Subtype prevalence and treatment implication in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chamard Wongsa, Pakpoom Wongyikul, Piyaporn Chokevittaya, Anapat Nititammaluk, Kay Khine Soe, Phichayut Phinyo, Jonathan A Bernstein, Torpong Thongngarm
Author Information
  1. Chamard Wongsa: Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  2. Pakpoom Wongyikul: Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
  3. Piyaporn Chokevittaya: Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  4. Anapat Nititammaluk: Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  5. Kay Khine Soe: Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Manipal University College Malaysia, Melaka, Malaysia.
  6. Phichayut Phinyo: Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
  7. Jonathan A Bernstein: Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  8. Torpong Thongngarm: Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Abstract

Background: Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing regimens are the mainstay for treating asthma despite usually being ineffective in noneosinophilic asthma (NEA). Data on the prevalence of NEA versus eosinophilic asthma (EA) in mild-to-moderate asthma are limited.
Objective: We performed a systematic review of the prevalence of mild-to-moderate asthma in adolescents and adults using sputum inflammatory cell analysis and their responses to ICS.
Methods: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane) for studies in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. The primary outcome was the prevalence of asthma subtypes based on sputum inflammatory cell analysis, categorized into EA and NEA. The secondary outcome involved comparing asthma outcomes between different subtypes after ICS therapy. Certainty of evidence was reported for each pooled analysis.
Results: Eighteen studies involving 3,533 adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were reviewed. The pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval) of NEA was estimated at 40.39% (27.54, 53.93) in patients with ICS naive with very low certainty of evidence. On reevaluating sputum cytology, the disease of approximately 20% to 30% of patients initially diagnosed as NEA transitioned to the EA subtype. EA patients showed significant improvements in asthma symptoms after ICS therapy: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (standardized mean difference, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.30, 1.27), and airway hyperresponsiveness (standardized mean difference, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.29, 2.40). NEA patients exhibited limited response.
Conclusion: A high proportion of adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma were identified with NEA subtype disease, which exhibited a poor response to ICS. A thorough diagnostic evaluation before initiating treatment should be integrated into clinical practice.Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023484334).

Keywords

References

  1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jul;140(1):257-265.e11 [PMID: 28069248]
  2. BMC Pulm Med. 2013 Feb 26;13:11 [PMID: 23442497]
  3. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jul;8(7):671-680 [PMID: 32171064]
  4. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 May;119(5):1043-52; quiz 1053-4 [PMID: 17472810]
  5. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2016 Jan;7(1):1-7 [PMID: 27103553]
  6. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2021 Jan-Feb;11(1):22-31 [PMID: 33628717]
  7. Respirology. 2017 May;22(4):671-677 [PMID: 27899011]
  8. BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Apr 05;16:46 [PMID: 27044366]
  9. Thorax. 2010 May;65(5):384-90 [PMID: 19996343]
  10. Chest. 2006 Mar;129(3):565-72 [PMID: 16537853]
  11. Mediators Inflamm. 2004 Aug;13(4):285-91 [PMID: 15545060]
  12. Clin Transl Allergy. 2021 Jun;11(4):e12008 [PMID: 34161664]
  13. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000 Dec;30(12):1777-84 [PMID: 11122217]
  14. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 May;9(5):441-443 [PMID: 33577751]
  15. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  16. COPD. 2017 Apr;14(2):181-189 [PMID: 27983888]
  17. Thorax. 2002 Oct;57(10):875-9 [PMID: 12324674]
  18. Respirology. 2006 Jan;11(1):54-61 [PMID: 16423202]
  19. Eur Respir J. 2006 Mar;27(3):483-94 [PMID: 16507847]
  20. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 15;204(6):731-734 [PMID: 34129808]
  21. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;65(9):934-9 [PMID: 22742910]
  22. Respirology. 2012 Apr;17(3):461-6 [PMID: 22142406]
  23. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Mar;19(3):372-380 [PMID: 34793687]
  24. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(5):673-80 [PMID: 24245689]
  25. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021 May 11;17(1):47 [PMID: 33975625]
  26. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar 15;185(6):612-9 [PMID: 22268133]
  27. Front Res Metr Anal. 2021 May 28;6:685591 [PMID: 34124534]
  28. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):554-559 [PMID: 31558313]
  29. Respir Med. 2005 Feb;99(2):200-7 [PMID: 15715187]
  30. Lancet. 1999 Jun 26;353(9171):2213-4 [PMID: 10392993]
  31. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Apr;12(4):960-969.e6 [PMID: 38097180]
  32. Can Respir J. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):278-82 [PMID: 21969930]
  33. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):2020-2030 [PMID: 31112386]
  34. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  35. Thorax. 2005 Feb;60(2):100-5 [PMID: 15681495]
  36. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan 1;197(1):22-37 [PMID: 28910134]
  37. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):2009-2019 [PMID: 31112384]
  38. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul 1;180(1):59-99 [PMID: 19535666]
  39. ERJ Open Res. 2023 Mar 20;9(2): [PMID: 36949964]
  40. Eur Respir J. 2017 Oct 5;50(4): [PMID: 28982774]
  41. Eur Respir J. 2002 Dec;20(6):1364-9 [PMID: 12503690]
  42. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0asthmaNEAICSprevalencemild-to-moderateadolescentsadultsEApatientsreviewsputumanalysissubtypes95%confidenceinterval10corticosteroidnoneosinophiliceosinophiliclimitedsystematicinflammatorycellstudiesoutcomeevidencepooled4027diseasesubtypestandardizedmeandifferenceexhibitedresponsetreatmentmeta-analysisBackground:Inhaled-containingregimensmainstaytreatingdespiteusuallyineffectiveDataversusObjective:performedusingresponsesMethods:searchedelectronicdatabasesPubMedScopusEMBASECochraneprimarybasedcategorizedsecondaryinvolvedcomparingoutcomesdifferenttherapyCertaintyreportedResults:Eighteeninvolving3533reviewedestimated39%545393naivelowcertaintyreevaluatingcytologyapproximately20%30%initiallydiagnosedtransitionedshowedsignificantimprovementssymptomstherapy:forcedexpiratoryvolumesecond7930airwayhyperresponsiveness34292Conclusion:highproportionidentifiedpoorA thoroughdiagnosticevaluationinitiatingintegratedclinicalpracticeRegisteredPROSPEROCRD42023484334Subtypeimplicationasthma:SystematicAsthmaefficacyglucocorticoid

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.