Barriers and facilitators of collaboration during the implementation of vocational rehabilitation interventions: a systematic review.

Yvonne Noteboom, Alexandra W A Montanus, Femke van Nassau, George Burchell, Johannes R Anema, Maaike A Huysmans
Author Information
  1. Yvonne Noteboom: Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Van Der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands. y.noteboom@amsterdamumc.nl.
  2. Alexandra W A Montanus: Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Van Der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
  3. Femke van Nassau: Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Van Der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
  4. George Burchell: VU University Library, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 0F-039 - 1081 HV, the Netherlands.
  5. Johannes R Anema: Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Van Der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
  6. Maaike A Huysmans: Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Van Der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stakeholders from the mental health care sector and the social security sector are often involved in the implementation of vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions, so-called coordinated or integrated program, as clients need support from both fields. Collaboration of the involved stakeholders from both sectors is therefore important. In this study, a review was performed to provide an overview of the barriers and facilitators for collaboration during the implementation of coordinated or integrated vocational rehabilitation interventions.
METHODS: A systematic review (PROSPERO ID CRD42023404823) was performed in the databases of Medline PubMed (n���=���11.511), Web of Science (n���=���4821), and PSYCINFO (n���=���368). We used the AI-driven tool ASReview to support the screening process, conducted by two researchers independently. A thematic content analysis was performed to analyse the reported barriers and facilitators. Appraisal of the quality of included studies was conducted using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP).
RESULTS: We included 105 of the 11,873 identified articles for full text screening, of which 26 were included for final analysis. Six themes of barriers and facilitators were found: attitude and beliefs, engagement and trust, governance and structure, practical issues, professionals involved, and client-centeredness. We found a reporting quality between 8 and 20, based on CASP.
CONCLUSION: We found that a positive attitude towards and belief of those involved in collaboration during coordinated of integrated VR interventions can enhance collaboration. Moreover, a negative attitude or lack of trust, most often found among mental health professionals, hindered collaboration. Collaboration between stakeholders from different sectors could be increased by improving positive attitudes and mutual trust and increasing knowledge about each other's expertise. Also sharing success stories, co-location of professionals, and having a clear governance were found to be a factor in collaborations' success.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jul;58(7):914-21 [PMID: 17602006]
  2. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008 Spring;31(4):360-6 [PMID: 18407886]
  3. Work. 2008;31(2):181-93 [PMID: 18957736]
  4. BMC Psychol. 2020 Apr 21;8(1):36 [PMID: 32317023]
  5. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Mar;36(1):4-6 [PMID: 23477643]
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(7):1028-35; discussion 1036-8 [PMID: 21414706]
  7. World Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;11(1):32-9 [PMID: 22295007]
  8. Can J Psychiatry. 2008 May;53(5):294-305 [PMID: 18551850]
  9. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Nov 1;43(6):540-549 [PMID: 28967666]
  10. J Interprof Care. 2003 Aug;17(3):282-91 [PMID: 12850879]
  11. Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Aug;59(8):886-92 [PMID: 18678686]
  12. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):181 [PMID: 33827498]
  13. Community Ment Health J. 2019 Feb;55(2):350-359 [PMID: 29344834]
  14. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 May;48(3):528-538 [PMID: 32978711]
  15. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Mar;43(1):65-71 [PMID: 31928024]
  16. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Jun;69(3):489-501 [PMID: 11495178]
  17. BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;13(7):e072254 [PMID: 37419641]
  18. BJOG. 2012 Jul;119(8):903-5 [PMID: 22703418]
  19. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008 Spring;31(4):296-9 [PMID: 18407878]
  20. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2007;49(9):611-21 [PMID: 17853370]
  21. BMC Public Health. 2017 May 11;17(1):431 [PMID: 28490328]
  22. Autism Adulthood. 2019 Sep 1;1(3):194-201 [PMID: 36601422]
  23. Int J Integr Care. 2008 Jun 19;8:e52 [PMID: 18690291]
  24. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Apr;87:70-78 [PMID: 29471929]
  25. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Mar;43(1):18-23 [PMID: 31144833]
  26. Int J Integr Care. 2001;1:e31 [PMID: 16896412]
  27. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Sep;32(3):365-379 [PMID: 34487290]
  28. Behav Modif. 2003 Jul;27(3):387-411 [PMID: 12841590]
  29. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Mar 18;14:22 [PMID: 32206085]
  30. Work. 2004;22(3):169-82 [PMID: 15156083]
  31. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 May;44(3):331-338 [PMID: 27891567]
  32. Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Aug 1;67(8):864-9 [PMID: 27032661]
  33. Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108 [PMID: 19490148]
  34. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 21;15(7): [PMID: 30037092]
  35. Am J Nurs. 2014 Mar;114(3):53-8 [PMID: 24572533]
  36. Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jun;72(6):712-715 [PMID: 33730884]
  37. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014 Jun;37(2):86-9 [PMID: 24708194]
  38. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;63(7):632-640 [PMID: 28797214]
  39. Front Res Metr Anal. 2021 May 28;6:685591 [PMID: 34124534]
  40. Brain Inform. 2016 Jun;3(2):119-131 [PMID: 27747607]
  41. Health Soc Care Community. 2009 Nov;17(6):619-27 [PMID: 19469914]
  42. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Nov;48(3):271-8 [PMID: 15488041]
  43. Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Nov;62(11):1289-95 [PMID: 22211207]
  44. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008 Summer;32(1):59-62 [PMID: 18614451]
  45. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 24;18(1):145 [PMID: 29793455]
  46. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2008 Spring;31(4):280-90 [PMID: 18407876]
  47. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9:CD011867 [PMID: 28898402]
  48. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):632 [PMID: 34930203]
  49. Int J Integr Care. 2011 Oct;11:e137 [PMID: 22128280]
  50. Brain Behav. 2022 Oct;12(10):e2767 [PMID: 36101902]
  51. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):72-9 [PMID: 21659297]
  52. Community Ment Health J. 2010 Apr;46(2):112-8 [PMID: 19685185]
  53. J Ment Health. 2010 Dec;19(6):523-31 [PMID: 21067367]
  54. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Sep;49(5):848-860 [PMID: 35793011]
  55. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Mar;43(1):9-17 [PMID: 30945917]
  56. BMC Public Health. 2013 May 24;13:503 [PMID: 23706106]
  57. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160 [PMID: 33781993]
  58. Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Nov;58(11):1421-6 [PMID: 17978251]
  59. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021 Aug;28(6):433-445 [PMID: 31976792]
  60. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(13):1250-6 [PMID: 26287452]
  61. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Mar;43(1):2-8 [PMID: 30945915]
  62. J Occup Rehabil. 2023 Jun;33(2):362-374 [PMID: 36329284]
  63. Res Synth Methods. 2020 Nov;11(6):743-759 [PMID: 32845574]
  64. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 May;44(3):311-319 [PMID: 28062932]

MeSH Term

Humans
Rehabilitation, Vocational
Mental Health Services
Cooperative Behavior
Mental Disorders

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0collaborationhealthsectorinvolvedreviewfacilitatorsfoundimplementationvocationalrehabilitationinterventionscoordinatedintegratedCollaborationperformedbarriersincludedattitudetrustprofessionalsmentalcaresecurityoftenVRsupportstakeholderssectorssystematicscreeningconductedanalysisAppraisalqualityCASPgovernancepositivesuccessMentalBACKGROUND:Stakeholderssocialso-calledprogramclientsneedfieldsthereforeimportantstudyprovideoverviewMETHODS:PROSPEROIDCRD42023404823databasesMedlinePubMedn���=���11511WebSciencen���=���4821PSYCINFOn���=���368usedAI-driventoolASReviewprocesstworesearchersindependentlythematiccontentanalysereportedstudiesusingCriticalSkillsProgrammeRESULTS:10511873identifiedarticlesfulltext26finalSixthemesfound:beliefsengagementstructurepracticalissuesclient-centerednessreporting820basedCONCLUSION:towardsbeliefcanenhanceMoreovernegativelackamonghindereddifferentincreasedimprovingattitudesmutualincreasingknowledgeother'sexpertiseAlsosharingstoriesco-locationclearfactorcollaborations'Barriersinterventions:ImplementationproblemsQualitativeRehabilitationReturnworkSocialSystematicVocational

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.