Single Laboratory Evaluation of the Q20+ Nanopore Sequencing Kit for Bacterial Outbreak Investigations.

Maria Hoffmann, Jay Hee Jang, Sandra M Tallent, Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona
Author Information
  1. Maria Hoffmann: Genomics Development and Applications Branch, Division of Food Safety Genomics, Office of Applied Microbiology and Technology, Office of Laboratory Operations and Applied Science, Human Foods Program, Food & Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA.
  2. Jay Hee Jang: Genomics Development and Applications Branch, Division of Food Safety Genomics, Office of Applied Microbiology and Technology, Office of Laboratory Operations and Applied Science, Human Foods Program, Food & Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA.
  3. Sandra M Tallent: Genomics Development and Applications Branch, Division of Food Safety Genomics, Office of Applied Microbiology and Technology, Office of Laboratory Operations and Applied Science, Human Foods Program, Food & Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA.
  4. Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona: Genomics Development and Applications Branch, Division of Food Safety Genomics, Office of Applied Microbiology and Technology, Office of Laboratory Operations and Applied Science, Human Foods Program, Food & Drug Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Leafy greens are a significant source of produce-related Shiga toxin-producing (STEC) outbreaks in the United States, with agricultural water often implicated as a potential source. Current FDA outbreak detection protocols are time-consuming and rely on sequencing methods performed in costly equipment. This study evaluated the potential of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) with Q20+ chemistry as a cost-effective, rapid, and accurate method for identifying and clustering foodborne pathogens. The study focuses on assessing whether ONT Q20+ technology could facilitate near real-time pathogen identification, including SNP differences, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance genes. This pilot study evaluated different combinations of two DNA extraction methods (Maxwell RSC Cultured Cell DNA kit and Monarch high molecular weight extraction kits) and two ONT library preparation protocols (ligation and the rapid barcoding sequencing kit) using five well-characterized strains representing diverse foodborne pathogens. High-quality, closed bacterial genomes were obtained from all combinations of extraction and sequencing kits. However, variations in assembly length and genome completeness were observed, indicating the need for further optimization. In silico analyses demonstrated that Q20+ nanopore sequencing chemistry accurately identified species, genotype, and virulence factors, with comparable results to Illumina sequencing. Phylogenomic clustering showed that ONT assemblies clustered with reference genomes, though some indels and SNP differences were observed, likely due to sequencing and analysis methodologies rather than inherent genetic variation. Additionally, the study evaluated the impact of a change in the sampling rates from 4 kHz (260 bases pair second) to 5 kHz (400 bases pair second), finding no significant difference in sequencing accuracy. This evaluation workflow offers a framework for evaluating novel technologies for use in surveillance and foodborne outbreak investigations. Overall, the evaluation demonstrated the potential of ONT Q20+ nanopore sequencing chemistry to assist in identifying the correct strain during outbreak investigations. However, further research, validation studies, and optimization efforts are needed to address the observed limitations and fully realize the technology's potential for improving public health outcomes and enabling more efficient responses to foodborne disease threats.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 1;14(4):e0214620 [PMID: 30934002]
  2. Nat Methods. 2022 Jul;19(7):823-826 [PMID: 35789207]
  3. Front Microbiol. 2016 Jun 30;7:985 [PMID: 27446025]
  4. Can J Microbiol. 2024 May 1;70(5):178-189 [PMID: 38354391]
  5. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 May;37(5):540-546 [PMID: 30936562]
  6. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 26;381(26):2569-2580 [PMID: 31881145]
  7. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Dec 1;75(12):3491-3500 [PMID: 32780112]
  8. J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Apr 26;57(5): [PMID: 30728194]
  9. Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e0050924 [PMID: 38809017]
  10. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0245172 [PMID: 33444384]
  11. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018 Feb;49:224-229 [PMID: 29169072]
  12. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 Mar 03;72(9):223-226 [PMID: 36862586]
  13. Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 28;20(1):257 [PMID: 31779668]
  14. Microb Genom. 2021 Mar;7(3): [PMID: 33683192]
  15. J Clin Microbiol. 2024 May 8;62(5):e0157623 [PMID: 38441926]
  16. Microb Genom. 2023 Jan;9(1): [PMID: 36748454]
  17. Front Microbiol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1139312 [PMID: 37143544]
  18. Front Microbiol. 2023 May 15;14:1179966 [PMID: 37256057]
  19. Genome Announc. 2013 Feb 28;1(2):e0013412 [PMID: 23516226]
  20. Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20 [PMID: 24695404]
  21. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Jan 3;79(1):55-60 [PMID: 37965757]
  22. F1000Res. 2019 Dec 23;8:2138 [PMID: 31984131]
  23. Front Microbiol. 2023 Aug 31;14:1221668 [PMID: 37720160]
  24. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jun 13;82(13):3900-3912 [PMID: 27107118]
  25. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0242294 [PMID: 33761524]
  26. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jun 8;13(6):e1005595 [PMID: 28594827]
  27. Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Jun;38(6):701-707 [PMID: 32042169]
  28. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 05;71(8):e323-e330 [PMID: 31814028]
  29. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Aug;53(8):2410-26 [PMID: 25972421]
  30. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5(11):2109-23 [PMID: 24158624]
  31. Microorganisms. 2021 Mar 14;9(3): [PMID: 33799479]
  32. PeerJ. 2021 Nov 25;9:e12446 [PMID: 34900416]
  33. J Mol Evol. 1983;19(2):153-70 [PMID: 6571220]
  34. BMC Genomics. 2021 Feb 10;22(1):114 [PMID: 33568057]
  35. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):937-944 [PMID: 31359005]
  36. Microb Genom. 2023 May;9(5): [PMID: 37133905]
  37. BMC Genomics. 2023 Aug 4;24(1):438 [PMID: 37537550]
  38. Front Microbiol. 2023 Sep 21;14:1254777 [PMID: 37808298]
  39. Microb Genom. 2022 Apr;8(4): [PMID: 35438621]
  40. Microb Genom. 2024 May;10(5): [PMID: 38713194]

Grants

  1. FDA Foods Program Intramural Funds/United States Food and Drug Administration
  2. FDA Foods Program Intramural Funds/United States Food and Drug Administration

MeSH Term

Nanopore Sequencing
Disease Outbreaks
Humans
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Genome, Bacterial
Foodborne Diseases
Phylogeny
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
DNA, Bacterial
Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli Infections
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Pilot Projects

Chemicals

DNA, Bacterial

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By