Why do undergraduate medical students choose medical humanities? A cross-sectional study at an Italian University.

Francesca Tusoni, Laura Giusti, Annalisa Iagnemma, Stefano Necozione, Alessandro Franceschini, Vincenza Ferrara, Silvio Romano, Vincenza Cofini, Leila Fabiani
Author Information
  1. Francesca Tusoni: Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
  2. Laura Giusti: Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
  3. Annalisa Iagnemma: Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy. annalisa.iagnemma@graduate.univaq.it.
  4. Stefano Necozione: Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
  5. Alessandro Franceschini: SIPeM Italian Society for Medical Pedagogy, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
  6. Vincenza Ferrara: Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy.
  7. Silvio Romano: Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
  8. Vincenza Cofini: Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
  9. Leila Fabiani: Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical humanities can contribute positively to clinical practice and medical education. Therefore, in many countries, medical schools have been progressively incorporating medical humanities into their curriculum. In Italy, only a few medical schools offer a variety of medical humanities courses, often as elective. What induces Italian medical students to take a medical humanities course has not yet been explored. The aim of this study is to fill this gap by investigating whether academic performance, sociodemographic and psychological variables may influence student motivation.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a medical school and collected data from 260 medical students, from the 3rd to the 6th year of the degree course. The students who chose to take a course in Medical Humanities were compared with those who chose not to take such a course, analysing numeric variables (age, grade point average, psychometric scores) and categorical variables (gender, nationality, educational level, living conditions). Motivations were investigated by open-ended questions and categorized prior to analyses.
RESULTS: The two subgroups showed no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics, except for age, which was lower for the students who chose to take a medical humanities course (p < 0.001). Among the psychometric scores, only the anxiety score differed significantly between the groups, being lower for the students who chose a medical humanities course (p < 0.05). Regarding academic performance, the number of examinations passed was similar between the groups, while the average grade was lower for the students taking the course (p < 0.01). Interest in the humanities and their educational potential were the main reasons for choosing to take a course in medical humanities (76.2%). Concurrent commitments and lack of time were the major obstacles to this choice (39%).
CONCLUSIONS: Age, anxiety levels and academic performance seem to be inversely associated with the choice to take a medical humanities course. Considering the workload due to curricular activities when planning elective courses could increase student participation.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 18;11(24): [PMID: 36556117]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 05;19(13): [PMID: 35805872]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 31;16(15): [PMID: 31370266]
  4. Acta Biomed. 2018 Jan 16;88(4):512-513 [PMID: 29350670]
  5. Acad Med. 2016 Mar;91(3):345-50 [PMID: 26200577]
  6. Acad Med. 2009 Feb;84(2):192-8 [PMID: 19174663]
  7. GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Feb 15;39(1):Doc13 [PMID: 35368844]
  8. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 24;20(1): [PMID: 36612590]
  9. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):159 [PMID: 35260157]
  10. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):991-7 [PMID: 18612730]
  11. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):179 [PMID: 33761941]
  12. Clin Ter. 2020 May-Jun;171(3):e252-e259 [PMID: 32323715]
  13. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231845 [PMID: 32302354]
  14. Global Health. 2021 Apr 6;17(1):39 [PMID: 33823897]
  15. Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7 [PMID: 18064739]
  16. Cureus. 2023 Oct 3;15(10):e46433 [PMID: 37927762]
  17. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96 [PMID: 6668417]
  18. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):925 [PMID: 38057775]
  19. Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1742964 [PMID: 32180537]
  20. Am J Med. 2016 Dec;129(12):1334-1337 [PMID: 27566497]
  21. Psychosomatics. 1971 Nov-Dec;12(6):371-9 [PMID: 5172928]
  22. Rev Educ Res. 2022 Feb;92(1):46-72 [PMID: 35330866]
  23. Acad Med. 2019 Oct;94(10):1422-1424 [PMID: 31299677]
  24. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):775 [PMID: 37853376]
  25. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 28;10:1214320 [PMID: 37700767]
  26. Acad Med. 2003 Oct;78(10):1048-53 [PMID: 14534108]
  27. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 9;21(1):335 [PMID: 34107926]
  28. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Feb;28(1):86-92 [PMID: 34105226]
  29. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9): [PMID: 35564409]
  30. Psychol Health Med. 2022 Jan;27(1):69-80 [PMID: 33602027]
  31. J Med Humanit. 2017 Dec;38(4):445-457 [PMID: 28589308]
  32. Med Teach. 2011;33(5):e242-62 [PMID: 21517676]
  33. Med Teach. 2019 May;41(5):492-496 [PMID: 30134753]
  34. BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 15;9(1):142 [PMID: 34526153]
  35. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011 Dec;24(3):563 [PMID: 22267351]
  36. Braz J Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 01;43(1):35-42 [PMID: 32696807]
  37. J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1267-1274 [PMID: 34319566]

MeSH Term

Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies
Humanities
Italy
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Male
Female
Students, Medical
Curriculum
Motivation
Young Adult
Adult
Schools, Medical
Career Choice

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0medicalhumanitiescoursestudentstakeMedicalchosestudyacademicperformancevariableslowerp < 0schoolscourseselectiveItaliansociodemographicstudentcross-sectionalHumanitiesagegradeaveragepsychometricscoreseducationalanxietygroupschoiceUniversityBACKGROUND:cancontributepositivelyclinicalpracticeeducationThereforemanycountriesprogressivelyincorporatingcurriculumItalyoffervarietyofteninducesyetexploredaimfillgapinvestigatingwhetherpsychologicalmayinfluencemotivationMETHODS:conductedschoolcollecteddata2603rd6thyeardegreecomparedanalysingnumericpointcategoricalgendernationalitylevellivingconditionsMotivationsinvestigatedopen-endedquestionscategorizedprioranalysesRESULTS:twosubgroupsshowedsignificantdifferencescharacteristicsexcept001Amongscoredifferedsignificantly05Regardingnumberexaminationspassedsimilartaking01Interestpotentialmainreasonschoosing762%Concurrentcommitmentslacktimemajorobstacles39%CONCLUSIONS:AgelevelsseeminverselyassociatedConsideringworkloadduecurricularactivitiesplanningincreaseparticipationundergraduatechoosehumanities?EducationMotivationNarrativeMedicineReflectivePracticeCurriculumVisualThinkingStrategies

Similar Articles

Cited By