Perceptions of teachers' responses to children's peer victimization: Agreement (and lack of agreement) among teachers and students.

Victoria E Johnson, Laura E Stanley, Wendy Troop-Gordon
Author Information
  1. Victoria E Johnson: Creighton University, School of Medicine, CL and Rachel Werner Center for Health Sciences Education, 2616 Burt Street, Omaha, NE 68178, United States.
  2. Laura E Stanley: Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation, and Counseling, Auburn University, College of Education, 3084 Haley Center, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.
  3. Wendy Troop-Gordon: Department of Human Development and Family Science, Auburn University, College of Human Sciences, 210 Spidle Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, United States. Electronic address: wpg0006@auburn.edu.

Abstract

Recent research has underscored the importance of teachers' responses to students' peer victimization as well as students' expectations for how their teacher responds to this victimization. However, little research has examined the extent to which teachers and their students have a shared understanding of their teacher's efforts, or lack of efforts, to manage peer victimization. This study addressed this issue using longitudinal data collected on 410 students (47.1% boys; 86.8% White; M = 10.29 years) from 26 fourth-grade and fifth-grade classrooms. In the fall and spring, students reported on their teacher's use of six responses to peer victimization and teachers completed self-reports of their use of these same six responses. Peer reports of aggressive behavior and peer victimization were obtained in the fall. Significant agreement among classmates was found for only three teacher responses, including contacting parents, advising independent coping (i.e., telling the student to handle it on their own), and suggesting avoidance, and there was little indication that there was greater agreement among same-gender classmates or among children either high or low in aggression or peer victimization. Overall, there was little association between teachers and their students as to the teachers' uses of the six response strategies. Based on these findings, fostering a shared understanding of the consequences and expectations regarding students' engagement in bullying should be examined as a potential target of anti-bullying interventions.

Keywords

References

  1. J Sch Psychol. 2008 Aug;46(4):431-53 [PMID: 19083367]
  2. Dev Psychol. 1999 Jan;35(1):94-101 [PMID: 9923467]
  3. Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):1048-70 [PMID: 8706509]
  4. Child Dev. 2022 Sep;93(5):1540-1558 [PMID: 35841302]
  5. Educ Policy (Los Altos Calif). 2018 Jun;32(4):507-539 [PMID: 29930440]
  6. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 May;44(4):691-703 [PMID: 26338225]
  7. Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Sep;29(3):336-348 [PMID: 25198616]
  8. Child Dev. 2016 Mar-Apr;87(2):593-611 [PMID: 26728135]
  9. Child Dev. 2008 Sep-Oct;79(5):1185-229 [PMID: 18826521]
  10. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011 Feb;39(2):225-38 [PMID: 20811772]
  11. Child Dev. 2010 May-Jun;81(3):837-50 [PMID: 20573108]
  12. Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;132(1):98-131 [PMID: 16435959]
  13. Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 01;11:592582 [PMID: 33335501]
  14. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:119-44 [PMID: 16903804]
  15. Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248 [PMID: 20640194]
  16. J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):239-61 [PMID: 24099346]
  17. Aggress Behav. 2012 Jul-Aug;38(4):298-308 [PMID: 23935227]
  18. J Sch Psychol. 2021 Apr;85:37-56 [PMID: 33715780]
  19. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;32(9):1643-1653 [PMID: 35348888]
  20. J Sch Violence. 2019;18(3):362-374 [PMID: 31462897]
  21. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):45-60 [PMID: 24362767]
  22. World J Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 22;7(1):60-76 [PMID: 28401049]
  23. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(6):843-54 [PMID: 23746108]
  24. Am Psychol. 2016 Nov;71(8):768-775 [PMID: 27977261]
  25. Dev Psychol. 2003 Nov;39(6):992-1004 [PMID: 14584980]
  26. Child Dev. 2016 Nov;87(6):1992-2007 [PMID: 27317628]
  27. J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Mar;52(3):547-560 [PMID: 36427160]
  28. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Jan;37(1):17-30 [PMID: 18584134]
  29. Psychol Assess. 2002 Mar;14(1):74-96 [PMID: 11911051]
  30. School Ment Health. 2022 Sep;14(3):709-723 [PMID: 37077431]
  31. Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 20;9:175 [PMID: 29515492]
  32. J Sch Psychol. 2020 Oct;82:49-69 [PMID: 32988463]
  33. J Sch Psychol. 2013 Jun;51(3):421-34 [PMID: 23816233]

Grants

  1. R15 HD089044/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Male
Peer Group
School Teachers
Students
Bullying
Child
Crime Victims
Schools
Interpersonal Relations
Longitudinal Studies
Aggression
Social Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0victimizationpeerresponsesstudentsteachersamongteachers'students'littlesixagreementresearchexpectationsteacherexaminedsharedunderstandingteacher'seffortslackfallusePeerclassmatesAgreementratingsRecentunderscoredimportancewellrespondsHoweverextentmanagestudyaddressedissueusinglongitudinaldatacollected410471%boys868%WhiteM = 1029 years26fourth-gradefifth-gradeclassroomsspringreportedcompletedself-reportsreportsaggressivebehaviorobtainedSignificantfoundthreeincludingcontactingparentsadvisingindependentcopingietellingstudenthandlesuggestingavoidanceindicationgreatersame-genderchildreneitherhighlowaggressionOverallassociationusesresponsestrategiesBasedfindingsfosteringconsequencesregardingengagementbullyingpotentialtargetanti-bullyinginterventionsPerceptionschildren'svictimization:AggressionStudentTeacher

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.