Virtual practice facilitation as an implementation strategy for launching opioid safety committees for quality improvement in primary care: feasibility, acceptability, and intervention fidelity.

Jessica Mogk, Claire L Allen, Carly E Levitz, Kelsey Stefanik-Guizlo, Emily Bourcier, Melissa Trapp Petty, Paula Lozano
Author Information
  1. Jessica Mogk: Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. Jessica.M.Mogk@kp.org.
  2. Claire L Allen: Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
  3. Carly E Levitz: Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
  4. Kelsey Stefanik-Guizlo: Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
  5. Emily Bourcier: Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
  6. Melissa Trapp Petty: Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
  7. Paula Lozano: Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practice facilitation (PF) is an evidence-based multicomponent in-person implementation strategy. COVID-19-related lockdowns caused many implementation initiatives to rapidly shift to virtual settings, but there is limited evidence on PF deployed exclusively using virtual meeting platforms. Our objective was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of virtual PF used in a primary care setting to implement interdisciplinary opioid safety committees (OSCs) to improve care for patients using opioid medicines for persistent pain and reduce high-dose opioid prescribing. We also describe alignment of virtual PF with the core functions of PF and fidelity of participating clinics to the OSC intervention.
METHODS: We applied qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate virtual PF used to implement a quality improvement project at Kaiser Permanente Washington, an integrated health system in Washington State. We established interdisciplinary OSCs in primary care clinics using virtual PF. OSCs were tasked with promoting opioid safety and high-quality pain care through population management and chart reviews. We used administrative data to calculate feasibility measures including attendance and retention. Acceptability data came from interviews with OSC members conducted by evaluators. Measures of fidelity to the OSC intervention were abstracted from meeting notes and administrative data. We used qualitative methods to assess the adherence of virtual PF to the core functions of PF.
RESULTS: Facilitators carried out a comprehensive PF approach virtually and demonstrated adherence to the core functions of PF. We established OSCs in eight clinics and conducted an average of 17.5 virtual PF meetings over eight months of PF for each clinic. Average attendance was 75% and we had 84% retention. OSC members were highly satisfied with virtual PF. Facilitators effectively supported teams through implementation and technical challenges and OSC members gained skills through virtual PF. We implemented OSCs with high fidelity, suggesting virtual PF is an effective implementation strategy.
CONCLUSIONS: We found virtual PF is a feasible and acceptable implementation strategy for this intervention and identified strategies to support care teams through challenges. Our findings can help inform future implementation efforts, especially those hoping to engage geographically dispersed clinics or remote clinical staff.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Keywords

References

  1. Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 19;11(1):101 [PMID: 27435723]
  2. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jul;38(Suppl 3):849-856 [PMID: 37340269]
  3. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(Suppl 3):918-926 [PMID: 33145686]
  4. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211014093 [PMID: 33928813]
  5. BMJ. 2017 Mar 6;356:i6795 [PMID: 28264797]
  6. Eff Clin Pract. 1998 Aug-Sep;1(1):2-4 [PMID: 10345255]
  7. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 May 13;5(3):e295 [PMID: 32656464]
  8. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76 [PMID: 20957426]
  9. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1968-1977 [PMID: 30066117]
  10. Learn Health Syst. 2021 Jan 24;5(4):e10258 [PMID: 34667878]
  11. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1001-1010 [PMID: 31792866]
  12. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):322-332 [PMID: 33145694]
  13. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Oct 31;6(1):167 [PMID: 33292770]
  14. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):332-340 [PMID: 35614169]
  15. Ann Fam Med. 2022 Sep-Oct;20(5):414-422 [PMID: 36228060]
  16. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):75-85 [PMID: 19124857]
  17. Health Equity. 2023 Feb 08;7(1):89-99 [PMID: 36876238]
  18. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):789-795 [PMID: 32989075]
  19. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Mar 27;20(1):129 [PMID: 30917806]
  20. Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 5;14(1):100 [PMID: 31805968]
  21. Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jul;17(4):319-325 [PMID: 31285209]
  22. Fam Med. 2005 Sep;37(8):581-8 [PMID: 16145629]
  23. Addict Behav. 2018 Nov;86:40-43 [PMID: 29752012]
  24. J Nurs Care Qual. 2019 Jul/Sep;34(3):210-216 [PMID: 30480614]
  25. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 05;17(5): [PMID: 32151044]
  26. Ann Fam Med. 2019 Aug 12;17(Suppl 1):S33-S39 [PMID: 31405874]
  27. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Sep-Oct;32(5):715-723 [PMID: 31506367]
  28. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):824-831 [PMID: 31637651]
  29. PLoS One. 2022 Jun 28;17(6):e0269635 [PMID: 35763485]
  30. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;11(1):80-3 [PMID: 23319510]
  31. J Rural Health. 2023 Jan;39(1):279-290 [PMID: 35703582]
  32. Psychiatr Serv. 2020 May 1;71(5):518-521 [PMID: 31996114]
  33. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57 [PMID: 17872937]
  34. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):63-74 [PMID: 22230833]
  35. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):95-103 [PMID: 34109545]
  36. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Sep-Oct;19(5):506-10 [PMID: 16951300]
  37. Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jul 31;4(1):89 [PMID: 37525267]
  38. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(4):793-801 [PMID: 34981342]
  39. Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 22;2(1):66 [PMID: 34158115]
  40. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):624-31 [PMID: 26355134]

MeSH Term

Humans
Quality Improvement
Primary Health Care
Analgesics, Opioid
Feasibility Studies
COVID-19
Washington
SARS-CoV-2

Chemicals

Analgesics, Opioid

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PFvirtualimplementationfacilitationcareopioidOSCsOSCstrategyusedsafetyfidelityclinicsinterventionPracticeusingfeasibilityprimarypaincorefunctionsimprovementdatamembersmeetingassessacceptabilityimplementinterdisciplinarycommitteesqualitativemethodsqualityWashingtonestablishedmanagementchartadministrativeattendanceretentionconductedadherenceFacilitatorseightteamschallengesVirtualpracticeBACKGROUND:evidence-basedmulticomponentin-personCOVID-19-relatedlockdownscausedmanyinitiativesrapidlyshiftsettingslimitedevidencedeployedexclusivelyplatformsobjectivesettingimprovepatientsmedicinespersistentreducehigh-doseprescribingalsodescribealignmentparticipatingMETHODS:appliedquantitativeevaluateprojectKaiserPermanenteintegratedhealthsystemStatetaskedpromotinghigh-qualitypopulationreviewscalculatemeasuresincludingAcceptabilitycameinterviewsevaluatorsMeasuresabstractednotesRESULTS:carriedcomprehensiveapproachvirtuallydemonstratedaverage175meetingsmonthsclinicAverage75%84%highlysatisfiedeffectivelysupportedtechnicalgainedskillsimplementedhighsuggestingeffectiveCONCLUSIONS:foundfeasibleacceptableidentifiedstrategiessupportfindingscanhelpinformfutureeffortsespeciallyhopingengagegeographicallydispersedremoteclinicalstaffTRIALREGISTRATION:applicablelaunchingcare:ImplementationInterdisciplinaryreviewOpioidPainPersistentcoachingQuality

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.