The dual roles of empathy in mediating structural empowerment and compassion fatigue among Chinese nurses.

Xiaoling Shen, He Bu, Jinhuan Zhang, Wenjie Duan, Haiyan Wang, Yan Tao, Zijia Qiao
Author Information
  1. Xiaoling Shen: Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai, PR China.
  2. He Bu: School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, PR China. buhe@ecust.edu.cn.
  3. Jinhuan Zhang: Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai, PR China.
  4. Wenjie Duan: School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, PR China.
  5. Haiyan Wang: Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai, PR China.
  6. Yan Tao: Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai, PR China.
  7. Zijia Qiao: Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai, PR China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurses in dynamic healthcare environments face escalating challenges that impact their efficacy and well-being. These challenges arise from both the increasing complexity of medical procedures and the intense emotional demands of caregiving, often leading to compassion fatigue. A global prevalence of burnout at 30.0% was observed over the past decade. This study examines the relationship between structural empowerment, empathy (cognitive and affective), and compassion fatigue among Chinese nurses. Understanding these relationships is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate compassion fatigue. It also contributes to enhancing nurses' well-being.
METHODS: Conducted at a public hospital in Shanghai, this cross-sectional study surveyed 305 nurses, with 277 valid responses. Structural empowerment was measured using the Conditions for Work Effectiveness Questionnaire-II, empathy with the Kiersma-Chen Empathy Scale, and compassion fatigue with the Compassion Fatigue Short Scale. We performed correlation and mediation analyses to explore the direct and indirect effects of structural empowerment on compassion fatigue through empathy.
RESULTS: A significant negative direct effect of structural empowerment on compassion fatigue was evidenced by a coefficient of -0.165 (confidence interval: [-0.311, -0.013]). Further analysis revealed a negative indirect effect through cognitive empathy, indicated by an effect of -0.103 (confidence interval: [-0.220, -0.008]). Increased structural empowerment was linked to higher levels of cognitive empathy, which correlated with decreased compassion fatigue. Conversely, the mediation through affective empathy showed a positive indirect effect, indicated by an effect of 0.126 (confidence interval: [0.047, 0.229]). This suggests that higher structural empowerment was associated with increased affective empathy, leading to higher levels of compassion fatigue.
CONCLUSION: The study illuminates the dual role of empathy within the framework of structural empowerment and its impact on compassion fatigue. Cognitive empathy serves as a protective factor, reducing susceptibility to compassion fatigue, while affective empathy appears to heighten vulnerability. These findings provide direct evidence supporting the dual processing pathways of empathy. It is recommended that healthcare policies integrate organizational support with targeted empathy training, such as cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation, and peer support, to effectively counteract compassion fatigue among nurses. However, due to the cross-sectional nature and the single-hospital setting, the findings should be interpreted cautiously.

Keywords

References

  1. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105456 [PMID: 35777296]
  2. Contemp Nurse. 2016 Aug;52(4):447-453 [PMID: 27575493]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 15;17(4): [PMID: 32075252]
  4. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Feb;66(643):e143-5 [PMID: 26823264]
  5. BMC Nurs. 2023 Nov 13;22(1):425 [PMID: 37957600]
  6. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 13;9:2212 [PMID: 30483202]
  7. J Adv Nurs. 1998 Dec;28(6):1289-94 [PMID: 9888374]
  8. Nurs Inq. 2010 Mar;17(1):65-74 [PMID: 20137032]
  9. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;28(3):335-343 [PMID: 32657511]
  10. Nurs Adm Q. 2017 Oct/Dec;41(4):337-345 [PMID: 28859002]
  11. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Aug;120:103973 [PMID: 34102372]
  12. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 30;6(6):e011279 [PMID: 27363817]
  13. Nurs Ethics. 2020 Mar;27(2):494-504 [PMID: 31284826]
  14. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11086 [PMID: 29952947]
  15. J Clin Psychol. 2002 Nov;58(11):1433-41 [PMID: 12412153]
  16. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Mar;47(2):186-94 [PMID: 25644276]
  17. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2023 Jul-Aug;29(4):314-327 [PMID: 34293934]
  18. Am Psychol. 1989 Mar;44(3):513-24 [PMID: 2648906]
  19. Int J Med Educ. 2015 Sep 05;6:103-8 [PMID: 26342190]
  20. J Nurs Manag. 2017 Apr;25(3):194-206 [PMID: 28078745]
  21. Nurs Ethics. 2020 May;27(3):639-665 [PMID: 31829113]
  22. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):755 [PMID: 29162095]
  23. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jan;76(1):103-8 [PMID: 16569133]
  24. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Sep;32(17-18):5836-5854 [PMID: 37194138]
  25. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Apr;76(4):939-962 [PMID: 31820471]
  26. Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;34(11):1206-1219 [PMID: 37737148]
  27. Int Nurs Rev. 2019 Sep;66(3):366-373 [PMID: 31016716]
  28. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Oct;24(19-20):2849-58 [PMID: 26178187]
  29. J Nurs Adm. 2020 Dec;50(12):635-641 [PMID: 33181600]
  30. J Adv Nurs. 2015 Sep;71(9):2041-50 [PMID: 25981240]
  31. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Apr;8(4):446-54 [PMID: 22355182]
  32. Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 13;11:1269594 [PMID: 38026273]
  33. J Nurs Educ. 2019 Dec 1;58(12):681-689 [PMID: 31794034]
  34. Nurse Educ Today. 1988 Jun;8(3):123-30 [PMID: 3419399]
  35. Behav Brain Sci. 2002 Feb;25(1):1-20; discussion 20-71 [PMID: 12625087]
  36. Nurs Health Sci. 2018 Mar;20(1):4-15 [PMID: 29152894]
  37. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Jul;40 Suppl 1:S4-S7 [PMID: 32502062]
  38. Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):776-790 [PMID: 33283617]
  39. J Psychol. 2018;152(8):630-645 [PMID: 30321113]
  40. Nurs Health Sci. 2009 Mar;11(1):90-7 [PMID: 19298314]
  41. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020 Nov 06;28:e3373 [PMID: 33174992]
  42. J Pers Assess. 2011 Jan;93(1):84-95 [PMID: 21184334]
  43. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 26;18(7): [PMID: 33810490]
  44. BMJ. 2012 Mar 20;344:e1717 [PMID: 22434089]
  45. Psychooncology. 2019 Dec;28(12):2344-2350 [PMID: 31518033]
  46. J Nurs Care Qual. 2008 Oct-Dec;23(4):322-30 [PMID: 18431259]
  47. BMC Nurs. 2023 Dec 18;22(1):482 [PMID: 38110907]
  48. Palliat Support Care. 2016 Aug;14(4):393-401 [PMID: 26466981]
  49. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016 Dec;22(12):599-606 [PMID: 27992278]
  50. Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Mar;55:100961 [PMID: 33434857]
  51. Affect Sci. 2022;3(1):118-134 [PMID: 35465047]
  52. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Jun 12;77(5):94 [PMID: 23788805]
  53. J Nurs Adm. 2014 Jan;44(1):10-6 [PMID: 24316613]
  54. Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Jun;86(5):8685 [PMID: 34507957]
  55. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Oct;19(5):352-358 [PMID: 35934812]
  56. J Nurs Manag. 2014 Oct;22(7):855-71 [PMID: 25298049]
  57. Nurs Forum. 2018 Oct;53(4):466-480 [PMID: 29962010]

Grants

  1. PWRq2021-23/Shanghai Pudong New Area Health Commission Outstanding Young Medical Talent Training Project
  2. 23PJC021/Shanghai Pujiang Programme
  3. 23ZR1415000/2023 Shanghai Natural Science Foundation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0empathyfatiguecompassionempowermentstructuraleffectcognitiveaffectivenurses-0studyamongdirectindirectconfidenceinterval:higherdualhealthcarechallengesimpactwell-beingleadingChinesecross-sectionalStructuralScaleCompassionmediationnegative[-0indicatedlevels0CognitivefindingssupportBACKGROUND:Nursesdynamicenvironmentsfaceescalatingefficacyariseincreasingcomplexitymedicalproceduresintenseemotionaldemandscaregivingoftenglobalprevalenceburnout300%observedpastdecadeexaminesrelationshipUnderstandingrelationshipscrucialdevelopingstrategiesmitigatealsocontributesenhancingnurses'METHODS:ConductedpublichospitalShanghaisurveyed305277validresponsesmeasuredusingConditionsWorkEffectivenessQuestionnaire-IIKiersma-ChenEmpathyFatigueShortperformedcorrelationanalysesexploreeffectsRESULTS:significantevidencedcoefficient165311013]analysisrevealed103220008]IncreasedlinkedcorrelateddecreasedConverselyshowedpositive126[0047229]suggestsassociatedincreasedCONCLUSION:illuminatesrolewithinframeworkservesprotectivefactorreducingsusceptibilityappearsheightenvulnerabilityprovideevidencesupportingprocessingpathwaysrecommendedpoliciesintegrateorganizationaltargetedtrainingreappraisalemotionregulationpeereffectivelycounteractHoweverduenaturesingle-hospitalsettinginterpretedcautiouslyrolesmediatingAffectiveHealthcareworkers

Similar Articles

Cited By