The impact of ultra-processed foods and unprocessed or minimally processed foods on the quality of life among adolescents: a longitudinal study from China.

Yuke Yang, Yan Gao, Xiangren Yi, Yining Hu, Liangyu Zhao, Lu Chen, Wenze Sui, Shuoqin Zhang, Sen Ma
Author Information
  1. Yuke Yang: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  2. Yan Gao: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  3. Xiangren Yi: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  4. Yining Hu: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  5. Liangyu Zhao: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  6. Lu Chen: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  7. Wenze Sui: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  8. Shuoqin Zhang: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  9. Sen Ma: School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between ultra-processed foods (UPF), unprocessed or minimally processed foods (UMFs) with the quality of life (QoL) in Chinese adolescents.
Methods: The study included a baseline survey in 2021 (T1) and a follow-up survey in 2022 (T2), with a total of 3,206 participants, including 1,510 males (Age ± SE: 13.62 ± 1.69) and 1,696 females (Age ± SE: 14.09 ± 1.85). QoL was measured using the Quality of Life Scale for Children and Adolescents. All adolescents were asked to recall the foods they had eaten in the past week, which was classified using the NOVA system.
Results: Instant noodles, sugary drinks, and fried foods had a negative impact on adolescents' QoL. Snacks or desserts only had a negative impact on the girls' QoL. However, processed meats had a positive impact on the QoL of all adolescents. Fast food was beneficial for girls' QoL. Fruits had a positive impact on the QoL of all adolescents. Green leafy vegetables, red and orange vegetables, fish, shrimp, or other seafood had a positive impact on the QoL of girls. Fresh poultry, pork, beef, and other meats had a positive impact on boys' QoL. Soy products were detrimental to girls' QoL. Tubers had a negative impact on boys' QoL. Potatoes had a negative effect on the all adolescents' QoL.
Discussion: This study further expands the understanding of the relationship between UPF, UMFs, and QoL. It provides new insights and evidence for improving the QoL of adolescents.

Keywords

References

  1. Public Health Nutr. 2007 Nov;10(11):1257-65 [PMID: 17391551]
  2. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 5;17(1):e0261446 [PMID: 34986194]
  3. J Sch Health. 2009 Nov;79(11):532-40 [PMID: 19840230]
  4. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024 Oct;124(10):1336-1346 [PMID: 38697354]
  5. Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Aug;46:101153 [PMID: 35809404]
  6. Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 11;12:1351510 [PMID: 38665244]
  7. Foods. 2019 Feb 01;8(2): [PMID: 30717139]
  8. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jun;9(6):373-392 [PMID: 34022156]
  9. Nutr Diet. 2018 Nov;75(5):488-493 [PMID: 29978549]
  10. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Oct;278(4):299-307 [PMID: 18592262]
  11. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Jun;9(3):270-7 [PMID: 19398906]
  12. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 15;13(5): [PMID: 37232654]
  13. BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1010 [PMID: 37254093]
  14. Burns. 2013 Mar;39(2):363-8 [PMID: 22975407]
  15. World J Diabetes. 2019 Jun 15;10(6):362-375 [PMID: 31231459]
  16. PeerJ. 2022 Jun 15;10:e13538 [PMID: 35726259]
  17. Front Nutr. 2022 Dec 22;9:1058190 [PMID: 36618694]
  18. Br J Nutr. 2023 Jul 14;130(1):83-92 [PMID: 36128619]
  19. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(1):138-47 [PMID: 18364339]
  20. Pediatr Obes. 2019 Jun;14(6):e12508 [PMID: 30690924]
  21. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Sep;24(13):4220-4229 [PMID: 33436138]
  22. J Nutr. 2022 Jan 11;152(1):190-199 [PMID: 34718661]
  23. BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 24;8(7):e022848 [PMID: 30042149]
  24. Nutrients. 2023 Oct 20;15(20): [PMID: 37892525]
  25. Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):1511-1524 [PMID: 33160572]
  26. BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2135 [PMID: 39107725]
  27. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):155 [PMID: 33569457]
  28. Nutr J. 2005 Sep 02;4:24 [PMID: 16138930]
  29. Nutrients. 2020 Jul 09;12(7): [PMID: 32660046]
  30. Nutrients. 2019 Mar 06;11(3): [PMID: 30845714]
  31. Maturitas. 2020 Jan;131:1-7 [PMID: 31787141]
  32. Food Sci Nutr. 2021 Apr 02;9(6):2915-2924 [PMID: 34136159]
  33. Br J Nutr. 2022 May 23;:1-27 [PMID: 35603426]
  34. Appetite. 2020 Apr 1;147:104546 [PMID: 31809812]
  35. Nutrients. 2021 Mar 10;13(3): [PMID: 33802066]
  36. Food Nutr Res. 2014 Jul 24;58: [PMID: 25140123]
  37. BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 06;17(1):933 [PMID: 29212483]
  38. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Feb;19(2):265-74 [PMID: 25866130]
  39. Nutrients. 2012 Jul;4(7):711-23 [PMID: 22852059]
  40. BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):e052278 [PMID: 35039286]
  41. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(24):6809-6820 [PMID: 33825582]
  42. Health Rep. 2023 Aug 16;34(8):3-15 [PMID: 37647458]
  43. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004 Jul-Aug;36(4):173-80 [PMID: 15544725]
  44. Qual Life Res. 2019 May;28(5):1271-1279 [PMID: 30656535]
  45. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):e083870 [PMID: 38955365]
  46. Nutr J. 2024 Jul 16;23(1):77 [PMID: 39010085]
  47. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;45:131-43 [PMID: 26911191]
  48. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Mar 30;18(1):43 [PMID: 38555430]
  49. Nutrients. 2020 Nov 11;12(11): [PMID: 33187190]
  50. J Nutr. 2002 Mar;132(3):430-8 [PMID: 11880567]
  51. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Dec;108(12):2066-70 [PMID: 19027410]
  52. Nutrients. 2024 Jan 18;16(2): [PMID: 38257178]
  53. Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:512-520 [PMID: 27825941]
  54. Nutrients. 2021 Apr 16;13(4): [PMID: 33923855]
  55. Nutrients. 2022 Jan 25;14(3): [PMID: 35276882]
  56. J Pediatr. 2009 Jun;154(6):807-13 [PMID: 19375714]
  57. Nutrients. 2018 Apr 05;10(4): [PMID: 29621144]
  58. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Aug;24(8):869-76 [PMID: 24795160]
  59. Nutr Res. 2022 May;101:14-22 [PMID: 35358793]
  60. Qual Life Res. 2008 Mar;17(2):257-65 [PMID: 18157615]
  61. Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 11;20:101203 [PMID: 32995146]
  62. Curr Dev Nutr. 2019 Oct 21;3(11):nzz117 [PMID: 31750413]
  63. Obes Rev. 2008 Nov;9(6):535-47 [PMID: 18346099]
  64. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug;21(11):2056-2064 [PMID: 29478427]
  65. Lancet. 2020 Nov 7;396(10261):1465-1467 [PMID: 33160551]
  66. Nutrients. 2023 Sep 16;15(18): [PMID: 37764788]
  67. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Nov 09;13(11): [PMID: 27834887]
  68. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;58(1):41-9 [PMID: 25958016]
  69. Public Health Nutr. 2009 Jun;12(6):739-47 [PMID: 18671890]
  70. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2013;83(6):355-66 [PMID: 25497779]
  71. Food Chem Toxicol. 2005 Feb;43(2):271-8 [PMID: 15621340]
  72. Nutr Rev. 2017 May 1;75(5):339-349 [PMID: 28475799]
  73. Nutrients. 2018 Mar 07;10(3): [PMID: 29518923]
  74. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):5-17 [PMID: 28322183]
  75. Nutrients. 2022 Nov 12;14(22): [PMID: 36432482]
  76. Obes Rev. 2024 Feb;25(2):e13652 [PMID: 37880814]
  77. Nutrients. 2020 Feb 28;12(3): [PMID: 32121152]
  78. Nutr J. 2024 Mar 20;23(1):36 [PMID: 38504300]
  79. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 6;18(1):213 [PMID: 32631401]
  80. Chin Med Sci J. 2022 Mar 31;37(1):60-66 [PMID: 35172918]
  81. J Burn Care Res. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):e244-9 [PMID: 23202878]
  82. Nutrients. 2021 Aug 10;13(8): [PMID: 34444899]
  83. Front Nutr. 2021 Apr 08;8:644650 [PMID: 33898498]
  84. Nutrients. 2020 Apr 14;12(4): [PMID: 32295142]
  85. J Nutr. 2010 Jun;140(6):1175-80 [PMID: 20392882]
  86. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Dec;51(6):1180-1186 [PMID: 37032457]
  87. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 13;9:581 [PMID: 30483164]
  88. Nutrients. 2018 Jul 26;10(8): [PMID: 30050006]
  89. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016 Sep;24(3):211-216 [PMID: 27743515]
  90. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;160(12):2222-7 [PMID: 14638594]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0QoLfoodsimpactadolescentsstudyprocessed1±negativepositiveultra-processedunprocessedminimallyqualitylifegirls'UPFUMFsChinesesurveyAgeSE:usingadolescents'meatsvegetablesboys'Introduction:purposeexploreassociationsMethods:includedbaseline2021T1follow-up2022T2total3206participantsincluding510males136269696females140985measuredQualityLifeScaleChildrenAdolescentsaskedrecalleatenpastweekclassifiedNOVAsystemResults:InstantnoodlessugarydrinksfriedSnacksdessertsHoweverFastfoodbeneficialFruitsGreenleafyredorangefishshrimpseafoodgirlsFreshpoultryporkbeefSoyproductsdetrimentalTubersPotatoeseffectDiscussion:expandsunderstandingrelationshipprovidesnewinsightsevidenceimprovingamongadolescents:longitudinalChinafixedeffectsmodelgenderdifference

Similar Articles

Cited By