Are Activity Restrictions Necessary After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Sagar Telang, Amir Human Hoveidaei, Cory K Mayfield, Jay R Lieberman, Michael A Mont, Nathanael D Heckmann
Author Information
  1. Sagar Telang: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  2. Amir Human Hoveidaei: International Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  3. Cory K Mayfield: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  4. Jay R Lieberman: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  5. Michael A Mont: The Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  6. Nathanael D Heckmann: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Abstract

Background: There remains a lack of universal guidelines regarding the appropriate level of postoperative activity restrictions following total hip arthroplasty (THA). This systematic review aims to assess whether the liberalization of postoperative activity restrictions following THA impacts implant survivorship, return to sport, patient satisfaction, and functional health outcomes.
Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was completed across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using targeted keywords from January 1, 2010, to November 22, 2023. Inclusion criteria included randomized clinical trials, case-control, and cohort studies written in English. Data extraction focused on activity levels, rehabilitation protocols, implant survivorship, and physical and psychological outcomes. The primary search yielded 7420 articles, with 28 studies included after screening.
Results: Return to sports outcomes demonstrated notable variability (20%-98.5%). Most studies reported improved survivorship in high-activity patients. High-activity participants had all-cause revision rates of 0.9%-8.57% and aseptic revision rates of 0.4%-5.7%. Low-activity participants had all-cause revision rates of 0.7%-3.4% and aseptic revision rates of 0.0%-2.1%. There was no clear association between activity level and dislocation rates. Positive associations between post-THA activities and improved mental health and patient satisfaction were observed.
Conclusions: The current arthroplasty literature demonstrates that patients engaging in high-activity levels after THA exhibit similar or improved implant survivorship rates compared to patients participating in low-activity levels. However, high-quality prospective studies are needed to provide evidence-based guidelines. Patients should be encouraged to partake in activities at their own comfort levels with an understanding of their own limitations and risks.

Keywords

References

  1. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Mar;37(3):460-467 [PMID: 34902515]
  2. J Int Med Res. 2018 Jun;46(6):2104-2119 [PMID: 29098919]
  3. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1455-1460 [PMID: 30180053]
  4. HSS J. 2012 Oct;8(3):270-4 [PMID: 24082871]
  5. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):898-902 [PMID: 27889306]
  6. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan;39(1):54-59 [PMID: 37380140]
  7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):654-64 [PMID: 23817756]
  8. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Dec;24(8):1571-7 [PMID: 24664453]
  9. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997 Fall;13(4):575-88 [PMID: 9489250]
  10. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;75(2):e13806 [PMID: 33128841]
  11. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2022 Feb 28;19(1):7 [PMID: 35227191]
  12. Clin J Sport Med. 2019 Nov;29(6):451-458 [PMID: 31688174]
  13. Bone Joint J. 2014 Feb;96-B(2):181-7 [PMID: 24493182]
  14. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 Aug;28(3):509-20 [PMID: 22840311]
  15. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 24;10:857682 [PMID: 35402408]
  16. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Apr 16;6(4):2325967118763920 [PMID: 29707594]
  17. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed). 2020 Jul - Aug;64(4):251-257 [PMID: 32381395]
  18. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 May;26(5):550-6 [PMID: 26041645]
  19. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2850-2857 [PMID: 33875289]
  20. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Aug;50(4):383-93 [PMID: 24476806]
  21. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1990 Mar-Apr;128(2):139-43 [PMID: 2140643]
  22. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Jan 7;116(1-2):1-8 [PMID: 30782304]
  23. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Apr;92(4):814-22 [PMID: 20360503]
  24. Cureus. 2021 Sep 2;13(9):e17669 [PMID: 34646708]
  25. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3059-3065 [PMID: 33938986]
  26. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 10;10(20): [PMID: 34682767]
  27. J Hum Kinet. 2017 Dec 28;60:225-232 [PMID: 29340003]
  28. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2858-2863.e2 [PMID: 33926777]
  29. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3060-6 [PMID: 22535588]
  30. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015 Feb;31(2):107-13 [PMID: 25495877]
  31. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Mar;141(3):497-507 [PMID: 33258998]
  32. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Mar 3;103(5):446-455 [PMID: 33337819]
  33. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Jun;71(3):243-9 [PMID: 10919294]
  34. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898 [PMID: 31462531]
  35. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1502-11 [PMID: 24353051]
  36. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Dec;22(12):2051-8 [PMID: 25305374]
  37. Acta Orthop Belg. 2017 Mar;83(1):45-52 [PMID: 29322894]
  38. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):425-32 [PMID: 21993977]
  39. JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2127-2133 [PMID: 33038125]
  40. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 May 15;29(10):e513-e517 [PMID: 33002961]
  41. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Aug;(269):25-31 [PMID: 1864047]
  42. Am J Sports Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;30(2):163-6 [PMID: 11912082]
  43. Arthroplast Today. 2021 Aug 23;11:68-72 [PMID: 34471662]
  44. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Feb;22(2):171-5 [PMID: 17275629]
  45. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):555-61 [PMID: 22125250]
  46. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25403 [PMID: 21966520]
  47. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):120-6 [PMID: 19698910]
  48. J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 12;12(20): [PMID: 37892620]
  49. J Phys Ther Sci. 2022 Feb;34(2):76-84 [PMID: 35221508]
  50. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Dec;14(6):463-472 [PMID: 28898556]
  51. JAMA. 1996 Mar 20;275(11):858-65 [PMID: 8596224]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ratesactivitysurvivorshipstudieslevelsrevision0restrictionsarthroplastyTHAimplantoutcomesimprovedpatientsguidelineslevelpostoperativefollowinghippatientsatisfactionhealthsearchincludedhigh-activityparticipantsall-causeasepticactivitiesActivityTotalHipBackground:remainslackuniversalregardingappropriatetotalsystematicreviewaimsassesswhetherliberalizationimpactsreturnsportfunctionalMethods:comprehensivestrategycompletedacrossPubMedScopusWebSciencedatabasesusingtargetedkeywordsJanuary12010November222023Inclusioncriteriarandomizedclinicaltrialscase-controlcohortwrittenEnglishDataextractionfocusedrehabilitationprotocolsphysicalpsychologicalprimaryyielded7420articles28screeningResults:Returnsportsdemonstratednotablevariability20%-985%reportedHigh-activity9%-857%4%-57%Low-activity7%-34%0%-21%clearassociationdislocationPositiveassociationspost-THAmentalobservedConclusions:currentliteraturedemonstratesengagingexhibitsimilarcomparedparticipatinglow-activityHoweverhigh-qualityprospectiveneededprovideevidence-basedPatientsencouragedpartakecomfortunderstandinglimitationsrisksRestrictionsNecessaryArthroplasty:A SystematicReviewAsepticlooseningDislocationreplacement

Similar Articles

Cited By