Characteristics of hospital pediatricians and obstetricians/gynecologists working long hours in Tokushima, Japan: A cross-sectional study.

Mai Nakagawa, Kazumi Nakagawa, Koga Nakai, Ayumu Tominaga, Yoshiro Mori, Takeshi Iwasa, Maki Urushihara, Ichiro Hashimoto, Hisayoshi Morioka
Author Information
  1. Mai Nakagawa: Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima city, Tokushima, Japan.
  2. Kazumi Nakagawa: Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima city, Tokushima, Japan.
  3. Koga Nakai: Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima city, Tokushima, Japan.
  4. Ayumu Tominaga: Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima city, Tokushima, Japan.
  5. Yoshiro Mori: Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima city, Tokushima, Japan.
  6. Takeshi Iwasa: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima city, Tokushima, Japan.
  7. Maki Urushihara: Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima city, Tokushima, Japan.
  8. Ichiro Hashimoto: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima city, Tokushima, Japan.
  9. Hisayoshi Morioka: Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima city, Tokushima, Japan. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the actual working conditions, including working hours and desired future working styles of hospital pediatricians and obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) in Tokushima Prefecture.
METHOD: This cross-sectional study used a self-administered questionnaire. Pediatricians and OB/GYNs (n = 96) working at 14 hospitals in Tokushima Prefecture were surveyed. The questionnaire included items related to working hours, working status, number of medical institutions, task-shifting/task-sharing status, and preferred work style. Factors associated with work hours were analyzed.
RESULTS: Approximately 40% and 10% of pediatricians and OB/GYNs worked ���60 h/week and ���80 h/week, respectively. Their weekly working hours were significantly positively associated with the number of nights and holidays worked and concurrent medical facilities they worked at. Multiple regression models showed that weekly working hours were significantly associated with working at night and day-off duties and the number of working medical institutions being worked at concurrently. Pediatricians and OB/GYNs who worked ���60 h/week were not implementing a "multiple attending physician system" or "on-call system," and task-shifting/task-sharing was inadequate. A significantly higher proportion of physicians who worked long hours (���60 h/week or ���80 h/week) wanted to reduce the number of night and day-off duties and work hours compared with those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that many pediatricians and OB/GYNs work long hours, and it is essential to improve their work environment, including task-shifting/task-sharing. Further enhanced recruitment and retention of hospital pediatricians and OB/GYNs is required. A detailed and large-scale study of pediatricians and OB/GYNs' working environments is essential in the future.

References

  1. Int J Med Sci. 2013 Aug 28;10(11):1471-8 [PMID: 24046520]
  2. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 18;9(11):e032779 [PMID: 31740474]
  3. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jan 14;101(2):e28467 [PMID: 35029191]
  4. BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Oct 24;16(1):72 [PMID: 26498823]
  5. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 23;6(11):e013947 [PMID: 27881531]
  6. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0245385 [PMID: 33434232]
  7. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 Sep 1;46(5):480-487 [PMID: 32096547]
  8. Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):93 [PMID: 31305255]
  9. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30167 [PMID: 36107615]
  10. Pediatr Int. 2009 Oct;51(5):645-9 [PMID: 19419521]
  11. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jul;286:112-117 [PMID: 37243999]
  12. J Occup Health. 2022 Jan;64(1):e12377 [PMID: 36459419]
  13. Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Mar;65(2):117-21 [PMID: 25324485]
  14. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):943 [PMID: 35869512]
  15. Hum Resour Health. 2018 Oct 22;16(1):56 [PMID: 30348164]
  16. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009 Apr;217(4):299-305 [PMID: 19346735]
  17. Occup Med (Lond). 2022 Apr 19;72(3):200-206 [PMID: 35064662]
  18. Lancet. 2015 Oct 31;386(10005):1739-46 [PMID: 26298822]
  19. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2016 Mar-Apr;6(2):74-9 [PMID: 27213088]
  20. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):729 [PMID: 36266644]
  21. Pediatrics. 2021 Apr;147(4): [PMID: 33361360]
  22. BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 12;24(1):164 [PMID: 38216962]
  23. PLoS Med. 2006 Dec;3(12):e487 [PMID: 17194188]
  24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1444-9 [PMID: 17074551]
  25. J Med Invest. 2022;69(3.4):159-164 [PMID: 36244764]
  26. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Sep 06;11:100212 [PMID: 34917998]
  27. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Apr 6;77(13):1616-1625 [PMID: 33795035]
  28. J Occup Health. 2021 Jan;63(1):e12228 [PMID: 33957007]
  29. JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150 [PMID: 30326495]
  30. Hum Resour Health. 2023 Oct 26;21(1):85 [PMID: 37885012]
  31. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 23;12(1):10626 [PMID: 35739229]
  32. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 15;14(7):e0219657 [PMID: 31306462]
  33. J Surg Res. 2023 Oct;290:293-303 [PMID: 37327639]
  34. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2114386 [PMID: 34160608]
  35. BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):2317 [PMID: 37996804]
  36. BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 27;5(3):e005845 [PMID: 25818268]
  37. Hum Resour Health. 2013 Nov 22;11:59 [PMID: 24267031]
  38. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;190(3):851-7 [PMID: 15042024]
  39. Pediatr Int. 2022 Jan;64(1):e15173 [PMID: 35727869]
  40. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 8;172(18):1377-85 [PMID: 22911330]
  41. BMC Pediatr. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):427 [PMID: 32894080]
  42. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Aug;35(4):761-6 [PMID: 19751339]

MeSH Term

Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies
Japan
Female
Male
Obstetrics
Adult
Surveys and Questionnaires
Gynecology
Pediatricians
Middle Aged
Workload
Work Schedule Tolerance
Hospitals
Obstetricians
Gynecologists

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0workinghourspediatriciansOB/GYNsworkedstudyworkh/weeknumberhospitalTokushimamedicaltask-shifting/task-sharingassociated���60significantlylongincludingfutureobstetricians/gynecologistsPrefecturecross-sectionalquestionnairePediatriciansstatusinstitutions���80weeklynightday-offdutiesessentialBACKGROUND:aimeddetermineactualconditionsdesiredstylesMETHOD:usedself-administeredn=9614hospitalssurveyedincludeditemsrelatedpreferredstyleFactorsanalyzedRESULTS:Approximately40%10%respectivelypositivelynightsholidaysconcurrentfacilitiesMultipleregressionmodelsshowedconcurrentlyimplementing"multipleattendingphysiciansystem""on-callsystem"inadequatehigherproportionphysicianswantedreducecomparednotCONCLUSIONS:resultssuggestmanyimproveenvironmentenhancedrecruitmentretentionrequireddetailedlarge-scaleOB/GYNs'environmentsCharacteristicsJapan:

Similar Articles

Cited By