Trust in the science behind COVID-19 vaccines as a driver of vaccine acceptance in the United States, 2021-2023.

Trenton M White, Katarzyna Wyka, Kenneth Rabin, Ayman El-Mohandes
Author Information
  1. Trenton M White: Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York City, United States.
  2. Katarzyna Wyka: Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York City, United States.
  3. Kenneth Rabin: Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York City, United States.
  4. Ayman El-Mohandes: Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York City, United States.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate changes in public trust in the science behind COVID-19 vaccines in the United States (US) from 2021 to 2023, and to assess how loss of a family member or close friend to COVID-19, influences this trust and vaccine acceptance.
Methods: Using stratified random sampling for key demographic variables, including age, gender, race/ethnicity, region, and education level, the study analyzes data from a series of cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2021, 2022 and 2023. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents and their levels of trust in science and vaccine acceptance. Weighted logistic regression models were applied to assess the relationships between trust in science, vaccine acceptance, and socio-demographic factors. These models controlled for potential confounding variables and allowed for the estimation of adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), highlighting the key predictors of vaccine acceptance and willingness to receive future recommended boosters.
Results: The results indicate that trust in science remained relatively stable over the study period and continued to be a strong predictor of vaccine acceptance, which was higher among male respondents, those with university degrees, and those with higher than median income. Notably, the experience of personal loss was significantly related to an individual's trust in science and vaccine acceptance.
Conclusions: Trust in the science behind COVID-19 vaccines appears to have been a crucial factor in US vaccine acceptance, with respondents who expressed higher trust being significantly more likely to accept the vaccine and express willingness to take future boosters. To maintain and enhance public trust in vaccination programs, trust in health communication from public sources, particularly the CDC, must be strengthened, as trust in the CDC was also found to be significantly correlated with both vaccine acceptance and future booster uptake. Personal experiences of loss due to COVID-19 were important predictors of trust in science and vaccine acceptance, highlighting the need for public health communications to be sensitive to the emotional impact of loss and grief along with the diverse socio-economic and educational backgrounds of the US population.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 2021 Oct 16;398(10309):1407-1416 [PMID: 34619098]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 07;18(18): [PMID: 34574373]
  3. J Behav Med. 2023 Apr;46(1-2):129-139 [PMID: 36652085]
  4. Vaccine. 2023 Mar 17;41(12):1911-1915 [PMID: 36682984]
  5. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1412-1423 [PMID: 33626250]
  6. J Health Commun. 2024 Jan 2;29(1):61-71 [PMID: 37962284]
  7. Nat Med. 2024 Jun;30(6):1559-1563 [PMID: 38684861]
  8. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):179-187 [PMID: 34671900]
  9. Nat Med. 2023 Feb;29(2):366-375 [PMID: 36624316]
  10. Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 1;13(1):3801 [PMID: 35778396]
  11. Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 4;11(1):21844 [PMID: 34737319]
  12. Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225-228 [PMID: 33082575]
  13. Public Underst Sci. 2021 Aug;30(6):644-670 [PMID: 34006153]
  14. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0248328 [PMID: 33760856]
  15. Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Apr 20;11(4): [PMID: 33924118]
  16. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022 Mar;18(3):135-136 [PMID: 34997231]
  17. F1000Res. 2022 Aug 4;11:891 [PMID: 35967974]
  18. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 10;23(9):e30854 [PMID: 34346888]
  19. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 13;7(10): [PMID: 36288039]
  20. Vaccine. 2023 Mar 3;41(10):1703-1715 [PMID: 36754765]
  21. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 04;18(17): [PMID: 34501932]
  22. Nature. 2024 Feb;626(8000):704 [PMID: 38356001]
  23. Transl Behav Med. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):243-272 [PMID: 34850217]
  24. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2043102 [PMID: 35417302]
  25. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Sep;179:110892 [PMID: 34866723]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trustvaccineacceptancescienceCOVID-19publiclossbehindvaccinesUSrespondentsfuturehighersignificantlyTrustUnitedStates20212023assesskeyvariablesstudysocio-demographicmodelshighlightingpredictorswillingnessboostershealthCDCObjectives:evaluatechangesfamilymemberclosefriendinfluencesMethods:Usingstratifiedrandomsamplingdemographicincludingagegenderrace/ethnicityregioneducationlevelanalyzesdataseriescross-sectionalsurveysconducted2022DescriptivestatisticsemployedsummarizecharacteristicslevelsWeightedlogisticregressionappliedrelationshipsfactorscontrolledpotentialconfoundingallowedestimationadjustedoddsratiosaOR95%confidenceintervalsCIreceiverecommendedResults:resultsindicateremainedrelativelystableperiodcontinuedstrongpredictoramongmaleuniversitydegreesmedianincomeNotablyexperiencepersonalrelatedindividual'sConclusions:appearscrucialfactorexpressedlikelyacceptexpresstakemaintainenhancevaccinationprogramscommunicationsourcesparticularlymuststrengthenedalsofoundcorrelatedboosteruptakePersonalexperiencesdueimportantneedcommunicationssensitiveemotionalimpactgriefalongdiversesocio-economiceducationalbackgroundspopulationdriver2021-2023PandemicSurveyVaccine

Similar Articles

Cited By