Evaluating a German learning disorders platform using the RE-AIM framework.

Lior Weinreich, Gido Metz, Bj��rn Witzel, Olga Hermansson, Paula D��mig, Gerd Schulte-K��rne, Kristina Moll
Author Information
  1. Lior Weinreich: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 5, 80336, Munich, Germany.
  2. Gido Metz: Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  3. Bj��rn Witzel: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 5, 80336, Munich, Germany.
  4. Olga Hermansson: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 5, 80336, Munich, Germany.
  5. Paula D��mig: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 5, 80336, Munich, Germany.
  6. Gerd Schulte-K��rne: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 5, 80336, Munich, Germany.
  7. Kristina Moll: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 5, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

In recent years, online platforms have made educational, medical, and other professional content easily accessible, but research evaluating such platforms is still scarce. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate LONDI, a German learning disorders platform. The platform offers scientifically based information for different user groups, and an algorithm-based help system that professionals can use to facilitate diagnosing and planning interventions. The evaluation is focused on the user group of learning therapists using the platform and its help system. It is theoretically grounded on the RE-AIM framework and assesses four of its dimensions: Reach, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. Results from an online questionnaire ( = 496) showed that the platform reaches a large proportion of learning therapists. Another online questionnaire ( = 150) revealed that most users say they would adopt the help system, and this is predicted by its pragmatic qualities. Data from the Matomo web analytics software ( = 8,459 online visits) displayed diverse patterns in the platform's implementation. Future research is needed to further examine their meaning in the context of health-related education. Web analytics also revealed that usage patterns are not maintained. Rather, there is an increase in the number of users and in smartphone usage over time, coinciding with a decrease in the average time spent on the platform. Consequently, future efforts will be dedicated to optimizing smartphone compatibility. This study is the first to utilize the RE-AIM framework with web analytics, paving the way for further theory-grounded platform evaluations.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 21;23(1):116 [PMID: 36810014]
  2. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;51(12):1227-1239 [PMID: 27733709]
  3. JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Jul 21;9:e47777 [PMID: 37477962]
  4. Transl Behav Med. 2017 Mar;7(1):106-114 [PMID: 27256575]
  5. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Jun;63(6):721-728 [PMID: 32367206]
  6. J Comput High Educ. 2023;35(1):126-143 [PMID: 35637707]
  7. Ann Dyslexia. 1986 Jan;36(1):67-81 [PMID: 24243452]
  8. BMC Public Health. 2011 Sep 20;11:709 [PMID: 21933429]
  9. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):833-842 [PMID: 27745683]
  10. Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:64 [PMID: 30984733]
  11. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Feb;17(2):422-30 [PMID: 23218458]
  12. Health Promot Int. 2013 Mar;28(1):36-42 [PMID: 22377974]
  13. J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 23;26:e56930 [PMID: 39042446]
  14. Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 14;12(1):36 [PMID: 28292299]
  15. Nurs Health Sci. 2015 Sep;17(3):362-9 [PMID: 25818472]
  16. Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jul;9(3):693-703 [PMID: 30184559]
  17. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;19(2):327-34 [PMID: 22332821]
  18. Heliyon. 2022 Apr 09;8(4):e09246 [PMID: 35497031]
  19. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7 [PMID: 10474547]
  20. J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Dec;39(12):1303-1312 [PMID: 31690170]
  21. Heliyon. 2023 Nov 04;9(11):e22070 [PMID: 38034679]
  22. J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023 Sep 29;2:11803 [PMID: 38312406]
  23. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 28;22(4):e15573 [PMID: 32343248]
  24. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):354 [PMID: 34162382]
  25. Heliyon. 2022 Sep 23;8(9):e10735 [PMID: 36177224]
  26. Health Promot Int. 2023 Aug 1;38(4): [PMID: 37596929]
  27. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 27;9:101 [PMID: 29636707]
  28. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Mar;122:108242 [PMID: 33509419]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0platformonlinelearninganalyticsdisordershelpsystemRE-AIMframeworkplatformsresearchstudyGermanuserevaluationtherapistsusingquestionnairerevealedusersMatomowebpatternsusagesmartphonetimerecentyearsmadeeducationalmedicalprofessionalcontenteasilyaccessibleevaluatingstillscarcepurposecurrentevaluateLONDIoffersscientificallybasedinformationdifferentgroupsalgorithm-basedprofessionalscanusefacilitatediagnosingplanninginterventionsfocusedgrouptheoreticallygroundedassessesfourdimensions:ReachAdoptionImplementationMaintenanceResults = 496showedreacheslargeproportionAnother = 150sayadoptpredictedpragmaticqualitiesDatasoftware = 8459visitsdisplayeddiverseplatform'simplementationFutureneededexaminemeaningcontexthealth-relatededucationWebalsomaintainedRatherincreasenumbercoincidingdecreaseaveragespentConsequentlyfutureeffortswilldedicatedoptimizingcompatibilityfirstutilizepavingwaytheory-groundedevaluationsEvaluatingLearningOnlineUserexperience

Similar Articles

Cited By