Ethical considerations for respectful research participant payment processes.

Devan M Duenas, Elliott Mark Weiss, Benjamin S Wilfond, Stephanie A Kraft
Author Information
  1. Devan M Duenas: Seattle Children's Research Institute, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle, WA, USA. ORCID
  2. Elliott Mark Weiss: Seattle Children's Research Institute, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle, WA, USA.
  3. Benjamin S Wilfond: Seattle Children's Research Institute, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle, WA, USA. ORCID
  4. Stephanie A Kraft: Department of Bioethics and Decision Sciences, Geisinger College of Health Sciences, Danville, PA, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Background: Researchers and research organizations acknowledge the importance of paying research participants but often overlook the process of providing participant payments as a locus for improving equity and inclusion in clinical research. In this conceptual paper, we argue that participants' lived experiences and social context should be recognized and respected when developing these processes.
Methods: We consider how participant payment processes that require specific payment types, delay the timing of payment, or require sharing sensitive information may impose barriers to equitable research. Building on findings from empirical research of participants' perspectives on respect in research and a relational ethics framework of person-oriented research ethics, we explore how researchers and research organizations can better demonstrate respect through the research participation payment process.
Results: We propose five considerations for demonstrating respect when providing payment: (1) practice cultural humility, (2) be mindful of socioeconomic factors, (3) be flexible, (4) be transparent, and (5) maintain open communication. These considerations are intended to address the lack of existing ethical guidance around the process for participant payments and promote more inclusive clinical research. We provide a set of sample questions for research teams to consider how they could modify their payment processes to better demonstrate respect.
Conclusions: By better demonstrating respect for participants when providing payment, researchers can work toward ensuring that their research procedures are more inclusive, respond to the needs of diverse communities, and result in more equitable relationships with participants.

Keywords

References

  1. IRB. 2017 Jul-Aug;39(4):1-9 [PMID: 29038611]
  2. J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Spring;32(1):100-5 [PMID: 15152431]
  3. J Med Philos. 2004 Dec;29(6):665-80 [PMID: 15590515]
  4. Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Sep;41(5):2-15 [PMID: 31541538]
  5. Bioethics. 2011 May;25(4):209-19 [PMID: 19438444]
  6. Ethn Dis. 2019 Feb 21;29(Suppl 1):173-178 [PMID: 30906166]
  7. J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 6;: [PMID: 33023975]
  8. Medicoleg Bioeth. 2015 Jun 24;5:35-41 [PMID: 26807399]
  9. Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 11;12:734290 [PMID: 35222136]
  10. Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 May;52(3):9-17 [PMID: 35763201]
  11. Trends Mol Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):97-100 [PMID: 33277159]
  12. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 20;386(3):201-203 [PMID: 35029847]
  13. J Clin Invest. 2005 Jul;115(7):1681-7 [PMID: 16007244]
  14. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2019 Dec 19;13:2632352419885384 [PMID: 32215372]
  15. Account Res. 2018;25(3):170-197 [PMID: 29451025]
  16. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1998 May;9(2):117-25 [PMID: 10073197]
  17. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):766-771 [PMID: 29466147]
  18. Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Mar;19(3):175-185 [PMID: 29151588]
  19. J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 27;7(1):e58 [PMID: 37008619]
  20. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 May;37(5):780-785 [PMID: 29733732]
  21. J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 14;5(1):e159 [PMID: 34527298]
  22. Front Genet. 2021 Dec 02;12:734529 [PMID: 34925442]
  23. J Transcult Nurs. 2016 May;27(3):210-7 [PMID: 26122618]
  24. J Investig Med. 2014 Aug;62(6):851-5 [PMID: 24979468]
  25. Acad Pediatr. 2024 Mar;24(2):318-329 [PMID: 37442368]
  26. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 May 6;22(1):56 [PMID: 38711067]
  27. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(4):583-592 [PMID: 36533507]
  28. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;33(9):1197-200 [PMID: 26095131]
  29. J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Oct 03;6(1):e138 [PMID: 36590359]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchpaymentrespectparticipantprocessesethicsparticipantsprocessprovidingbetterconsiderationsorganizationspaymentsequityclinicalparticipants'considerrequireequitableperson-orientedresearcherscandemonstratedemonstratinginclusiveBackground:ResearchersacknowledgeimportancepayingoftenoverlooklocusimprovinginclusionconceptualpaperarguelivedexperiencessocialcontextrecognizedrespecteddevelopingMethods:specifictypesdelaytimingsharingsensitiveinformationmayimposebarriersBuildingfindingsempiricalperspectivesrelationalframeworkexploreparticipationResults:proposefivepayment:1practiceculturalhumility2mindfulsocioeconomicfactors3flexible4transparent5maintainopencommunicationintendedaddresslackexistingethicalguidancearoundpromoteprovidesetsamplequestionsteamsmodifyConclusions:worktowardensuringproceduresrespondneedsdiversecommunitiesresultrelationshipsEthicalrespectfulResearch

Similar Articles

Cited By