Effects of peer-led education on knowledge, attitudes, practices of stoma care, and quality of life in bladder cancer patients after permanent ostomy.

Juan-Ying Ding, Ting-Ting Pan, Xu-Jing Lu, Xiao-Ming You, Jia-Xian Qi
Author Information
  1. Juan-Ying Ding: The First People's Hospital of Linping, Hangzhou, China.
  2. Ting-Ting Pan: The First People's Hospital of Linping, Hangzhou, China.
  3. Xu-Jing Lu: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  4. Xiao-Ming You: The First People's Hospital of Linping, Hangzhou, China.
  5. Jia-Xian Qi: The First People's Hospital of Linping, Hangzhou, China.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of peer-led intervention on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of stoma care, as well as quality of life in bladder cancer patients post-permanent ostomy.
Methods: A series of 340 eligible bladder cancer patients who underwent permanent ostomy from January 2019 to December 2022 were enrolled in this study. These participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (peer-led intervention) and the control group (routine health intervention) using random number table, with 170 cases in each group. A 30-item questionnaire was used to evaluate knowledge, healthy attitudes, and healthy practices (KAP) of disease; the WHO Quality of Life-100 (WHOQOL-100) was utilized to assess the quality of life among patients; and the incidence of complications in two groups were also recorded during six-month intervention. For the comparison of continuous variables within and between groups, paired sample and independent -test were applied. The categorical variables analyzed using test or rank-sum test.
Results: After six-month intervention, 144 participants in the intervention group and 151 participants in the control group were finally retained in this study. The scores of the 20 items in KAP (including basic knowledge of disease, basic knowledge of ostomy, observation of stoma, etc.) in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all ���<���0.05); the scores of 12 items in WHOQOL-100 (including the positive feelings, thinking, learning, memory and concentration, etc.) in the intervention group were markedly higher than those in the control group, while negative feelings and dependence on medical support in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all ���<���0.05); the total rate of complications in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (18.31% vs. 31.13%, ���<���0.05).
Conclusion: The peer-led intervention has a positive effect on improving patients' KAP of stoma care and quality of life and reducing the rate of complications, which enables it to be a favorable intervention approach for patients with permanent ostomy.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2023 Jul-Aug;26(4):419-423 [PMID: 37970311]
  2. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 30;22(10):e16378 [PMID: 33124987]
  3. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Oct;29(10):5711-5719 [PMID: 33661368]
  4. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Jan/Feb;44(1):63-68 [PMID: 27564927]
  5. Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1383-1390 [PMID: 31419023]
  6. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33 [PMID: 33433946]
  7. BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;22(1):8 [PMID: 34983478]
  8. Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2548-2556 [PMID: 35957491]
  9. Work. 2022;72(1):157-169 [PMID: 35431197]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 02;17(21): [PMID: 33147890]
  11. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jun 21;: [PMID: 32690397]
  12. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):344 [PMID: 34090352]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 15;19(6): [PMID: 35329171]
  14. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;44(4):358-362 [PMID: 28549047]
  15. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 May;63(5):10-23 [PMID: 28570245]
  16. Ethn Dis. 2024 Apr 24;33(4):163-169 [PMID: 38854412]
  17. Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Apr;13(2):158-169 [PMID: 30528217]
  18. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 11;9(1): [PMID: 33440740]
  19. Colorectal Dis. 2023 Oct;25(10):2071-2077 [PMID: 37587614]
  20. Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):1009-1017 [PMID: 34334262]
  21. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;18(16): [PMID: 34444262]
  22. Health Educ Res. 2016 Feb;31(1):82-97 [PMID: 26661724]
  23. Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Dec;16(6):719-735 [PMID: 36307372]
  24. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):124-136 [PMID: 37914555]
  25. Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 May;24:96-106 [PMID: 33524902]
  26. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Dec;5(6):628-639 [PMID: 36333236]
  27. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 23;15(1):167 [PMID: 28835235]
  28. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed. 2016 May-Jun;56(3):198-205 [PMID: 27267637]
  29. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 05;16(13): [PMID: 31284381]
  30. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Jul;82(7):493-502 [PMID: 15508194]
  31. Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Nov;86(6):747-752 [PMID: 31228620]
  32. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 06;21(6):e12165 [PMID: 31172962]
  33. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(11):9461-9485 [PMID: 37120782]
  34. J Community Health Nurs. 2016;33(2):71-80 [PMID: 27074403]
  35. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 30;27(3):164-171 [PMID: 33488013]
  36. J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Feb 27;10:58 [PMID: 34084805]
  37. Curr Oncol. 2024 May 02;31(5):2582-2588 [PMID: 38785474]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interventiongroupknowledgeostomycontrolpeer-ledstomaqualitylifepatientsattitudespracticesKAPcarebladdercancerpermanentparticipantscomplicationssignificantly���<���005studyusinghealthydiseaseWHOQOL-100groupssix-monthvariablestestscoresitemsincludingbasicetchigherpositivefeelingslowerrateObjective:investigateeffectswellpost-permanentMethods:series340eligibleunderwentJanuary2019December2022enrolledrandomlyassignedroutinehealthrandomnumbertable170cases30-itemquestionnaireusedevaluateWHOQualityLife-100utilizedassessamongincidencetwoalsorecordedcomparisoncontinuouswithinpairedsampleindependent-testappliedcategoricalanalyzedrank-sumResults:144151finallyretained20observation12thinkinglearningmemoryconcentrationmarkedlynegativedependencemedicalsupporttotal1831%vs3113%Conclusion:effectimprovingpatients'reducingenablesfavorableapproachEffectseducationand

Similar Articles

Cited By