Community noise mapping: The need, identified challenges, and potential solutions.

Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava, Prateek Sudhakar Bobhate, Prithvi Brahmanand Petkar, Punit Fulzele
Author Information
  1. Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava: Deputy Director (Research and Development), Off Campus, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Maharashtra, India.
  2. Prateek Sudhakar Bobhate: Department of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Vijaypur, Jammu, India.
  3. Prithvi Brahmanand Petkar: Department of Community Medicine, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wanadongri, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
  4. Punit Fulzele: Department of Pedodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

Hearing loss and deafness have been globally recognized as one of the major public health concerns that need immediate attention. Noise mapping refers to the systematic process of measuring and visualizing the noise level distribution in a well-defined location, preferably in urban settings or industrial areas. This exercise of noise mapping is generally done with the intention of identifying the noise hotspots and measuring the extent of exposure to noise levels in different areas. The process of noise mapping at the community level is expected to have some challenges and these must be identified to effectively deal with them. In conclusion, we cannot undermine the fact that there is an immense need to implement effective noise management strategies to reduce the development of health-related implications. In dealing with this global concern, noise mapping is a crucial tool to provide comprehensive insights about noise levels in different areas, which in turn can be utilized to take specific actions for building a healthier and sustainable environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Aug 15;562:852-859 [PMID: 27115622]
  2. PLoS One. 2016 Sep 14;11(9):e0161835 [PMID: 27626273]
  3. Noise Health. 2019 Sep-Oct;21(102):194-199 [PMID: 32820742]
  4. Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jan 27;195(2):335 [PMID: 36705776]
  5. Environ Monit Assess. 2023 May 26;195(6):740 [PMID: 37233823]
  6. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(15):15608-15616 [PMID: 30945078]
  7. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 15;839:156216 [PMID: 35643133]
  8. Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110905 [PMID: 33631139]
  9. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Oct 12;17(10): [PMID: 29023397]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13): [PMID: 35805610]
  11. Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Jan;189(1):17 [PMID: 27975332]
  12. Curr Pollut Rep. 2021;7(3):325-343 [PMID: 34123708]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 13;13(5): [PMID: 27187438]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0noisemappingneedareasprocessmeasuringlevelurbanlevelsdifferentchallengesidentifiedCommunityHearinglossdeafnessgloballyrecognizedonemajorpublichealthconcernsimmediateattentionNoisereferssystematicvisualizingdistributionwell-definedlocationpreferablysettingsindustrialexercisegenerallydoneintentionidentifyinghotspotsextentexposurecommunityexpectedmusteffectivelydealconclusionunderminefactimmenseimplementeffectivemanagementstrategiesreducedevelopmenthealth-relatedimplicationsdealingglobalconcerncrucialtoolprovidecomprehensiveinsightsturncanutilizedtakespecificactionsbuildinghealthiersustainableenvironmentmapping:potentialsolutions

Similar Articles

Cited By