Societal costs of older adults with low back pain seeking chiropractic care: findings from the BACE-C cohort study.

Esther T Maas, Brenda L van der Vossen, Johanna M van Dongen, Alan D Jenks, Sidney M Rubinstein
Author Information
  1. Esther T Maas: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 3, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.t.maas@vu.nl. ORCID
  2. Brenda L van der Vossen: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 3, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  3. Johanna M van Dongen: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 3, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  4. Alan D Jenks: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 3, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  5. Sidney M Rubinstein: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 3, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To describe the societal costs during one year of follow-up among older adults seeking chiropractic care due to a new episode of low back pain (LBP), and to determine what factors predict high societal costs in this population.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study, within chiropractic private practices (n���=���38) in the Netherlands. 223 people���������55 years of age with a new episode of LBP seeking chiropractic care participated. The primary outcome was total societal costs. High societal costs were defined as patients with costs in the top 20th percentile. The final prediction models were obtained using forward selection. Results were presented for the total population and stratified for retirement status. The model's prognostic accuracy (Hosmer-Lemeshow X, Nagelkerke's R) and discriminative ability [area under the receiver operating curve (AUC)] were assessed, and the models were internally validated using bootstrapping.
RESULTS: The mean total annual societal cost per patient was ���5297 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4191-6403]. The biggest cost driver was presenteeism (65% of total costs), and costs were higher among non-retired participants (���7759; 95% CI 6047-9470) than retired participants (���1892; 95% CI 1088-2695). In the total population, younger age [odds ratio (OR): 0.87 for each additional year; 95% CI 0.80-0.95], being male instead of female (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.19-7.44), less alcohol intake (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.20-1.19), working instead of retirement (OR 9.37; 95% CI 1.83-48.04), and more disability at baseline (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.00-1.16) were found to be predictive of high societal costs. Working was found to be the strongest predictor for high societal costs. After internal validation, the model's fit was good, it's explained variance was moderate (28%) and their AUCs could be interpreted as moderate (0.85). For non-pensioners, the same predictive factors were identified as for the entire population. The costs for the retired participants showed too little variation to be able to predict high costs.
CONCLUSIONS: This study estimated the mean total annual societal cost of older adults seeking chiropractic care due to a new episode of LBP at ���5297 (95% CI 4191-6403).These costs were mainly due to high levels of presenteeism, and extensively differed based upon work status.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Econ. 2022 Dec;31(12):2680-2699 [PMID: 36089775]
  2. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213 [PMID: 2748771]
  3. Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99 [PMID: 21225900]
  4. Pain. 1996 May-Jun;65(2-3):197-204 [PMID: 8826507]
  5. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Apr 1;28(1):17 [PMID: 32238185]
  6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4 [PMID: 15928561]
  7. Eur J Pain. 2019 Mar;23(3):495-502 [PMID: 30289190]
  8. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2005 Feb;5(1):23-8 [PMID: 19807557]
  9. Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):124-32 [PMID: 23337223]
  10. Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367 [PMID: 29573870]
  11. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):E1443-E1451 [PMID: 31369481]
  12. Pain. 2021 Nov 1;162(11):2737-2749 [PMID: 33902092]
  13. Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38 [PMID: 20010215]
  14. Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2384-2388 [PMID: 29573871]
  15. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187477 [PMID: 29121647]
  16. Phys Ther. 2017 May 01;97(5):561-570 [PMID: 28340202]
  17. Eur J Pain. 2017 Apr;21(4):705-715 [PMID: 27860026]
  18. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Jul;53(7):688-95 [PMID: 10941945]
  19. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Aug 19;12:193 [PMID: 21854620]
  20. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;31(2):73-86 [PMID: 11132119]
  21. Eur J Pain. 2020 Feb;24(2):325-337 [PMID: 31566839]
  22. Stat Med. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87 [PMID: 8668867]
  23. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Mar-Apr;20(2):9-18 [PMID: 11260963]
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):1714-20 [PMID: 21374895]
  25. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jun 16;39(1):e34 [PMID: 37325977]
  26. Aging Cell. 2019 Feb;18(1):e12861 [PMID: 30488641]
  27. Eur J Pain. 2009 Mar;13(3):280-6 [PMID: 18524652]
  28. Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Oct;12(5):455-67 [PMID: 20526649]
  29. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):781-7 [PMID: 18421511]
  30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:167-172 [PMID: 27825891]
  31. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3115-24 [PMID: 11124727]
  32. Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2368-2383 [PMID: 29573872]
  33. J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):171-89 [PMID: 10154656]
  34. Healthc Policy. 2014 Feb;9(3):68-79 [PMID: 24726075]
  35. Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Aug;24(6):951-965 [PMID: 36161553]
  36. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr 15;49(2):156-63 [PMID: 12687505]
  37. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222 [PMID: 33069326]
  38. BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 20;12(6):e057778 [PMID: 35725262]

Grants

  1. A.21-02/Dutch-Belgian Research Institute of Chiropractic

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Female
Low Back Pain
Aged
Prospective Studies
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Cost of Illness
Manipulation, Chiropractic
Cohort Studies
Health Care Costs

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0costsCIsocietal95%totalchiropractichighOR0adultsseekingpopulation1oldercareduenewepisodebackpainLBPstudycostparticipantsyearamonglowfactorspredictcohortagemodelsusingretirementstatusmodel'smeanannual���5297:presenteeismretiredinsteadfoundpredictivemoderateSocietalBACKGROUND:describeonefollow-updetermineMETHODS:Prospectivewithinprivatepracticesn���=���38Netherlands223people���������55yearsparticipatedprimaryoutcomeHighdefinedpatientstop20thpercentilefinalpredictionobtainedforwardselectionResultspresentedstratifiedprognosticaccuracyHosmer-LemeshowXNagelkerke'sRdiscriminativeability[areareceiveroperatingcurveAUC]assessedinternallyvalidatedbootstrappingRESULTS:perpatient[95%confidenceinterval4191-6403]biggestdriver65%highernon-retired���77596047-9470���18921088-2695younger[oddsratio87additional80-095]malefemale29619-744lessalcoholintake4920-119working93783-4804disabilitybaseline0800-116Workingstrongestpredictorinternalvalidationfitgoodexplainedvariance28%AUCsinterpreted85non-pensionersidentifiedentireshowedlittlevariationableCONCLUSIONS:estimated4191-6403Thesemainlylevelsextensivelydifferedbaseduponworkcare:findingsBACE-CLowOlderPrediction

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.