An Integrated Nomogram Combining Deep Learning and Radiomics for Predicting Malignancy of Pulmonary Nodules Using CT-Derived Nodules and Adipose Tissue: A Multicenter Study.

Shidi Miao, Qifan Xuan, Hanbing Xie, Yuyang Jiang, Mengzhuo Sun, Wenjuan Huang, Jing Li, Hongzhuo Qi, Ao Li, Qiujun Wang, Zengyao Liu, Ruitao Wang
Author Information
  1. Shidi Miao: School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China. ORCID
  2. Qifan Xuan: School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.
  3. Hanbing Xie: Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  4. Yuyang Jiang: School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.
  5. Mengzhuo Sun: School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.
  6. Wenjuan Huang: Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  7. Jing Li: Department of Geriatrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  8. Hongzhuo Qi: School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.
  9. Ao Li: School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China.
  10. Qiujun Wang: Department of General Practice, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  11. Zengyao Liu: Department of Interventional Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  12. Ruitao Wang: Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Correctly distinguishing between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules can avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. This study aimed to construct a deep learning radiomics clinical nomogram (DLRCN) for predicting malignancy of pulmonary nodules.
METHODS: One thousand and ninety-eight patients with 6-30���mm pulmonary nodules who received histopathologic diagnosis at 3 centers were included and divided into a primary cohort (PC), an internal test cohort (I-T), and two external test cohorts (E-T1, E-T2). The DLRCN was built by integrating adipose tissue radiomics features, intranodular and perinodular deep learning features, and clinical characteristics for diagnosing malignancy of pulmonary nodules. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. The performance of DLRCN was assessed with respect to its calibration curve, area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA). Furthermore, we compared it with three radiologists. The net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and subgroup analysis were also taken into account.
RESULTS: The incorporation of adipose tissue radiomics features led to significant NRI and IDI (NRI���=���1.028, p���<���0.05, IDI���=���0.137, p���<���0.05). In the I-T, E-T1, and E-T2, the AUCs of DLRCN were 0.946 (95% CI: 0.936, 0.955), 0.948 (95% CI: 0.933, 0.963) and 0.962 (95% CI: 0.945, 0.979), The calibration curve revealed good predictive accuracy between the actual probability and predicted probability (p���>���0.05). DCA showed that the DLRCN was clinically useful. Under equal specificity, the sensitivity of DLRCN increased by 8.6% compared to radiologist assessments. The subgroup analysis conducted on adipose tissue radiomics features further demonstrated their supplementary value in determining the malignancy of pulmonary nodules.
CONCLUSION: The DLRCN demonstrated good performance in predicting the malignancy of pulmonary nodules, which was comparable to radiologist assessments. The adipose tissue radiomics features have notably enhanced the performance of DLRCN.

Keywords

References

  1. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2021 Jul 1;27(4):240-248 [PMID: 33973553]
  2. Semin Cancer Biol. 2023 Feb;89:30-37 [PMID: 36682439]
  3. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 22;102(8):e32899 [PMID: 36827002]
  4. Trends Cancer. 2018 May;4(5):374-384 [PMID: 29709261]
  5. Radiology. 2019 Nov;293(2):441-448 [PMID: 31526256]
  6. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):910-9 [PMID: 24004118]
  7. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):503-513 [PMID: 31995683]
  8. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 02;13(13): [PMID: 34283044]
  9. Int J Mol Sci. 2013 May 21;14(5):10497-538 [PMID: 23698776]
  10. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2022 Sep;41(3):575-587 [PMID: 35941408]
  11. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;19(2):132-146 [PMID: 34663898]
  12. Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 26;11:700158 [PMID: 34381723]
  13. Lancet. 2023 Feb 4;401(10374):390-408 [PMID: 36563698]
  14. Mutat Res. 2015 Jun;776:111-7 [PMID: 26255942]
  15. Eur J Radiol Open. 2022 Aug 02;9:100435 [PMID: 35942077]
  16. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409 [PMID: 21714641]
  17. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019 Mar;15(3):139-154 [PMID: 30459447]
  18. Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77 [PMID: 26579733]
  19. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Feb;40(1):22-30 [PMID: 23870486]
  20. Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44 [PMID: 26017442]
  21. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jun;12(6):3303-3316 [PMID: 32642254]
  22. Clin Chest Med. 2020 Mar;41(1):99-113 [PMID: 32008632]
  23. JAMA. 2022 Jan 18;327(3):264-273 [PMID: 35040882]
  24. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2022 Sep;41(3):549-573 [PMID: 35999486]
  25. Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107 [PMID: 29092951]
  26. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014 Dec;7(12):1173-8 [PMID: 25348855]
  27. Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):228-243 [PMID: 28240562]

Grants

  1. LBH-Z15100/Heilongjiang Provincial Postdoctoral Funding Project

MeSH Term

Humans
Deep Learning
Male
Female
Nomograms
Adipose Tissue
Middle Aged
Lung Neoplasms
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Aged
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
Retrospective Studies
Adult
Radiomics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00DLRCNpulmonarynodulesradiomicsadiposetissuefeaturesmalignancycurvedeeplearningperformanceanalysis0595%CI:clinicalnomogrampredictingcohorttestI-TE-T1E-T2selectioncalibrationDCAcomparedimprovementNRIIDIsubgroupp���<���0goodprobabilityradiologistassessmentsdemonstratedNodulesBACKGROUND:CorrectlydistinguishingbenignmalignantcanavoidunnecessaryinvasiveproceduresstudyaimedconstructMETHODS:Onethousandninety-eightpatients6-30���mmreceivedhistopathologicdiagnosis3centersincludeddividedprimaryPCinternaltwoexternalcohortsbuiltintegratingintranodularperinodularcharacteristicsdiagnosingleastabsoluteshrinkageoperatorLASSOusedfeatureassessedrespectareaAUCdecisionFurthermorethreeradiologistsnetreclassificationintegrateddiscriminationalsotakenaccountRESULTS:incorporationledsignificantNRI���=���1028IDI���=���0137AUCs946936955948933963962945979revealedpredictiveaccuracyactualpredictedp���>���0showedclinicallyusefulequalspecificitysensitivityincreased86%conductedsupplementaryvaluedeterminingCONCLUSION:comparablenotablyenhancedIntegratedNomogramCombiningDeepLearningRadiomicsPredictingMalignancyPulmonaryUsingCT-DerivedAdiposeTissue:A MulticenterStudycomputedtomographymulticentermultimodal

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.