Investigating the effect of continuous and partial reinforcement in conceptual fear generalization.

Sharmili Mitra, Manish Kumar Asthana
Author Information
  1. Sharmili Mitra: Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, 247667, India.
  2. Manish Kumar Asthana: Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, 247667, India. m.asthana@hs.iitr.ac.in.

Abstract

Fear generalization plays a major role in the acquisition and maintenance of anxiety disorders. In fear generalization, conditioned fear responses are observed for novel stimuli sharing perceptually or conceptually similar properties with the conditioned stimulus (CS). The reinforcement rates of the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) impact fear acquisition and generalization. Fear generalization can be studied using the category-based conditioning paradigm, where individuals are conditioned to members of a category rather than a single stimulus. The current study explored the effect of UCS reinforcement (i.e., continuous and partial) on conceptual fear generalization due to category-based similarity using a visual aversive UCS. The CSs were exemplars from four categories, i.e., animals, insects, household appliances, and tools. Thirty healthy participants underwent fear acquisition with exemplars from the four stimulus categories, presented with varying levels of UCS reinforcement (100%, 62.5%, and 37.5%). Subsequently, fear generalization was tested with novel unreinforced exemplars from each category. A significant effect of reinforcement on the UCS expectancy and CS-UCS contingency ratings was observed. UCS expectancy ratings increased with increasing certainty of UCS occurrence in the generalization phase. Our results may help to understand how fear generalizes to conceptually related stimuli based on the certainty of the UCS occurrence.

Keywords

References

  1. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Sep;113:143-8 [PMID: 24120427]
  2. J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Dec;23(8):1047-52 [PMID: 19656653]
  3. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 1;75(11):909-15 [PMID: 24001473]
  4. Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Dec 15;44(12):1239-47 [PMID: 9861467]
  5. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Nov;30(11):3636-44 [PMID: 19384886]
  6. Nat Neurosci. 2015 Dec;18(12):1811-8 [PMID: 26571459]
  7. J Exp Psychol. 1952 Apr;43(4):313-20 [PMID: 14946341]
  8. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Oct;174:107285 [PMID: 32745600]
  9. Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Sep;52(5):3485-3486 [PMID: 31520570]
  10. Behav Res Ther. 2022 Dec;159:104201 [PMID: 36323054]
  11. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;44(2):201-6 [PMID: 23207968]
  12. Behav Res Ther. 2021 Mar;138:103802 [PMID: 33482583]
  13. Behav Brain Res. 2021 Feb 1;398:112931 [PMID: 33053386]
  14. Behav Res Ther. 2008 May;46(5):678-87 [PMID: 18394587]
  15. Exp Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):23-39 [PMID: 30777514]
  16. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Feb;148(2):289-303 [PMID: 30475021]
  17. Cereb Cortex. 2014 Nov;24(11):2859-72 [PMID: 23709642]
  18. J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Jan;23(1):130-5 [PMID: 18565725]
  19. Behav Res Ther. 2018 Aug;107:53-63 [PMID: 29870830]
  20. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Oct;129:75-94 [PMID: 34314751]
  21. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun;16(3):447-56 [PMID: 26810702]
  22. Cogn Emot. 2022 Jun;36(4):630-642 [PMID: 35503408]
  23. Behav Neurosci. 2007 Aug;121(4):635-42 [PMID: 17663589]
  24. J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Jan;69:102174 [PMID: 31877422]
  25. J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Oct;28(7):731-6 [PMID: 25173980]
  26. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Nov;72(11):2647-2657 [PMID: 31144583]
  27. Cogn Emot. 2021 Dec;35(8):1516-1526 [PMID: 34602017]
  28. Behav Brain Res. 2011 Aug 1;221(1):237-45 [PMID: 21377494]
  29. Psychol Rev. 1984 Jan;91(1):112-49 [PMID: 6571422]
  30. Behav Res Ther. 2019 Mar;114:44-50 [PMID: 30771704]
  31. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Aug;47(9):1652-1661 [PMID: 35501429]
  32. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;48:149-55 [PMID: 25863485]
  33. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4 [PMID: 24141714]
  34. Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;167(1):47-55 [PMID: 19917595]
  35. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):105-17 [PMID: 16647833]
  36. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Feb;72(2):118-131 [PMID: 29516769]
  37. Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jun;93:116-122 [PMID: 28410461]
  38. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 17;10(1):15283 [PMID: 32943701]
  39. J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 24;30(8):3013-21 [PMID: 20181598]
  40. Behav Neurosci. 2016 Feb;130(1):36-43 [PMID: 26692449]
  41. Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;25(9):1816-21 [PMID: 25015685]
  42. Biol Psychol. 2012 Feb;89(2):300-5 [PMID: 22118937]
  43. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59 [PMID: 7962581]
  44. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Aug;148(8):1426-1434 [PMID: 30667260]
  45. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  46. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2019 Apr;26:32-39 [PMID: 31131296]
  47. Learn Mem. 2009 Jun 24;16(7):460-9 [PMID: 19553384]
  48. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 05;8:624 [PMID: 25249955]
  49. Behav Ther. 2015 Sep;46(5):561-82 [PMID: 26459838]
  50. Cogn Emot. 2016;30(2):340-52 [PMID: 25648156]
  51. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 18;5:16701 [PMID: 26576733]
  52. Cortex. 2020 Aug;129:496-509 [PMID: 32580869]
  53. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):811-828 [PMID: 30523574]
  54. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul;14(7):488-501 [PMID: 23783199]
  55. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):342-354 [PMID: 33674206]
  56. Learn Behav. 2022 Sep;50(3):417-432 [PMID: 35710961]
  57. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Jun;77:247-285 [PMID: 28263758]
  58. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Jan;41(1):24-44 [PMID: 26068726]
  59. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jun;14(6):791-6 [PMID: 21552275]
  60. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Apr;20(4):929-40 [PMID: 19679543]
  61. Science. 1987 Sep 11;237(4820):1317-23 [PMID: 3629243]
  62. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jan;51(1):79-88 [PMID: 13286444]
  63. Biol Psychol. 2013 Feb;92(2):185-90 [PMID: 23131617]
  64. Prog Neurobiol. 2017 Sep;156:164-188 [PMID: 28576664]
  65. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2012 Apr 16;2:7 [PMID: 22738021]
  66. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Feb;19(2):73-7 [PMID: 25577706]
  67. Neural Plast. 2020 Nov 22;2020:8866386 [PMID: 33299402]
  68. Cogn Emot. 2020 Mar;34(2):352-358 [PMID: 30987523]
  69. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):1720-1729 [PMID: 29036532]
  70. Psychophysiology. 2024 Jan;61(1):e14423 [PMID: 37623276]

MeSH Term

Humans
Fear
Male
Female
Adult
Reinforcement, Psychology
Young Adult
Generalization, Psychological
Conditioning, Classical

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0generalizationfearUCSreinforcementstimulusFearacquisitionconditionedeffectexemplarsobservednovelstimuliconceptuallyusingcategory-basedconditioningcategoryiecontinuouspartialconceptualfourcategories5%expectancyratingscertaintyoccurrenceplaysmajorrolemaintenanceanxietydisordersresponsessharingperceptuallysimilarpropertiesCSratesunconditionedimpactcanstudiedparadigmindividualsmembersrathersinglecurrentstudyexploredduesimilarityvisualaversiveCSsanimalsinsectshousehold appliancestoolsThirtyhealthyparticipantsunderwentpresentedvaryinglevels100%6237SubsequentlytestedunreinforcedsignificantCS-UCScontingencyincreasedincreasingphaseresultsmayhelpunderstandgeneralizesrelatedbasedInvestigatingConceptualLearningReinforcementrate

Similar Articles

Cited By