurposeprovidefirstcomprehensiveunderstandingUSCDadultsqualitativequantitativeevidenceIdentificationassociatedintentionessentialinformdevelopmentmeetcurrentMETHODS:FourdatabasessearchedEmbasePsycINFOMEDLINECINAHLlastFebruary2021limitedwrittenEnglishpublished1980presentScreeningqualityassessmentextractionincorporatingundertakenlineJoannaBriggsInstitutemethodologyRESULTS:FiftyincludedanalysisproducedfourfindingsDonation-relatedfacilitatorconverselylackbarrierPerceivedconvenienceinfluencesreligiousbeliefsaccessibilitydonation-relatednormspromotedAltruismsensedutycommonlycitedmotivesThroughCommunication/MarketingServiceProvisionprimarypolicycategoriescanusedCONCLUSION:Futurefocustargetededucationregardingcreatingrecruitmentcampaignsemphasiselife-savingpotentialFactorshaematopoieticstem���cell

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)