A Single-Step Root Coverage Procedure Using Modified Bridge Flap Technique and De-epithelialized Gingival Unit Graft: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Neelima Katti, Devapratim Mohanty, Peri Srivani, Humaira Siddiqui, Subash Chandra Raj, Debajani Baral
Author Information
  1. Neelima Katti: Department of Periodontology, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
  2. Devapratim Mohanty: Department of Periodontology, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
  3. Peri Srivani: Department of Periodontology, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
  4. Humaira Siddiqui: Department of Periodontology, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
  5. Subash Chandra Raj: Department of Periodontology, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
  6. Debajani Baral: Department of Periodontology, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

Abstract

Background: The mucogingival conditions associated with the recession defects at the mandibular anterior region, not only make plaque control difficult to be performed by the patient but also pose a problem in passively advancing the tissues at the recipient site. This surgical technique is used to treat multiple recession defects in the mandibular anterior region.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-five sites in 17 subjects (11 women and 6 men) underwent modified bridge flap and de-epithelized gingival unit graft (d-GUG) as a single-step treatment modality to cover the denuded root surface, as well as increase the width of keratinized gingiva in recession type 1 gingival recession defects in the mandibular anterior region.
Results: Nearly 60% of sites in our study showed complete root coverage, with a mean root coverage percentage of 88.08%. Furthermore, keratinized tissue width, keratinized tissue thickness as well as vestibular depth showed statistically significant increases as compared to baseline levels.
Conclusion: Thus, the modified bridge flap technique using d-GUG within the limitations of our study design, showed promising results in terms of recession coverage as well as management of the difficult mucogingival conditions at the mandibular anterior region.

Keywords

References

  1. Periodontol 2000. 2001;27:72-96 [PMID: 11551301]
  2. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):49-55 [PMID: 35656657]
  3. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 May-Jun;34(3):345-52 [PMID: 24804285]
  4. J Clin Periodontol. 1985 Jan;12(1):69-76 [PMID: 3855873]
  5. J Periodontol. 2004 Dec;75(12):1734-41 [PMID: 15732880]
  6. J Dent (Tehran). 2016 Jun;13(3):184-192 [PMID: 28392815]
  7. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Jan;36(1):68-79 [PMID: 19046326]
  8. J Periodontol. 1967 Nov-Dec;38(6):Suppl:610-6 [PMID: 5237684]
  9. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 02;10:CD007161 [PMID: 30277568]
  10. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):e103-e110 [PMID: 32233187]
  11. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2021 Sep;11(3):155-160 [PMID: 33913627]
  12. J Periodontol. 2000 Feb;71(2):188-201 [PMID: 10711609]
  13. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997 Jun;17(3):260-71 [PMID: 9497718]
  14. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Apr;27(2):133-9 [PMID: 17514885]
  15. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 Mar/Apr;39(2):221-226 [PMID: 30794258]
  16. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 Apr;24(2):165-75 [PMID: 15119887]
  17. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994 Jun;14(3):216-27 [PMID: 7995692]
  18. J Periodontol. 2004 Jun;75(6):886-92 [PMID: 15295957]
  19. J Periodontol. 2013 Jan;84(1):41-50 [PMID: 22390550]
  20. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2022 Jul;7(3):224-233 [PMID: 33899565]
  21. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):653-60 [PMID: 22140667]
  22. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Jul;39(7):674-80 [PMID: 22587305]
  23. J Periodontol. 1987 Feb;58(2):95-102 [PMID: 3546673]
  24. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022 Jul-Aug;26(4):373-377 [PMID: 35959310]
  25. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):41-7 [PMID: 19228088]
  26. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Aug 1;37(8):728-38 [PMID: 20590963]
  27. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:178-94; discussion 195-6 [PMID: 12787218]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0recessionmandibularanteriorregiondefectsrootwellkeratinizedshowedcoveragemucogingivalconditionsdifficulttechniquesitesmodifiedbridgeflapgingivald-GUGwidthstudytissueGingivalBackground:associatedmakeplaquecontrolperformedpatientalsoposeproblempassivelyadvancingtissuesrecipientsitesurgicalusedtreatmultipleMaterialsMethods:Twenty-five17subjects11women6menunderwentde-epithelizedunitgraftsingle-steptreatmentmodalitycoverdenudedsurfaceincreasegingivatype1Results:Nearly60%completemeanpercentage8808%FurthermorethicknessvestibulardepthstatisticallysignificantincreasescomparedbaselinelevelsConclusion:ThususingwithinlimitationsdesignpromisingresultstermsmanagementSingle-StepRootCoverageProcedureUsingModifiedBridgeFlapTechniqueDe-epithelializedUnitGraft:ProspectiveClinicalStudyperiodontalsurgerysoft-tissuegrafts

Similar Articles

Cited By