Neural dynamics of shifting attention between perception and working-memory contents.

Daniela Gresch, Sage E P Boettcher, Chetan Gohil, Freek van Ede, Anna C Nobre
Author Information
  1. Daniela Gresch: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom. ORCID
  2. Sage E P Boettcher: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom. ORCID
  3. Chetan Gohil: Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom. ORCID
  4. Freek van Ede: Institute for Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam, Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands. ORCID
  5. Anna C Nobre: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom. ORCID

Abstract

In everyday tasks, our focus of attention shifts seamlessly between contents in the sensory environment and internal memory representations. Yet, research has mainly considered external and internal attention in isolation. We used magnetoencephalography to compare the neural dynamics of shifting attention to visual contents within vs. between the external and internal domains. Participants performed a combined perception and working-memory task in which two sequential cues guided attention to upcoming (external) or memorized (internal) sensory information. Critically, the second cue could redirect attention to visual content within the same or alternative domain as the first cue. Multivariate decoding unveiled distinct patterns of human brain activity when shifting attention within vs. between domains. Brain activity distinguishing within- from between-domain shifts was broadly distributed and highly dynamic. Intriguingly, crossing domains did not invoke an additional stage prior to shifting attention. Alpha lateralization, a canonical marker of shifting spatial attention, showed no delay when cues redirected attention to the same vs. alternative domain. Instead, evidence suggested that neural states associated with a given domain linger and influence subsequent shifts of attention within vs. between domains. Our findings provide critical insights into the neural dynamics that govern attentional shifts between perception and working memory.

Keywords

References

  1. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Oct;27(10):2019-34 [PMID: 26042457]
  2. Neurosci Conscious. 2022 Nov 19;2022(1):niac016 [PMID: 36415846]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 26;105(34):12569-74 [PMID: 18723676]
  4. Mem Cognit. 1986 May;14(3):238-45 [PMID: 3736397]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50): [PMID: 34880133]
  6. J Neurosci. 2006 Feb 1;26(5):1429-38 [PMID: 16452666]
  7. Vision Res. 2003 Jan;43(2):149-64 [PMID: 12536137]
  8. Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 15;195:444-453 [PMID: 30951848]
  9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Apr;29(4):677-697 [PMID: 27779910]
  10. Psychol Res. 2000;63(3-4):212-33 [PMID: 11004877]
  11. J Neurosci. 2023 Sep 20;43(38):6538-6552 [PMID: 37607818]
  12. Cognition. 2024 Apr;245:105731 [PMID: 38278040]
  13. Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 15;175:91-99 [PMID: 29604457]
  14. J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 14;42(37):7110-7120 [PMID: 35927036]
  15. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2905-19 [PMID: 21291314]
  16. Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Mar;21(5):1423-31 [PMID: 15813952]
  17. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Nov 15;15(8):1176-94 [PMID: 14709235]
  18. Nat Neurosci. 2019 Mar;22(3):477-483 [PMID: 30718904]
  19. Neuroimage. 2017 Nov 15;162:73-85 [PMID: 28847491]
  20. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Oct;45(10):1399-1414 [PMID: 31343243]
  21. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Oct 09;13:348 [PMID: 31649517]
  22. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul;11(7):290-8 [PMID: 17548231]
  23. Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Oct;48(7):2509-2515 [PMID: 29068095]
  24. Sci Adv. 2021 Mar 24;7(13): [PMID: 33762341]
  25. J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 13;26(37):9494-502 [PMID: 16971533]
  26. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Nov 04;4:186 [PMID: 21119777]
  27. Cell Rep. 2022 Apr 12;39(2):110676 [PMID: 35417680]
  28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Sep;46(9):912-925 [PMID: 32378935]
  29. Biol Psychol. 2021 Jul;163:108119 [PMID: 34019967]
  30. Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 8;33(12):7608-7618 [PMID: 37005059]
  31. Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):601-605 [PMID: 33790467]
  32. eNeuro. 2018 Oct 10;5(4): [PMID: 30310862]
  33. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:73-101 [PMID: 19575619]
  34. Neuron. 2019 Oct 9;104(1):132-146 [PMID: 31600510]
  35. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):1839-60 [PMID: 27098647]
  36. J Neurosci. 2000 Mar 15;20(6):RC63 [PMID: 10704517]
  37. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106(46):19569-74 [PMID: 19887644]
  38. Cortex. 2021 Oct;143:29-46 [PMID: 34371378]
  39. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Sep 03;9:123 [PMID: 26388748]
  40. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25 [PMID: 7367577]
  41. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):229-37 [PMID: 16971677]
  42. J Neurophysiol. 2011 Mar;105(3):1318-26 [PMID: 21228304]
  43. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 19;121(47):e2406061121 [PMID: 39536078]
  44. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Mar;27(3):492-508 [PMID: 25244118]
  45. Cortex. 2022 Aug;153:66-86 [PMID: 35597052]
  46. Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:137-165 [PMID: 35961038]
  47. Conscious Cogn. 2017 Aug;53:165-175 [PMID: 28689088]
  48. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):203-10 [PMID: 24593982]
  49. Neuroimage. 2023 Aug 1;276:120221 [PMID: 37290674]
  50. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 20;106(42):17974-9 [PMID: 19805050]
  51. Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jun;20(6):864-871 [PMID: 28414333]
  52. PLoS Biol. 2021 Oct 21;19(10):e3001436 [PMID: 34673775]
  53. Cereb Cortex. 2016 Apr;26(4):1831-42 [PMID: 26865653]
  54. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul;85(5):1398-1408 [PMID: 36854926]
  55. Mem Cognit. 1990 Mar;18(2):119-27 [PMID: 2319955]
  56. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul;19(7):394-405 [PMID: 26051384]
  57. Neuroimage. 2023 Aug 15;277:120253 [PMID: 37385392]
  58. Neuron. 1999 Apr;22(4):751-61 [PMID: 10230795]
  59. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Apr;16(3):363-73 [PMID: 15072672]
  60. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jun;21(6):449-461 [PMID: 28454719]
  61. Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525 [PMID: 21549742]

Grants

  1. 850636/EC | European Research Council (ERC)
  2. 203139/Z/16/Z/Wellcome Trust (WT)
  3. 104571/Z/14/Z/Wellcome Trust (WT)
  4. 220020448/James S. McDonnell Foundation (JSMF)
  5. 14721/Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)
  6. /Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Humans
Attention
Memory, Short-Term
Magnetoencephalography
Male
Female
Adult
Brain
Young Adult
Visual Perception
Cues

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attentioninternalshiftingshiftsexternalwithinvsdomainscontentsneuraldynamicsperceptiondomainsensorymemoryvisualworking-memorycuescuealternativedecodingactivityeverydaytasksfocusseamlesslyenvironmentrepresentationsYetresearchmainlyconsideredisolationusedmagnetoencephalographycompareParticipantsperformedcombinedtasktwosequentialguidedupcomingmemorizedinformationCriticallysecondredirectcontentfirstMultivariateunveileddistinctpatternshumanbrainBraindistinguishingwithin-between-domainbroadlydistributedhighlydynamicIntriguinglycrossinginvokeadditionalstagepriorAlphalateralizationcanonicalmarkerspatialshoweddelayredirectedInsteadevidencesuggestedstatesassociatedgivenlingerinfluencesubsequentfindingsprovidecriticalinsightsgovernattentionalworkingNeuralMEGalpha

Similar Articles

Cited By