Regulating professional ethics in a context of technological change.

Tracey L Adams, Kathleen Leslie, Sophia Myles, Bruna Moraes
Author Information
  1. Tracey L Adams: Western University, London, ON, Canada. tladams@uwo.ca.
  2. Kathleen Leslie: Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.
  3. Sophia Myles: Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.
  4. Bruna Moraes: Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Technological change is impacting the work of health professionals, especially with recent developments in artificial intelligence. Research has raised many ethical considerations respecting clinical applications of artificial intelligence, and it has identified a role for professional regulation in helping to guide practitioners in the ethical use of technology; however, regulation in this area has been slow to develop. This study seeks to identify the challenges that health professionals face in the context of technological change, and whether regulators' codes of ethics and guidance are sufficient to help workers navigate these changes.
METHODS: We conducted mixed methods research in Ontario, Canada, using qualitative content analysis of regulators' codes of ethics and practice guidance (26 regulators, 63 documents analysed), interviews with 7 representatives from 5 health profession regulatory bodies, and focus groups with 17 healthcare practitioners across 5 professions in the province. We used thematic analysis to analyse the data and answer our core research questions.
RESULTS: We find that codes of ethics focus more on general principles and managing practitioners' relationships with clients/patients; hence, it is not clear that these documents can successfully guide professional practice in a context of rapid technological change. Practitioners and regulatory body staff express ambivalence and uncertainty about regulators' roles in regulating technology use. In some instances, health professionals experience conflict between the expectations of their regulator and their employer. These gaps and conflicts leave some professionals uncertain about how to practice ethically in a digital age.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for more guidance and regulation in this area, not only for practitioners, but with respect to the application of technology within the environments in which health professionals work.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 23;25(1):10 [PMID: 38262986]
  2. J Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 21;50(7):437-441 [PMID: 37607805]
  3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 13;18(1):545 [PMID: 30001717]
  4. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 27;10:1305756 [PMID: 38089864]
  5. NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jul 6;6(1):120 [PMID: 37414860]
  6. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):73 [PMID: 37081503]
  7. BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 22;25(1):74 [PMID: 38909180]
  8. Healthc Manage Forum. 2023 Mar;36(2):113-118 [PMID: 36421019]
  9. Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jun 4;30(3):24 [PMID: 38833207]
  10. PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0303192 [PMID: 38728239]
  11. BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 11;25(1):52 [PMID: 38734602]
  12. BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 16;25(1):55 [PMID: 38750441]
  13. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689 [PMID: 37740191]

MeSH Term

Humans
Ontario
Codes of Ethics
Ethics, Professional
Artificial Intelligence
Health Personnel
Qualitative Research
Focus Groups
Technology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0professionalshealthethicschangeregulationguidancepracticeintelligenceprofessionalpractitionerstechnologycontexttechnologicalregulators'codesworkartificialethicalguideusearearesearchanalysisdocuments5regulatoryfocusProfessionalBACKGROUND:TechnologicalimpactingespeciallyrecentdevelopmentsResearchraisedmanyconsiderationsrespectingclinicalapplicationsidentifiedrolehelpinghoweverslowdevelopstudyseeksidentifychallengesfacewhethersufficienthelpworkersnavigatechangesMETHODS:conductedmixedmethodsOntarioCanadausingqualitativecontent26regulators63analysedinterviews7representativesprofessionbodiesgroups17healthcareacrossprofessionsprovinceusedthematicanalysedataanswercorequestionsRESULTS:findgeneralprinciplesmanagingpractitioners'relationshipsclients/patientshenceclearcansuccessfullyrapidPractitionersbodystaffexpressambivalenceuncertaintyrolesregulatinginstancesexperienceconflictexpectationsregulatoremployergapsconflictsleaveuncertainethicallydigitalageCONCLUSIONS:needrespectapplicationwithinenvironmentsRegulatingArtificialCodesHealthcareRegulatoryTechnology

Similar Articles

Cited By