Root causes behind patient safety incidents in the emergency department and suggestions for improving patient safety - an analysis in a Finnish teaching hospital.

Minna Halinen, Hanna Tiirinki, Auvo Rauhala, Sanna Kiili, Tuija Ikonen
Author Information
  1. Minna Halinen: Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, The Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. minna.t.halinen@utu.fi.
  2. Hanna Tiirinki: Department of Social Research, Faculty of Social Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  3. Auvo Rauhala: ��bo Akademi University, Vaasa, Finland.
  4. Sanna Kiili: Finnish Centre for Client and Patient Safety, The Wellbeing Services County of Ostrobothnia, Vaasa, Finland.
  5. Tuija Ikonen: Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, The Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse events occur frequently at emergency departments (ED) because of several risk factors related to varying conditions. It is still unclear, which factors lead to patient safety incident reports. The aim of this study was to explore the root causes behind ED-associated patient safety incidents reported by personnel, and based on the findings, to suggest learning objectives for improving patient safety.
METHODS: The study material included incident reports (n���=���340) which concerned the ED of a teaching hospital over one year. We used a mixed method combining quantitative descriptive statistics and qualitative research by inductive content analysis and deductive Ishikawa root cause analysis.
RESULTS: Most (76.5%) incidents were reported after patient transfer from the ED. Nurses reported 70% of incidents and physicians 7.4%. Of the reports, 40% were related to information flow or management. Incidents were evaluated as no harm (29.4%), mild (46%), moderate (19.7%), and severe (1.2%) harm to the patient. The main consequences for the organization were reputation loss (44.1%) and extra work (38.9%). In the qualitative analysis, nine specific problem groups were found: insufficient introduction, adherence to guidelines and protocols, insufficient human resources, deficient professional skills, medication management deficiencies, incomplete information transfer from the ED, language proficiency, unprofessional behaviour, identification error, and patient-dependent problems. Six organizational themes were identified: medical staff orientation, onboarding and competence requirements; human resources; electronic medical records and information transfer; medication documentation system; interprofessional collaboration; resources for specific patient groups such as geriatric, mental health, and patients with substance abuse disorder. Entirely human factor-related themes could not be defined because their associations with system factors were complex and multifaceted. Individual and organizational learning objectives were addressed, such as adherence to the proper use of instructions and adequate onboarding.
CONCLUSIONS: System factors caused most of the patient safety incidents reported concerning ED. The introduction and training of ED -processes is elementary, as is multiprofessional collaboration. More research is needed about teamwork skills, patients with special needs and non-critical patients, and the reporting of severe incidents.

Keywords

References

  1. West J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 19;22(5):1076-1085 [PMID: 34546883]
  2. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Aug;22(8):656-63 [PMID: 23584208]
  3. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2099-2106 [PMID: 31965525]
  4. BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):1 [PMID: 30606124]
  5. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;49(2):196-205 [PMID: 16997424]
  6. BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2): [PMID: 37188481]
  7. J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;58(2):234-244 [PMID: 31843322]
  8. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Jan;58(1):5-18 [PMID: 24116973]
  9. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e233404 [PMID: 36930151]
  10. Int J Med Inform. 2023 Apr;172:105017 [PMID: 36809716]
  11. BMJ. 1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1154-7 [PMID: 9552960]
  12. BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 28;22(1):173 [PMID: 36303120]
  13. Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Apr;13(2):309-317 [PMID: 34738224]
  14. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768-70 [PMID: 10720363]
  15. Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 Sep 25;5(3):135-142 [PMID: 30016277]
  16. BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):77 [PMID: 31801474]
  17. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;11(10):1035-41 [PMID: 15466145]
  18. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Dec 01;30(10):778-785 [PMID: 29668942]
  19. JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Nov 1;182(11):1190-1198 [PMID: 36215043]
  20. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 21;10(10):e037488 [PMID: 33087370]
  21. J Clin Nurs. 2019 May;28(9-10):1607-1613 [PMID: 30589957]
  22. Open Access Emerg Med. 2010 Jan 20;2:7-16 [PMID: 27147832]
  23. BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):11 [PMID: 33468045]
  24. BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):190 [PMID: 36460968]
  25. Health Econ Policy Law. 2019 Apr;14(2):141-161 [PMID: 29547363]
  26. MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Feb 02;10:30 [PMID: 37485050]
  27. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Sep;32(17-18):5461-5477 [PMID: 36653922]
  28. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jun 24;101(25):e29503 [PMID: 35758389]
  29. J Nurs Manag. 2016 Nov;24(8):1027-1040 [PMID: 27581093]
  30. Cureus. 2022 Jun 23;14(6):e26245 [PMID: 35898382]

MeSH Term

Humans
Emergency Service, Hospital
Patient Safety
Hospitals, Teaching
Finland
Medical Errors
Root Cause Analysis
Qualitative Research
Risk Management
Quality Improvement
Male
Female

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsafetyEDincidentsfactorsreportedanalysisreportstransferinformationhumanresourcespatientsemergencyrelatedincidentstudyrootcausesbehindlearningobjectivesimprovingteachinghospitalqualitativeresearch4%flowmanagementharmseverespecificgroupsinsufficientintroductionadherenceskillsmedicationorganizationalthemesmedicalonboardingsystemcollaborationdepartmentBACKGROUND:AdverseeventsoccurfrequentlydepartmentsseveralriskvaryingconditionsstillunclearleadaimexploreED-associatedpersonnelbasedfindingssuggestMETHODS:materialincludedn���=���340concernedoneyearusedmixedmethodcombiningquantitativedescriptivestatisticsinductivecontentdeductiveIshikawacauseRESULTS:765%Nurses70%physicians7 40%Incidentsevaluated29mild46%moderate197%12%mainconsequencesorganizationreputationloss441%extrawork389%nineproblemfound:guidelinesprotocolsdeficientprofessionaldeficienciesincompletelanguageproficiencyunprofessionalbehaviouridentificationerrorpatient-dependentproblemsSixidentified:stafforientationcompetencerequirementselectronicrecordsdocumentationinterprofessionalgeriatricmentalhealthsubstanceabusedisorderEntirelyfactor-relateddefinedassociationscomplexmultifacetedIndividualaddressedproperuseinstructionsadequateCONCLUSIONS:Systemcausedconcerningtraining-processeselementarymultiprofessionalneededteamworkspecialneedsnon-criticalreportingRootsuggestions-FinnishCommunicationEmergencyIncidentreportInformationIntroductionMedicationrecordPatientTeamworkWorkload

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.