Does radiofrequency radiation impact sleep? A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study.

Nicole Bijlsma, Russell Conduit, Gerard Kennedy, Marc Cohen
Author Information
  1. Nicole Bijlsma: School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
  2. Russell Conduit: School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
  3. Gerard Kennedy: School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
  4. Marc Cohen: The Extreme Wellness Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Abstract

The most common source of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) exposures during sleep includes digital devices, yet there are no studies investigating the impact of multi-night exposure to electromagnetic fields emitted from a baby monitor on sleep under real-world conditions in healthy adults. Given the rise in the number of people reporting to be sensitive to manmade electromagnetic fields, the ubiquitous use of Wi-Fi enabled digital devices and the lack of real-world data, we investigated the effect of 2.45���GHz radiofrequency exposure during sleep on subjective sleep quality, and objective sleep measures, heart rate variability and actigraphy in healthy adults. This pilot study was a 4-week randomised, double-blind, crossover trial of 12 healthy adults. After a one-week run-in period, participants were randomised to exposure from either an active or inactive (sham) baby monitor for 7 nights and then crossed over to the alternate intervention after a one-week washout period. Subjective and objective assessments of sleep included the Pittsburgh Insomnia Rating Scale (PIRS-20), electroencephalography (EEG), actigraphy and heart rate variability (HRV) derived from electrocardiogram. Sleep quality was reduced significantly (���<���0.05) and clinically meaningful during RF-EMF exposure compared to sham-exposure as indicated by the PIRS-20 scores. Furthermore, at higher frequencies (gamma, beta and theta bands), EEG power density significantly increased during the Non-Rapid Eye Movement sleep (���<���0.05). No statistically significant differences in HRV or actigraphy were detected. Our findings suggest that exposure to a 2.45���GHz radiofrequency device (baby monitor) may impact sleep in some people under real-world conditions however further large-scale real-world investigations with specified dosimetry are required to confirm these findings.

Keywords

References

  1. Bioelectromagnetics. 2017 Jul;38(5):329-338 [PMID: 28426166]
  2. Am J Hum Biol. 2010 Sep-Oct;22(5):613-8 [PMID: 20737608]
  3. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Jan;32(1):4-14 [PMID: 20857453]
  4. Sleep Med Clin. 2017 Mar;12(1):1-22 [PMID: 28159089]
  5. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212373 [PMID: 33749768]
  6. Brain Stimul. 2013 Sep;6(5):805-11 [PMID: 23482083]
  7. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Dec 1;88(12):887-896F [PMID: 21124713]
  8. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:924184 [PMID: 24812443]
  9. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  10. Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Dec;2(12):e512-e514 [PMID: 30526934]
  11. Psychophysiology. 2010 Nov;47(6):1127-33 [PMID: 20456661]
  12. Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;142(9):969-990 [PMID: 27416139]
  13. Sleep. 2006 Sep;29(9):1155-73 [PMID: 17040003]
  14. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019 Jul;40(5):291-318 [PMID: 31215052]
  15. Sleep Med Rev. 2019 Oct;47:28-38 [PMID: 31252334]
  16. Int J Radiat Biol. 2002 Aug;78(8):659-69 [PMID: 12194749]
  17. Environ Int. 2020 Jul;140:105687 [PMID: 32276731]
  18. Environ Res. 2019 Aug;175:274-286 [PMID: 31146099]
  19. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007 May;28(4):316-25 [PMID: 17216609]
  20. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2019 Jul - Sep;781:53-62 [PMID: 31416578]
  21. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Dec;32(8):593-609 [PMID: 21769898]
  22. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1344:169-188 [PMID: 34773232]
  23. J Sleep Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):50-8 [PMID: 21489004]
  24. Occup Environ Med. 2006 May;63(5):307-13 [PMID: 16621850]
  25. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 28;16(9): [PMID: 31035391]
  26. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;170(12):1202-1208 [PMID: 27802500]
  27. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:139-66 [PMID: 16318592]
  28. Health Phys. 2020 May;118(5):483-524 [PMID: 32167495]
  29. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 11;21(6): [PMID: 32168876]
  30. Semin Neurol. 2009 Sep;29(4):320-39 [PMID: 19742409]
  31. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016 Sep;75(Pt B):43-51 [PMID: 26300312]
  32. Bioelectromagnetics. 2012 Jan;33(1):86-93 [PMID: 21812009]
  33. Environ Res. 2016 Feb;145:50-60 [PMID: 26618505]
  34. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 Jul;228:113550 [PMID: 32408065]
  35. Sleep. 1992 Apr;15(2):173-84 [PMID: 11032543]
  36. Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul 15;186(2):210-219 [PMID: 28398549]
  37. Clocks Sleep. 2021 Jan 22;3(1):66-86 [PMID: 33499010]
  38. J Sleep Res. 2019 Aug;28(4):e12813 [PMID: 30648318]
  39. Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 20;8(1):18010 [PMID: 30573783]
  40. Environ Int. 2012 May;41:15-28 [PMID: 22245541]
  41. BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):1205 [PMID: 37344806]
  42. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:586-604 [PMID: 28757454]
  43. Sleep Med. 2017 Apr;32:246-256 [PMID: 27743803]
  44. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 27;17(23): [PMID: 33261154]
  45. Radiat Res. 2015 Dec;184(6):568-77 [PMID: 26600173]
  46. Sleep Med Rev. 2020 Oct;53:101333 [PMID: 32485517]
  47. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015 Apr;36(3):169-77 [PMID: 25690404]

MeSH Term

Humans
Cross-Over Studies
Pilot Projects
Double-Blind Method
Male
Adult
Female
Radio Waves
Actigraphy
Heart Rate
Electromagnetic Fields
Sleep
Electroencephalography
Sleep Quality
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sleepexposurereal-worldimpactelectromagneticfieldsbabymonitorhealthyadultsradiofrequencyheartratevariabilityactigraphyrandomisedEEGRF-EMFdigitaldevicesconditionspeopleWi-Fi245���GHzqualityobjectivepilotstudydouble-blindcrossoverone-weekperiodPIRS-20HRVsignificantly���<���005findingsradiationcommonsourceRadiofrequencyElectromagneticFieldexposuresincludesyetstudiesinvestigatingmulti-nightemittedGivenrisenumberreportingsensitivemanmadeubiquitoususeenabledlackdatainvestigatedeffectsubjectivemeasures4-weektrial12run-inparticipantseitheractiveinactivesham7nightscrossedalternateinterventionwashoutSubjectiveassessmentsincludedPittsburghInsomniaRatingScaleelectroencephalographyderivedelectrocardiogramSleepreducedclinicallymeaningfulcomparedsham-exposureindicatedscoresFurthermorehigherfrequenciesgammabetathetabandspowerdensityincreasedNon-RapidEyeMovementstatisticallysignificantdifferencesdetectedsuggestdevicemayhoweverlarge-scaleinvestigationsspecifieddosimetryrequiredconfirmsleep?placebo-controlledelectropollutioninsomnianon-ionising

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.