Assessment of Urolithin A effects on muscle endurance, strength, inflammation, oxidative stress, and protein metabolism in male athletes with resistance training: an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Haotian Zhao, Hongkang Zhu, Hezhang Yun, Jingqi Liu, Ge Song, Jin Teng, Dixin Zou, Naiyan Lu, Chang Liu
Author Information
  1. Haotian Zhao: Jiangnan University, Department of physical education, Wuxi, China.
  2. Hongkang Zhu: Jiangnan University, School of Food Science and Technology, Wuxi, China.
  3. Hezhang Yun: Beijing Sport University, School of Sport Science, Beijing, China.
  4. Jingqi Liu: Beijing Sport University, School of Sport Science, Beijing, China.
  5. Ge Song: Beijing Sport University, School of Sport Science, Beijing, China.
  6. Jin Teng: Beijing Sport University, School of Sport Science, Beijing, China.
  7. Dixin Zou: China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing, China.
  8. Naiyan Lu: Jiangnan University, School of Food Science and Technology, Wuxi, China.
  9. Chang Liu: Beijing Sport University, School of Sport Science, Beijing, China. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the impact of Urolithin A (UA) on muscle endurance, muscle strength, inflammatory levels, oxidative stress, and protein metabolism status in resistance-trained male athletes.
METHOD: An 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted with twenty resistance-trained male athletes. Participants were supplemented with 1 g of UA daily. Muscle strength and muscle endurance measures were assessed, and fasting venous blood samples and morning urine samples were collected to evaluate their oxidative stress levels, inflammatory markers, and protein metabolism status.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences observed in terms of dietary energy intake and composition between the two assessments conducted within a 24-hour period. After 8 weeks of UA supplementation, compared to baseline measurements, the UA group exhibited increases in 1RM bench press and squat, although these changes were not statistically significant (Δ = 3.00 ± 0.17 kg,  = 0.051, Δ = 1.35 ± 2.73 kg,  = 0.499). However, significant improvements were noted in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) and repetitions to failure (RTF) performance (Δ = 36.10 ± 0.62 NM,  = 0.000; Δ = 2.00 ± 0.56,  = 0.001). When compared to the placebo group, the UA supplementation for 8 weeks led to an increase in 1RM bench press and squat, although statistical significance was not reached (Δ = 3.50 ± 0.79 kg,  = 0.462; Δ = 2.55 ± 1.36 kg,  = 0.710). Furthermore, the group receiving UA supplementation, compared to the placebo group, showed significant improvements in MVIC and RTF (Δ = 43.50 ± 0.77 NM,  = 0.048; Δ = 2.00 ± 1.22,  = 0.011), indicating that the UA group exhibited superior performance enhancements in these metrics compared to the placebo group. After 8 weeks of UA supplementation, the UA group showed a significant decrease in 3-methylhistidine (3-MH) compared to baseline measurement (Δ=-2.38 ± 1.96 μmol/L,  = 0.049). Additionally, the UA group exhibited a significant increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) compared to baseline (Δ = 0.71 ± 0.21 mg/L,  = 0.001). However, there was no significant changes observed in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) (Δ=-1.00 ± 1.01 pg/mL,  = 0.076), or superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Δ=-0.004 ± 0.72 U/mL,  = 0.996) compared to baseline in the UA group. When compared to the placebo group, there was no significant difference observed in 3-MH in the UA group (Δ=-3.20 ± 0.31 μmol/L,  = 0.36). In terms of inflammation markers, the UA group exhibited a significant decrease in CRP (Δ=-0.79 ± 0.38 mg/L,  = 0.032) compared to the placebo group, whereas there was a decrease in IL-6 without statistical significance (Δ=-1.75 ± 0.45 pg/mL,  = 0.215). Furthermore, the UA group showed a significant decrease in SOD compared to the placebo group (Δ=-4.32 ± 0.90 U/mL,  = 0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: After 8 weeks of UA supplementation at 1 g/day, resistance-trained male athletes showed improvements in muscle strength and endurance. Additionally, UA supplementation was also associated with reduced oxidative stress levels and a decrease in inflammation response levels.

Keywords

References

  1. Open Heart. 2022 Dec;9(2): [PMID: 36522127]
  2. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2021 May;26(3):473-493 [PMID: 33666815]
  3. Sports Med Int Open. 2017 Mar 28;1(2):E80-E88 [PMID: 30539090]
  4. Eur J Nutr. 2016 Apr;55(3):1099-112 [PMID: 25962506]
  5. Cell Rep Med. 2022 May 17;3(5):100633 [PMID: 35584623]
  6. Nat Metab. 2019 Jun;1(6):595-603 [PMID: 32694802]
  7. Trends Mol Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):687-699 [PMID: 34030963]
  8. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016 Apr;11(3):283-9 [PMID: 27068517]
  9. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Sep;117(9):1337 [PMID: 28844251]
  10. Biomedicines. 2021 Feb 15;9(2): [PMID: 33671880]
  11. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2018 Jan;1862(1):61-70 [PMID: 29031765]
  12. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:247504 [PMID: 23710216]
  13. Nat Med. 2016 Aug;22(8):879-88 [PMID: 27400265]
  14. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016 Sep;60(9):1933-43 [PMID: 27060359]
  15. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020 Apr 22;2020:1675957 [PMID: 32377290]
  16. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jan;25(1):178-85 [PMID: 21157384]
  17. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2023 Feb;44(2):321-331 [PMID: 35655094]
  18. Nutrients. 2020 Nov 12;12(11): [PMID: 33198277]
  19. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2022 Jul;232:112462 [PMID: 35567884]
  20. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992 May;24(5):512-20 [PMID: 1569847]
  21. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2022 Mar 22;19(1):1-16 [PMID: 35599921]
  22. J Physiol. 2016 Sep 15;594(18):5081-92 [PMID: 26893258]
  23. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144279 [PMID: 35050355]
  24. Geroscience. 2022 Aug;44(4):2129-2138 [PMID: 35303223]
  25. J Sports Sci Med. 2012 Jun 01;11(2):221-5 [PMID: 24149193]
  26. Nat Neurosci. 2019 Mar;22(3):401-412 [PMID: 30742114]
  27. Sports Med. 1992 Feb;13(2):108-15 [PMID: 1561506]
  28. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Mar;48(3):543-68 [PMID: 26891166]
  29. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 May;35(5):409-418 [PMID: 29482412]
  30. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Nov;37(11):973-980 [PMID: 34809736]
  31. Nutrients. 2021 Oct 25;13(11): [PMID: 34836029]
  32. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Oct;75(4):1545-51 [PMID: 8282602]
  33. J Agric Food Chem. 2022 Sep 28;70(38):11981-11993 [PMID: 36106620]
  34. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 03;22(15): [PMID: 34361099]
  35. J Nutr. 2019 Sep 1;149(9):1491-1492 [PMID: 31172195]
  36. Nutrition. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(7-8):916-22 [PMID: 26059364]

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Double-Blind Method
Oxidative Stress
Muscle Strength
Resistance Training
Young Adult
Physical Endurance
Dietary Supplements
Coumarins
Inflammation
Adult
Muscle, Skeletal
Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Biomarkers

Chemicals

Coumarins
3,8-dihydroxy-6H-dibenzo(b,d)pyran-6-one
Biomarkers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0UA = 0groupsignificantcomparedsupplementationplacebomuscleoxidativestressdecreaseendurancestrengthlevelsproteinmaleathletes8 weeksbaselineexhibitedshowedstudyUrolithinmetabolismresistance-trainedobservedimprovementsperformanceΔ = 2inflammationinflammatorystatus8-weekrandomizeddouble-blindplacebo-controlledconductedsamplesmarkersterms1RMbenchpresssquatalthoughchangesΔ = 300 ± 0HoweverMVICRTF001increasestatisticalsignificance50 ± 0Furthermore00 ± 13-MHAdditionallyCRPIL-6Δ=-1SODΔ=-0BACKGROUND:aimedinvestigateimpactMETHOD:twentyParticipantssupplemented1 gdailyMusclemeasuresassessedfastingvenousbloodmorningurinecollectedevaluateRESULTS:differencesdietaryenergyintakecompositiontwoassessmentswithin24-hourperiodmeasurementsincreasesstatistically17 kg051Δ = 135 ± 273 kg499notedMaximumVoluntaryIsometricContractionrepetitionsfailureΔ = 3610 ± 062 NM00056ledreached79 kg46255 ± 136 kg710receivingΔ = 4377 NM04822011indicatingsuperiorenhancementsmetrics3-methylhistidinemeasurementΔ=-238 ± 196 μmol/L049C-reactiveΔ = 071 ± 021 mg/LInterleukin-601 pg/mL076superoxidedismutase004 ± 072 U/mL996differenceΔ=-320 ± 031 μmol/L3679 ± 038 mg/L032whereaswithout75 ± 045 pg/mL215Δ=-432 ± 090 U/mL041CONCLUSIONS:1 g/dayalsoassociatedreducedresponseAssessmenteffectsresistancetraining:ergogenicaidexercise

Similar Articles

Cited By