Does radiofrequency radiation impact sleep? A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study.

Nicole Bijlsma, Russell Conduit, Gerard Kennedy, Marc Cohen
Author Information
  1. Nicole Bijlsma: School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
  2. Russell Conduit: School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
  3. Gerard Kennedy: School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
  4. Marc Cohen: The Extreme Wellness Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Abstract

The most common source of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) exposures during sleep includes digital devices, yet there are no studies investigating the impact of multi-night exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted from a baby monitor on sleep under real-world conditions in healthy adults. Given the rise in the number of people reporting to be sensitive to manmade electromagnetic fields, the ubiquitous use of Wi-Fi enabled digital devices and the lack of real-world data, we investigated the effect of 2.45 GHz radiofrequency exposure during sleep on subjective sleep quality, and objective sleep measures, heart rate variability and actigraphy in healthy adults. This pilot study was a 4-week randomised, double-blind, crossover trial of 12 healthy adults. After a one-week run-in period, participants were randomised to exposure from either an active or inactive (sham) baby monitor for 7 nights and then crossed over to the alternate intervention after a one-week washout period. Subjective and objective assessments of sleep included the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale (PIRS-20), electroencephalography (EEG), actigraphy and heart rate variability (HRV) derived from electrocardiogram. Sleep quality was reduced significantly ( < 0.05) and clinically meaningful during RF-EMF exposure compared to sham-exposure as indicated by the PIRS-20 scores. Furthermore, at higher frequencies (gamma, beta and theta bands), EEG power density significantly increased during the Non-Rapid Eye Movement sleep ( < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in HRV or actigraphy were detected. Our findings suggest that exposure to a 2.45 GHz radiofrequency device (baby monitor) may impact sleep in some people under real-world conditions however further large-scale real-world investigations with specified dosimetry are required to confirm these findings.

Keywords

References

  1. Bioelectromagnetics. 2017 Jul;38(5):329-338 [PMID: 28426166]
  2. Am J Hum Biol. 2010 Sep-Oct;22(5):613-8 [PMID: 20737608]
  3. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Jan;32(1):4-14 [PMID: 20857453]
  4. Sleep Med Clin. 2017 Mar;12(1):1-22 [PMID: 28159089]
  5. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212373 [PMID: 33749768]
  6. Brain Stimul. 2013 Sep;6(5):805-11 [PMID: 23482083]
  7. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Dec 1;88(12):887-896F [PMID: 21124713]
  8. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:924184 [PMID: 24812443]
  9. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  10. Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Dec;2(12):e512-e514 [PMID: 30526934]
  11. Psychophysiology. 2010 Nov;47(6):1127-33 [PMID: 20456661]
  12. Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;142(9):969-990 [PMID: 27416139]
  13. Sleep. 2006 Sep;29(9):1155-73 [PMID: 17040003]
  14. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019 Jul;40(5):291-318 [PMID: 31215052]
  15. Sleep Med Rev. 2019 Oct;47:28-38 [PMID: 31252334]
  16. Int J Radiat Biol. 2002 Aug;78(8):659-69 [PMID: 12194749]
  17. Environ Int. 2020 Jul;140:105687 [PMID: 32276731]
  18. Environ Res. 2019 Aug;175:274-286 [PMID: 31146099]
  19. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007 May;28(4):316-25 [PMID: 17216609]
  20. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2019 Jul - Sep;781:53-62 [PMID: 31416578]
  21. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Dec;32(8):593-609 [PMID: 21769898]
  22. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1344:169-188 [PMID: 34773232]
  23. J Sleep Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):50-8 [PMID: 21489004]
  24. Occup Environ Med. 2006 May;63(5):307-13 [PMID: 16621850]
  25. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 28;16(9): [PMID: 31035391]
  26. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;170(12):1202-1208 [PMID: 27802500]
  27. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:139-66 [PMID: 16318592]
  28. Health Phys. 2020 May;118(5):483-524 [PMID: 32167495]
  29. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 11;21(6): [PMID: 32168876]
  30. Semin Neurol. 2009 Sep;29(4):320-39 [PMID: 19742409]
  31. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016 Sep;75(Pt B):43-51 [PMID: 26300312]
  32. Bioelectromagnetics. 2012 Jan;33(1):86-93 [PMID: 21812009]
  33. Environ Res. 2016 Feb;145:50-60 [PMID: 26618505]
  34. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 Jul;228:113550 [PMID: 32408065]
  35. Sleep. 1992 Apr;15(2):173-84 [PMID: 11032543]
  36. Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul 15;186(2):210-219 [PMID: 28398549]
  37. Clocks Sleep. 2021 Jan 22;3(1):66-86 [PMID: 33499010]
  38. J Sleep Res. 2019 Aug;28(4):e12813 [PMID: 30648318]
  39. Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 20;8(1):18010 [PMID: 30573783]
  40. Environ Int. 2012 May;41:15-28 [PMID: 22245541]
  41. BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):1205 [PMID: 37344806]
  42. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:586-604 [PMID: 28757454]
  43. Sleep Med. 2017 Apr;32:246-256 [PMID: 27743803]
  44. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 27;17(23): [PMID: 33261154]
  45. Radiat Res. 2015 Dec;184(6):568-77 [PMID: 26600173]
  46. Sleep Med Rev. 2020 Oct;53:101333 [PMID: 32485517]
  47. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015 Apr;36(3):169-77 [PMID: 25690404]

MeSH Term

Humans
Cross-Over Studies
Pilot Projects
Double-Blind Method
Male
Adult
Female
Radio Waves
Actigraphy
Heart Rate
Electromagnetic Fields
Sleep
Electroencephalography
Sleep Quality
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sleepexposurereal-worldimpactelectromagneticfieldsbabymonitorhealthyadultsradiofrequencyheartratevariabilityactigraphyrandomisedEEGRF-EMFdigitaldevicesconditionspeopleWi-Fi245 GHzqualityobjectivepilotstudydouble-blindcrossoverone-weekperiodPIRS-20HRVsignificantly< 005findingsradiationcommonsourceRadiofrequencyElectromagneticFieldexposuresincludesyetstudiesinvestigatingmulti-nightemittedGivenrisenumberreportingsensitivemanmadeubiquitoususeenabledlackdatainvestigatedeffectsubjectivemeasures4-weektrial12run-inparticipantseitheractiveinactivesham7nightscrossedalternateinterventionwashoutSubjectiveassessmentsincludedPittsburghInsomniaRatingScaleelectroencephalographyderivedelectrocardiogramSleepreducedclinicallymeaningfulcomparedsham-exposureindicatedscoresFurthermorehigherfrequenciesgammabetathetabandspowerdensityincreasedNon-RapidEyeMovementstatisticallysignificantdifferencesdetectedsuggestdevicemayhoweverlarge-scaleinvestigationsspecifieddosimetryrequiredconfirmsleep?placebo-controlledelectropollutioninsomnianon-ionising

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.