Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Allen Johnson, Radha Sarawagi, Rajesh Malik, Jitendra Sharma, Abhinav Bhagat
Author Information
  1. Allen Johnson: Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, India. ORCID
  2. Radha Sarawagi: Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India. ORCID
  3. Rajesh Malik: Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India. ORCID
  4. Jitendra Sharma: Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India. ORCID
  5. Abhinav Bhagat: Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India. ORCID

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer presents a significant global health burden. An accurate differentiation between benign and malignant lesions is imperative for timely intervention. While dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is highly sensitive, its specificity is limited. This has led to the exploration of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Objectives: The study aimed to explore the diagnostic utility of DWI in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Method: Assessment of 38 breast lesions using DWI with a value of 800 s/mm, performed with 3 Tesla MRI. The diagnostic performance of two different region of Interest (ROI) placement approaches was compared to obtain a feasible cut-off value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions. The histopathological reports were used as the gold standard.
Results: ADC values of malignant lesions were significantly lower than those of benign lesions (0.84 × 10 mm/s vs. 1.54 × 10 mm/s). The average ADC measured using a small-sized 2D ROI including the darkest part in the ADC map, performed better than the large 2D ROI covering the entire lesion.
Conclusion: Using a cut-off value of 0.98 × 10 mm/s, ADC obtained high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (88.9%) in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Contribution: Utilising quantitative analysis of DWI with ADC value measurement, reliably distinguished between benign and malignant breast lesions in this cohort, especially when employing a higher value of 800 s/mm.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Imaging. 2015 Jan-Feb;39(1):51-5 [PMID: 25457520]
  2. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 05;9:265 [PMID: 18534022]
  3. Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 02;13:938189 [PMID: 36937381]
  4. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2015 Oct-Dec;25(4):397-403 [PMID: 26751011]
  5. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):75-89 [PMID: 17392385]
  6. Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):1883-1892 [PMID: 27578047]
  7. Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1436-1450 [PMID: 31786616]
  8. Clin Imaging. 2016 Sep-Oct;40(5):1047-54 [PMID: 27379441]
  9. Breast. 2022 Dec;66:15-23 [PMID: 36084384]
  10. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):260-6 [PMID: 19542422]
  11. Clin Radiol. 2016 Feb;71(2):170-7 [PMID: 26688549]
  12. Cancer Invest. 2015 May;33(5):159-64 [PMID: 25831024]
  13. Insights Imaging. 2016 Aug;7(4):531-9 [PMID: 27221974]
  14. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Jan 31;29:171 [PMID: 26034724]
  15. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):717-22 [PMID: 22358015]
  16. Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):585-91 [PMID: 15205478]
  17. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 30;12(3):e0174681 [PMID: 28358833]
  18. Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):779-88 [PMID: 16118160]
  19. Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 21;11:694634 [PMID: 34235084]
  20. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Mar 15;25(6):1756-1765 [PMID: 30647080]
  21. Invest Radiol. 2015 Feb;50(2):95-100 [PMID: 25333308]
  22. Oncologist. 2006 May;11(5):435-49 [PMID: 16720843]
  23. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Aug;16(2):172-8 [PMID: 12203765]
  24. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2018 Feb 07;102(1):24 [PMID: 30039037]
  25. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1664-73 [PMID: 20489111]
  26. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Aug;72(3):460-469 [PMID: 32157892]
  27. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Mar-Apr;21(2):123-7 [PMID: 25698095]
  28. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Nov;40(5):1158-64 [PMID: 24923252]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lesionsbenignmalignantbreastADCvalueDWIMRIdistinguishingROI×10mm/scancerspecificitydiffusion-weightedimagingdiagnosticusing800s/mmperformedcut-off02DBackground:BreastpresentssignificantglobalhealthburdenaccuratedifferentiationimperativetimelyinterventiondynamiccontrastenhancedDCE-MRIhighlysensitivelimitedledexplorationObjectives:studyaimedexploreutilityMethod:Assessment383TeslaperformancetwodifferentregionInterestplacementapproachescomparedobtainfeasibleapparentdiffusioncoefficientdifferentiatehistopathologicalreportsusedgoldstandardResults:valuessignificantlylower84vs154averagemeasuredsmall-sizedincludingdarkestpartmapbetterlargecoveringentirelesionConclusion:Using98obtainedhighsensitivity90%889%Contribution:UtilisingquantitativeanalysismeasurementreliablydistinguishedcohortespeciallyemployinghigherUtilitydifferentiatingBI-RADSradiology

Similar Articles

Cited By