Personality functioning in bipolar 1 disorder and borderline personality disorder.

Karin Feichtinger, Clarissa Laczkovics, Johanna Alexopoulos, Maria Gruber, Miriam Klauser, Karoline Parth, Antonia Wininger, Michael Ossege, Josef Baumgartner, Stephan Doering, Victor Blüml
Author Information
  1. Karin Feichtinger: Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  2. Clarissa Laczkovics: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  3. Johanna Alexopoulos: Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  4. Maria Gruber: Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  5. Miriam Klauser: Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  6. Karoline Parth: Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  7. Antonia Wininger: Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  8. Michael Ossege: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  9. Josef Baumgartner: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  10. Stephan Doering: Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
  11. Victor Blüml: Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. victor.blueml@meduniwien.ac.at.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differentiation of borderline personality disorder (BPD) and bipolar I disorder (BD) has been challenging. The assessment of shared symptoms in the context of the overall personality functioning, the patient's sense of self, and the quality of his object (interpersonal) relations is proposed to be valuable for the differential diagnosis of these disorders.
METHODS: We empirically investigated the level of personality organization (PO), identity integration, and quality of object relations in patients suffering from BD or BPD using the Structured Interview of personality Organization (STIPO) and the Level of personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) in 34 BPD and 28 BD patients as well as 27 healthy control persons. Group comparisons and a logistic regression model were calculated to analyze group differences.
RESULTS: The BPD group showed significantly greater impairment in several domains of personality functioning, namely "identity", and "self- and other-directed aggression", while showing lower impairment in "moral values". The overall level of PO in the BPD group was significantly lower when excluding not only BPD but any personality disorder (PD) in the BD sample. Severity of impaired personality structure had a major impact on symptom load independent of the main diagnosis BD or BPD.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show greater impairment in personality functioning in BPD than in BD patients. BD patients present with varying levels of PO, whereas in BPD severe deficits in PO are pathognomonic. The level of PO has a significant impact on symptom severity in both BD and BPD patients. Therefore, careful assessment of PO should be considered for differential diagnosis and adequate treatment planning.

Keywords

References

  1. Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2010;56(2):136-49 [PMID: 20623459]
  2. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Dec;194(12):967-70 [PMID: 17164638]
  3. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2018 Aug 11;6(1):18 [PMID: 30097737]
  4. Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;132(1):1-25 [PMID: 16435954]
  5. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Nov 20;21(12):125 [PMID: 31749106]
  6. Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;30(8):965-74 [PMID: 26647873]
  7. J Pers Disord. 2019 Aug;33(4):533-543 [PMID: 30036171]
  8. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 3;17(1):159 [PMID: 28468681]
  9. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Jan 18;22(2):6 [PMID: 31955273]
  10. J Pers Assess. 2011 Jul;93(4):332-46 [PMID: 22804672]
  11. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;166(12):1355-64 [PMID: 19833787]
  12. Depress Anxiety. 2021 Jun;38(6):671-681 [PMID: 33503287]
  13. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 09;12:681876 [PMID: 34177664]
  14. Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1672-82 [PMID: 23663953]
  15. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004 Dec;110(6):401-7 [PMID: 15521823]
  16. J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:856-860 [PMID: 30699870]
  17. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 16;12:654026 [PMID: 33935839]
  18. Am J Psychother. 2023 Mar 1;76(1):26-30 [PMID: 36052452]
  19. J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):204-213 [PMID: 31995393]
  20. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):757-66 [PMID: 16818865]
  21. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;46(4):327-39 [PMID: 22508593]
  22. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013;34(1):1-8 [PMID: 23524617]
  23. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;14(9):1257-88 [PMID: 21320390]
  24. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 May;196(5):389-95 [PMID: 20435966]
  25. Psychopathology. 2018;51(1):57-64 [PMID: 29393279]
  26. J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 1;302:401-411 [PMID: 35041870]
  27. BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 11;9(5):e150 [PMID: 37563768]
  28. J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 1;189:169-75 [PMID: 26437231]
  29. J Pers Assess. 2010 Jan;92(1):35-44 [PMID: 20013454]
  30. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 May;165(5):631-8 [PMID: 18347003]
  31. BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Aug 13;13:210 [PMID: 23941404]
  32. Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;60(7):303-8 [PMID: 26175388]
  33. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Feb;37:139-144 [PMID: 33548678]
  34. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Feb 20;57(2): [PMID: 33672619]
  35. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1990;38(4):1049-81 [PMID: 2286739]
  36. Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;10(5):856-868 [PMID: 36172259]
  37. Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;53(7):952-61 [PMID: 22560773]
  38. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1973 Jan;9(1):13-28 [PMID: 4682398]
  39. Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1879-90 [PMID: 22153017]
  40. Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):362-9 [PMID: 23588687]
  41. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Jan;29(1):26-61 [PMID: 33811707]
  42. Bipolar Disord. 2018 Feb;20(1):18-26 [PMID: 28833984]
  43. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;196(1):4-12 [PMID: 20044651]
  44. Bipolar Disord. 2003 Feb;5(1):14-21 [PMID: 12656933]
  45. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;48(12):1060-4 [PMID: 1845222]
  46. J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:897-907 [PMID: 34375218]
  47. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;170(1):111-20 [PMID: 23223866]
  48. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):14 [PMID: 28125960]
  49. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;63(6):649-58 [PMID: 16754838]
  50. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 28;12:690808 [PMID: 34393854]
  51. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;164(6):922-8 [PMID: 17541052]
  52. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014 Aug;130(2):99-108 [PMID: 24571137]
  53. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Jun 4;21(7):51 [PMID: 31161404]
  54. J Pers Assess. 2018 Nov-Dec;100(6):621-629 [PMID: 29617170]
  55. J Pers Disord. 2020 Mar 12;:1-15 [PMID: 32163025]
  56. Bull Menninger Clin. 2013 Winter;77(1):1-22 [PMID: 23428169]
  57. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;(8):CD005652 [PMID: 22895952]
  58. Psychol Med. 2009 Aug;39(8):1247-52 [PMID: 19335937]
  59. Pers Individ Dif. 2013 Jul 1;55(2):85-89 [PMID: 24031102]
  60. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Mar;133(3):187-95 [PMID: 26432099]
  61. Bipolar Disord. 2003 Apr;5(2):115-22 [PMID: 12680901]
  62. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Jun;150:214-218 [PMID: 35397334]
  63. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Jan;203(1):3-7 [PMID: 25536097]
  64. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1981 Apr;4(1):169-95 [PMID: 7232235]

MeSH Term

Humans
Borderline Personality Disorder
Bipolar Disorder
Male
Female
Adult
Middle Aged
Personality
Diagnosis, Differential
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BPDpersonalityBDdisorderPOfunctioningpatientsPersonalitydiagnosislevelgroupimpairmentborderlinebipolarassessmentoverallqualityobjectrelationsdifferentialSTIPOsignificantlygreaterlowerimpactsymptomBACKGROUND:Differentiationchallengingsharedsymptomscontextpatient'ssenseselfinterpersonalproposedvaluabledisordersMETHODS:empiricallyinvestigatedorganizationidentityintegrationsufferingusingStructuredInterviewOrganizationLevelFunctioningScaleLPFS3428well27healthycontrolpersonsGroupcomparisonslogisticregressionmodelcalculatedanalyzedifferencesRESULTS:showedseveraldomainsnamely"identity""self-other-directedaggression"showing"moralvalues"excludingPDsampleSeverityimpairedstructuremajorloadindependentmainCONCLUSIONS:datashowpresentvaryinglevelswhereasseveredeficitspathognomonicsignificantseverityThereforecarefulconsideredadequatetreatmentplanning1BipolarBorderlineIdentity

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)