Male infertile couples: an actor-partner interdependence model of attachment styles and fertility pressure.

Huiling Qu, Guyu Liu, Xi Zhang, Xinmei Han, Lei Yan, Li Ge, Yuying Fang
Author Information
  1. Huiling Qu: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
  2. Guyu Liu: Department of Psychology, Reproductive Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan250021, China.
  3. Xi Zhang: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
  4. Xinmei Han: Department of Psychology, Reproductive Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan250021, China.
  5. Lei Yan: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, China.
  6. Li Ge: The Reproductive center of the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan250021, China. geli1128@163.com.
  7. Yuying Fang: Reproductive Medicine Center of Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, China. fangyuying0916@163.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Couples undergoing artificial insemination by donor semen(AID) represent a unique group of infertility patients, the relationship between fertility pressure and attachment styles remains unclear. To investigate the fertility pressure and attachment dimensions in artificial insemination by donor semen(AID) couples, and develop an Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) for patient care.
METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study. From June to September 2021, couples who were about to receive AID treatment in our hospital were assessed using the Fertility Problem Inventory, and the Experiences in Close Relationships(ECR). Dyadic analysis applying the APIM was used.
RESULTS: A total of 448 valid questionnaires were recovered, the effective response rate was 94.9%. The average score of men's fertility pressure was higher than that of women's(P���=���0.021). The score of male attachment anxiety was higher than that of females(P���=���0.038). Attachment avoidance(�����=���0.46) and attachment anxiety(�����=���0.33) in wives significantly impacted their fertility pressure. Attachment avoidance(�����=���0.17) and attachment anxiety(�����=���0.52) in husbands significantly impacted their fertility pressure. The attachment avoidance of wives' had a significant impact on the husbands' fertility pressure(�����=���0.11).
CONCLUSION: Overall, the study revealed that in the couples who use donor sperm to expect pregnancy, the male has higher fertility pressure. Insecure attachment can cause more severe fertility pressure, fertility pressure is also affected by one's partner.

Keywords

References

  1. J Sex Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):2505-15 [PMID: 19619144]
  2. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):594-613 [PMID: 24676468]
  3. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018 Oct-Dec;11(4):315-319 [PMID: 30787514]
  4. Fertil Steril. 2013 Apr;99(5):1324-1331.e1 [PMID: 23290741]
  5. Hum Reprod. 2010 Jun;25(6):1471-80 [PMID: 20338959]
  6. Hum Reprod. 2011 Sep;26(9):2408-14 [PMID: 21727160]
  7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 03;19(5): [PMID: 35270642]
  8. Br J Med Psychol. 1990 Mar;63 ( Pt 1):73-80 [PMID: 2331455]
  9. Cureus. 2023 Apr 9;15(4):e37327 [PMID: 37181965]
  10. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Jul;25(3):540-547 [PMID: 33432870]
  11. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Nov;22(6):643-8 [PMID: 12554255]
  12. Sex Med. 2021 Oct;9(5):100436 [PMID: 34517209]
  13. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 May;200:58-62 [PMID: 26972768]
  14. BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 28;5(1):e006592 [PMID: 25631310]
  15. J Health Psychol. 2016 Jun;21(6):1043-54 [PMID: 25139894]
  16. Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):496-505 [PMID: 22101025]
  17. Hum Reprod. 2009 Nov;24(11):2827-37 [PMID: 19666931]
  18. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Oct;52(10):1640-52 [PMID: 26021885]
  19. Fertil Steril. 1992 Jan;57(1):113-21 [PMID: 1730303]
  20. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Apr;21(4):306 [PMID: 33717249]
  21. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021 Apr;57(2):717-725 [PMID: 32776595]
  22. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1775-1787 [PMID: 32112277]
  23. Health Psychol Open. 2020 Jun 26;7(1):2055102920933073 [PMID: 32637146]
  24. Hum Reprod. 2012 Nov;27(11):3215-25 [PMID: 22926837]
  25. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Dec;25(7):678-83 [PMID: 23063821]
  26. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 Nov;42(9):610 [PMID: 30007777]
  27. Nat Rev Urol. 2018 May;15(5):287-307 [PMID: 29532805]
  28. J Sex Marital Ther. 2008;34(3):248-67 [PMID: 18398763]
  29. Fam Process. 2002 Fall;41(3):405-34 [PMID: 12395567]
  30. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jul;22(7):1946-52 [PMID: 17428881]

Grants

  1. (2018WS346)/the Projects of medical and health technology development program in Shandong province

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Object Attachment
Infertility, Male
Anxiety
Spouses
Surveys and Questionnaires
Insemination, Artificial, Heterologous
Interpersonal Relations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fertilitypressureattachment�����=���0artificialinseminationdonorAIDcouplesstudyhigheranxietyAttachmentavoidancesemeninfertilitystylesAPIMscoreP���=���0malesignificantlyimpactedpartnerMaleinterdependencemodelBACKGROUND:CouplesundergoingrepresentuniquegrouppatientsrelationshipremainsunclearinvestigatedimensionsdevelopActor-PartnerInterdependenceModelpatientcareMETHODS:cross-sectionalJuneSeptember2021receivetreatmenthospitalassessedusingFertilityProblemInventoryExperiencesCloseRelationshipsECRDyadicanalysisapplyingusedRESULTS:total448validquestionnairesrecoveredeffectiveresponserate949%averagemen'swomen's021females0384633wives1752husbandswives'significantimpacthusbands'11CONCLUSION:OverallrevealedusespermexpectpregnancyInsecurecancauseseverealsoaffectedone'sinfertilecouples:actor-partnerActorDonorInfertilityStress

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.