Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producer Gram-Negative Rods and Associated Factors Among Patients With Wound Infection at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

Sara Tesfaye, Wudu Tafere, Wondwossen Abebe, Yitayih Wondimeneh
Author Information
  1. Sara Tesfaye: Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jigjiga University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia. ORCID
  2. Wudu Tafere: Department of Medical Microbiology, Amhara National Regional State Public Health Institute, Bahirdar, Ethiopia.
  3. Wondwossen Abebe: Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. ORCID
  4. Yitayih Wondimeneh: Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Abstract

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria have significantly affected the management and treatment of wound infections globally. Data on the prevalence of MDR bacterial profiles that cause wound infections in Ethiopia are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to determine MDR as well as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production profiles of Gram-negative rods that are difficult to treat with conventional antibiotics and that cause wound infections. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producer Gram-negative rods and associated factors among patients with wound infection at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, northwest Ethiopia. This hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital between May and July 2022. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 228 participants. Swabs from different wound types were inoculated onto the MacConkey agar and blood agar plates and incubated overnight at 37°C for 24 h. Biochemical tests were performed on isolated colonies for the identification of bacterial species based on their biochemical reaction. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using the disk diffusion technique as per the standard Kirby-Bauer method by using Muller-Hinton agar, and the zone of inhibition was interpreted as resistant, intermediate, and sensitive as per the recommendation of Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute. Isolates were tested against ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and ceftazidime for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase screening using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, and combined disk tests were applied for phenotypic confirmatory test of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing isolates. Of 228 study participants, 162 (71.1%) were culture-positive. Among culture-positive patients, 165 Gram-negative bacteria were recovered. The most common Gram-negative isolates were (47; 28.5%), followed by (43; 26.1%) and (24; 14.5%). The susceptibility rates of the isolate for imipenem and tobramycin were 97.0% and 73.2%, respectively, and the overall multidrug resistance rate was 80.5%. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producer bacteria were also isolated. Besides, all (100%) of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producer bacteria were MDR. Living in rural areas (AOR 5.8; 95% CI [2.01-16.7]), hospital admission (AOR 3.95; 95% CI [1.13-13.83]), antibiotic use (AOR 2.83; 95% CI [1.03-7.72]), and comorbidity (AOR 0.25; 95% CI [0.07-0.59]) were significantly associated with wound infection. There was a high prevalence of Gram-negative bacterial isolates in this study (28.5%) was the predominant isolate. In addition, high rates of multidrug resistance were observed. The high level of multidrug resistance in this study implies that definitive therapy should be based on culture and susceptibility analysis to promote the rational use of antibiotics and to reduce the emergence of bacterial resistance to antimicrobials.

Keywords

References

  1. Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Nov 05;14:4629-4639 [PMID: 34764659]
  2. Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Sep;6(9):668 [PMID: 29937248]
  3. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Oct 8;7:121 [PMID: 30338059]
  4. J Chemother. 2001 Nov;13 Spec No 1(1):6-11 [PMID: 11936382]
  5. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Dec 16;114(12):962-973 [PMID: 33247921]
  6. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021 May 10;20(1):33 [PMID: 33971896]
  7. Int J Microbiol. 2021 Oct 27;2021:9933926 [PMID: 34745266]
  8. Heliyon. 2019 Dec 13;5(12):e02956 [PMID: 31886427]
  9. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Apr 16;6:74 [PMID: 31041313]
  10. Afr J Lab Med. 2018 Dec 06;7(2):830 [PMID: 30568906]
  11. Ann Afr Med. 2018 Jul-Sep;17(3):110-116 [PMID: 30185679]
  12. Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Aug 10;14:3053-3062 [PMID: 34408449]
  13. J Glob Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;3(3):211-5 [PMID: 21887050]
  14. Am J Infect Control. 2018 Apr;46(4):387-392 [PMID: 29217187]
  15. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Mar;18(3):268-81 [PMID: 21793988]
  16. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Oct;19(7):684-690 [PMID: 30124378]
  17. Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Aug 11;15:4435-4441 [PMID: 35978723]
  18. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Mar 9;7:37 [PMID: 29541448]
  19. Saudi Med J. 2005 Aug;26(8):1305-7 [PMID: 16127538]
  20. J Wound Care. 2017 Jan 2;26(1):20-25 [PMID: 28103163]
  21. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018 Sep;14:85-89 [PMID: 29438821]
  22. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020 Mar 31;14(3):277-283 [PMID: 32235088]
  23. Clin Lab. 2020 Jul 1;66(7): [PMID: 32658423]
  24. BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Jul 28;6:125 [PMID: 16875502]
  25. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013 Jul 23;12:17 [PMID: 23879886]
  26. Int J Microbiol. 2017;2017:8953829 [PMID: 28386280]
  27. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Sep;26:133-139 [PMID: 34129993]
  28. Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;48(7):939-945 [PMID: 32282351]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0woundstudybeta-lactamaseGram-negativeextended-spectrumMDRbacteriabacterial5%resistanceAOR95%CIinfectionsprevalenceEthiopiarodsproducerinfectionUniversityGondarComprehensiveSpecializedHospitalagartestssusceptibilityusingdiskisolatesmultidrughighsignificantlyprofilescausedetermineantibioticsassociatedpatients228participantsperformedisolatedbaseddiffusionperKirby-Bauermethod1%culture-positiveAmong28ratesisolate[1useMultidrug-resistantaffectedmanagementtreatmentgloballyDatascarceThereforeaimedwellproductiondifficulttreatconventionalaimfactorsamongnorthwesthospital-basedcross-sectionalconductedMayJuly2022ConveniencesamplingusedrecruitSwabsdifferenttypesinoculatedontoMacConkeybloodplatesincubatedovernight37°C24 hBiochemicalcoloniesidentificationspeciesbiochemicalreactionAntimicrobialtechniquestandardMuller-HintonzoneinhibitioninterpretedresistantintermediatesensitiverecommendationClinicalLaboratoryStandardInstituteIsolatestestedceftriaxonecefotaximeceftazidimescreeningcombinedappliedphenotypicconfirmatorytestproducing16271165recoveredcommon47followed43262414imipenemtobramycin970%732%respectivelyoverallrate80Extended-spectrumalsoBesides100%Livingruralareas58[201-167]hospitaladmission39513-1383]antibiotic28303-772]comorbidity025[007-059]predominantadditionobservedlevelimpliesdefinitivetherapycultureanalysispromoterationalreduceemergenceantimicrobialsPrevalenceExtended-SpectrumBeta-LactamaseProducerGram-NegativeRodsAssociatedFactorsPatientsWoundInfectionNorthwestESBLUOGCSH

Similar Articles

Cited By