Prevalence of neurophobia among medical students and young doctors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fei Han, Ding-Ding Zhang, Yao Zhang, Li-Xin Zhou, Yi-Cheng Zhu, Jun Ni
Author Information
  1. Fei Han: Department of Neurology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing, 100730, China.
  2. Ding-Ding Zhang: Center for Prevention and Early Intervention, National Infrastructures for Translational Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine & Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  3. Yao Zhang: Department of Neurology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing, 100730, China.
  4. Li-Xin Zhou: Department of Neurology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing, 100730, China.
  5. Yi-Cheng Zhu: Department of Neurology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing, 100730, China.
  6. Jun Ni: Department of Neurology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Beijing, 100730, China. pumchnijun@163.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neurophobia is a global phenomenon, that influences both medical students and postgraduate trainees. We aimed to analyze the prevalence of neurophobia by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on neurophobia, and potential associated risk factors.
METHODS: The search was done in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases for studies reporting neurophobia among medical students and young doctors for the period up to March 18, 2024. The overall prevalence and scores of four subcomponents of neurophobia were pooled. The potential heterogeneity was tested through meta-regression/subgroup analyses/influence analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty-four studies from 30 countries met the inclusion criteria and involved 10,395 responding individuals. The estimated overall pooled prevalence of neurophobia was 46% (95%CI, 35-57%; I���=���98%). The result of the meta-regression revealed that geographic region was significantly associated with the prevalence (p���=���0.006). The pooled scores of the four subcomponents of neurophobia were: difficulty 3.79 (95%CI, 3.47-4.12, I���=���99%), confidence 2.81 (95%CI, 2.39-3.24, I���=���99.5%), interest 3.22 (95%CI, 2.84-3.61, I���=���99.6%), and knowledge 2.73 (95%CI, 2.39-3.06, I���=���98.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Neurophobia was widely prevalent among medical students and young doctors. The high prevalence and severity highlight the need for targeted interventions to reduce neurophobia.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):447 [PMID: 37328733]
  2. BMC Med Educ. 2014 May 20;14:98 [PMID: 24884854]
  3. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  4. BMC Med Educ. 2011 Oct 30;11:91 [PMID: 22035246]
  5. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;65(9):934-9 [PMID: 22742910]
  6. Arch Neurol. 1994 Apr;51(4):328-9 [PMID: 8155008]
  7. Rev Neurol. 2023 Jun 1;76(11):351-359 [PMID: 37231548]
  8. Neurology. 2019 Mar 26;92(13):619-626 [PMID: 30796141]
  9. Eur J Neurol. 2007 Oct;14(10):1109-12 [PMID: 17880566]
  10. Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 06;37:223 [PMID: 33520062]
  11. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):336 [PMID: 32993634]
  12. BMC Med Educ. 2013 Dec 09;13:164 [PMID: 24321477]
  13. BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jul 01;9:39 [PMID: 19570231]
  14. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Oct 21;14:225 [PMID: 25335431]
  15. J Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar 15;434:120161 [PMID: 35093723]
  16. Neurology. 2013 Jul 30;81(5):479-86 [PMID: 23783750]
  17. Rev Neurol. 2023 Dec 16;77(12):285-291 [PMID: 38095052]
  18. Med Teach. 2014 Dec;36(12):1043-50 [PMID: 24896639]
  19. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2013 Nov;42(11):559-66 [PMID: 24356651]
  20. Postgrad Med J. 2016 Jun;92(1088):318-21 [PMID: 26792634]
  21. BMC Med Educ. 2010 May 20;10:36 [PMID: 20487554]
  22. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):453 [PMID: 34454502]
  23. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Apr;40(4):689-694 [PMID: 36528784]
  24. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 2;23(1):824 [PMID: 37919684]
  25. Neurology. 2013 Jul 30;81(5):470-8 [PMID: 23596071]
  26. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 30;9(8):e027369 [PMID: 31473611]
  27. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 May;72(5):557-9 [PMID: 11971033]
  28. World Neurosurg. 2014 Sep-Oct;82(3-4):266-9 [PMID: 24954255]
  29. BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jun 23;10:49 [PMID: 20573257]

Grants

  1. 2024yjsjg022/Educator Project of Peking Union Medical College

MeSH Term

Humans
Phobic Disorders
Physicians
Prevalence
Risk Factors
Students, Medical

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0neurophobiaprevalence95%CI2medicalstudentsNeurophobiareviewstudiesamongyoungpooled3systematicmeta-analysispotentialassociateddoctorsoverallscoresfoursubcomponents39-3I���=���99PrevalenceBACKGROUND:globalphenomenoninfluencespostgraduatetraineesaimedanalyzeconductingriskfactorsMETHODS:searchdonePubMedEMBASEScopusdatabasesreportingperiodMarch182024heterogeneitytestedmeta-regression/subgroupanalyses/influenceanalysisRESULTS:Twenty-four30countriesmetinclusioncriteriainvolved10395respondingindividualsestimated46%35-57%I���=���98%resultmeta-regressionrevealedgeographicregionsignificantlyp���=���0006were:difficulty7947-412I���=���99%confidence81245%interest2284-3616%knowledge7306I���=���981%CONCLUSIONS:widelyprevalenthighseverityhighlightneedtargetedinterventionsreducedoctors:Meta-analysisNeurologyeducationSystematic

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.