Development and internal validation of time-to-event risk prediction models for major medical complications within 30 days after elective colectomy.

Janny X C Ke, Tim T H Jen, Sihaoyu Gao, Long Ngo, Lang Wu, Alana M Flexman, Stephan K W Schwarz, Carl J Brown, Matthias Görges
Author Information
  1. Janny X C Ke: Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID
  2. Tim T H Jen: Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID
  3. Sihaoyu Gao: Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID
  4. Long Ngo: Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  5. Lang Wu: Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  6. Alana M Flexman: Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  7. Stephan K W Schwarz: Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID
  8. Carl J Brown: Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  9. Matthias Görges: Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing colectomy are at risk of numerous major complications. However, existing binary risk stratification models do not predict when a patient may be at highest risks of each complication. Accurate prediction of the timing of complications facilitates targeted, resource-efficient monitoring. We sought to develop and internally validate Cox proportional hazards models to predict time-to-complication of major complications within 30 days after elective colectomy.
METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort from the multicentered American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program procedure-targeted colectomy dataset. Patients aged 18 years or above, who underwent elective colectomy between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019 were included. A priori candidate predictors were selected based on variable availability, literature review, and multidisciplinary team consensus. Outcomes were mortality, hospital readmission, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular events, pneumonia, venous thromboembolism, acute renal failure, and sepsis or septic shock within 30 days after surgery.
RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 132145 patients (mean ± SD age, 61 ± 15 years; 52% females). Complication rates ranged between 0.3% (n = 383) for cardiac arrest and acute renal failure to 5.3% (n = 6986) for bleeding requiring transfusion, with readmission rate of 8.6% (n = 11415). We observed distinct temporal patterns for each complication: the median [quartiles] postoperative day of complication diagnosis ranged from 1 [0, 2] days for bleeding requiring transfusion to 12 [6, 18] days for venous thromboembolism. Models for mortality, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and renal failure showed good discrimination with a concordance > 0.8, while models for readmission, venous thromboembolism, and sepsis performed poorly with a concordance of 0.6 to 0.7. Models exhibited good calibration but ranges were limited to low probability areas.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and internally validated time-to-event prediction models for complications after elective colectomy. Once further validated, the models can facilitate tailored monitoring of high risk patients during high risk periods.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05150548; Principal Investigator: Janny Xue Chen Ke, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.P.C.; initial posting: November 25, 2021).

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT05150548

References

  1. Ann Surg. 2005 Sep;242(3):326-41; discussion 341-3 [PMID: 16135919]
  2. JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 15;152(2):e164681 [PMID: 27926773]
  3. BMC Med. 2015 Jan 06;13:1 [PMID: 25563062]
  4. Am J Surg. 2019 Jul;218(1):131-135 [PMID: 30522696]
  5. Stat Med. 2011 May 10;30(10):1105-17 [PMID: 21484848]
  6. Stat Med. 2019 Mar 30;38(7):1276-1296 [PMID: 30357870]
  7. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Dec;4(23):461 [PMID: 28090517]
  8. Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1021-7 [PMID: 19917938]
  9. Am J Surg. 2017 Nov;214(5):804-810 [PMID: 28473051]
  10. Can J Surg. 2022 Nov 2;65(6):E735-E738 [PMID: 36323443]
  11. Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1465-1483 [PMID: 33848231]
  12. BMC Med. 2023 Feb 24;21(1):70 [PMID: 36829188]
  13. Arch Surg. 2003 Jun;138(6):596-602; discussion 602-3 [PMID: 12799329]
  14. BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2209 [PMID: 34593374]
  15. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):833-42.e1-3 [PMID: 24055383]
  16. World J Surg. 2018 Feb;42(2):533-540 [PMID: 28795214]
  17. Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun;25(6):1248-1256 [PMID: 36965098]
  18. JMIR Perioper Med. 2023 May 5;6:e45113 [PMID: 37145849]
  19. Med Care. 2005 Feb;43(2):122-31 [PMID: 15655425]
  20. JAMA Surg. 2014 Apr;149(4):348-54 [PMID: 24522747]
  21. Stat Med. 2023 Jun 15;42(13):2179-2190 [PMID: 36977424]
  22. Am J Surg. 2020 Jan;219(1):197-205 [PMID: 31128841]
  23. J Biomed Inform. 2020 Aug;108:103496 [PMID: 32652236]
  24. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Jan;29(1):27-37 [PMID: 30347497]
  25. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Nov;11(8):1217-1228 [PMID: 32414672]
  26. Stat Med. 1999 Sep 15-30;18(17-18):2529-45 [PMID: 10474158]
  27. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jan;210(1):6-16 [PMID: 20123325]
  28. Gigascience. 2022 Jul 30;11: [PMID: 35906887]
  29. Biom J. 2018 May;60(3):431-449 [PMID: 29292533]
  30. Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38 [PMID: 20010215]
  31. World J Surg. 2022 May;46(5):1039-1050 [PMID: 35102437]
  32. JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1401-1402 [PMID: 32167523]
  33. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1450-1460 [PMID: 32384334]
  34. Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):312-22 [PMID: 26501705]

MeSH Term

Aged
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Colectomy
Elective Surgical Procedures
Patient Readmission
Postoperative Complications
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Observational Studies as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0colectomymodelsriskcomplicationsdayselective0majorpredictionwithin30readmissionvenousthromboembolismrenalfailuren=Patientspredictcomplicationmonitoringinternallycohortyears1mortalitymyocardialinfarctionpneumoniaacutesepsispatients±ranged3%bleedingrequiringtransfusion8Modelsgoodconcordancevalidatedtime-to-eventhighMCBACKGROUND:undergoingnumerousHoweverexistingbinarystratificationpatientmayhighestrisksAccuratetimingfacilitatestargetedresource-efficientsoughtdevelopvalidateCoxproportionalhazardstime-to-complicationMETHODS:studiedretrospectivemulticenteredAmericanCollegeSurgeonsNationalSurgicalQualityImprovementProgramprocedure-targeteddatasetaged18underwentJanuary2014December312019includedprioricandidatepredictorsselectedbasedvariableavailabilityliteraturereviewmultidisciplinaryteamconsensusOutcomeshospitalcerebralvasculareventssepticshocksurgeryRESULTS:consisted132145meanSDage611552%femalesComplicationrates383cardiacarrest56986rate6%11415observeddistincttemporalpatternscomplication:median[quartiles]postoperativedaydiagnosis[02]12[618]showeddiscrimination>performedpoorly67exhibitedcalibrationrangeslimitedlowprobabilityareasCONCLUSIONS:developedcanfacilitatetailoredperiodsTRIALREGISTRATION:ClinicaltrialsgovNCT05150548PrincipalInvestigator:JannyXueChenKeDScFRPinitialposting:November252021Developmentinternalvalidationmedical

Similar Articles

Cited By