Effects of Toxic and Non-Toxic on the Defense System of -.

Yuanpu Sha, Shuwen Zhang, Jing Dong, Xiaofei Gao, Huatao Yuan, Jingxiao Zhang, Yunni Gao, Xuejun Li
Author Information
  1. Yuanpu Sha: College of Fisheries, Henan Normal University, Jianshe Road, Xinxiang 453007, China.
  2. Shuwen Zhang: College of Fisheries, Henan Normal University, Jianshe Road, Xinxiang 453007, China.
  3. Jing Dong: College of Fisheries, Henan Normal University, Jianshe Road, Xinxiang 453007, China.
  4. Xiaofei Gao: College of Fisheries, Henan Normal University, Jianshe Road, Xinxiang 453007, China.
  5. Huatao Yuan: College of Fisheries, Henan Normal University, Jianshe Road, Xinxiang 453007, China.
  6. Jingxiao Zhang: College of Fisheries, Henan Normal University, Jianshe Road, Xinxiang 453007, China.
  7. Yunni Gao: College of Fisheries, Henan Normal University, Jianshe Road, Xinxiang 453007, China. ORCID
  8. Xuejun Li: College of Fisheries, Henan Normal University, Jianshe Road, Xinxiang 453007, China.

Abstract

The effects of toxic and non-toxic on the - system were simulated in the laboratory, and some parameters in relation to these organisms were measured. In this experiment, increased the biomass of , and both toxic and non-toxic significantly inhibited the colony formation of and inhibited the promotion of biomass. On the 14th day, the soluble polysaccharide content of decreased when it was coexisted with , but it rose again because of , which significantly increased the protein content of . The species composition and diversity of epiphytic microorganisms also vary with different treatments. Proteobacteria is dominant in all the groups, especially in the Toxic_SMC group. In addition, bacteria that can degrade organic pollutants are more abundant in Toxic_SMC group. This study focuses on the defense response of induced by under the pressure of toxic or non-toxic and evaluates the changes to and its epiphytic microorganisms, which provides insights for the study of aquatic plant-algae integrated action systems in eutrophic or cyanobacterial blooms.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 02;6:22594 [PMID: 26932369]
  2. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 Jul 1;239:113649 [PMID: 35605325]
  3. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2017 Apr;98(4):556-561 [PMID: 28184984]
  4. Toxins (Basel). 2022 Aug 22;14(8): [PMID: 36006234]
  5. Chemosphere. 2019 Feb;216:203-212 [PMID: 30368085]
  6. Environ Pollut. 2020 Oct;265(Pt B):114997 [PMID: 32585551]
  7. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):1269-1303 [PMID: 29356270]
  8. Harmful Algae. 2022 Aug;117:102293 [PMID: 35944955]
  9. Microorganisms. 2024 Oct 09;12(10): [PMID: 39458344]
  10. Toxicon. 2020 Oct 30;186:151-159 [PMID: 32798503]
  11. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Dec;134P1:273-279 [PMID: 27643987]
  12. J Exp Bot. 2014 Jun;65(10):2585-602 [PMID: 24441762]
  13. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014 Mar;101:205-12 [PMID: 24507147]
  14. Environ Pollut. 2022 Sep 15;309:119781 [PMID: 35841988]
  15. J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Aug 1;: [PMID: 39087308]
  16. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):2328 [PMID: 30787483]
  17. ISME J. 2011 Apr;5(4):590-600 [PMID: 21048801]
  18. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jan 10;699:134325 [PMID: 31678882]
  19. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011 Sep;61(Pt 9):2238-2246 [PMID: 20952543]
  20. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001 Jun;52:363-406 [PMID: 11337403]
  21. J Environ Sci (China). 2014 Aug 1;26(8):1699-707 [PMID: 25108726]
  22. Front Microbiol. 2019 Oct 30;10:2474 [PMID: 31736913]
  23. Environ Pollut. 2020 Jun;261:114131 [PMID: 32066053]
  24. J Evol Biol. 2016 Mar;29(3):551-9 [PMID: 26663204]
  25. Neurotox Res. 2021 Feb;39(1):27-35 [PMID: 32683648]
  26. J Hazard Mater. 2021 Jan 5;401:123403 [PMID: 32659587]
  27. mSystems. 2022 Apr 26;7(2):e0122621 [PMID: 35229647]
  28. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2021 Jan 7;10(1): [PMID: 33414331]
  29. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Oct;132:123-31 [PMID: 27294671]
  30. Toxins (Basel). 2023 Aug 28;15(9): [PMID: 37755955]
  31. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(48):105084-105098 [PMID: 37740161]
  32. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016 Nov 28;9:260 [PMID: 27933102]
  33. Aquat Toxicol. 2015 Jun;163:130-9 [PMID: 25889089]
  34. Ecotoxicology. 2008 Aug;17(6):504-16 [PMID: 18389369]
  35. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023 Nov 15;267:115620 [PMID: 37866108]
  36. J Hazard Mater. 2020 May 5;389:122053 [PMID: 31978825]
  37. Harmful Algae. 2024 Apr;134:102623 [PMID: 38705613]
  38. Int J Phytoremediation. 2019;21(7):643-651 [PMID: 30676056]
  39. Toxicon. 2020 Mar;176:47-54 [PMID: 32103795]
  40. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020 Dec 17;533(4):770-778 [PMID: 32988585]
  41. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Oct;31(49):59058-59070 [PMID: 39331293]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0toxicnon-toxic-increasedbiomasssignificantlyinhibitedcolonycontentepiphyticmicroorganismsToxic_SMCgroupstudydefenseinducedeffectssystemsimulatedlaboratoryparametersrelationorganismsmeasuredexperimentformationpromotion14thdaysolublepolysaccharidedecreasedcoexistedroseproteinspeciescompositiondiversityalsovarydifferenttreatmentsProteobacteriadominantgroupsespeciallyadditionbacteriacandegradeorganicpollutantsabundantfocusesresponsepressureevaluateschangesprovidesinsightsaquaticplant-algaeintegratedactionsystemseutrophiccyanobacterialbloomsEffectsToxicNon-ToxicDefenseSystemCeratophyllumdemersumMC-LRScenedesmusobliquusalgalmicroorganism

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.