'God is always on my side': internal and external predictors of workplace bullying targets' help-seeking behavior in a religious context.

Mykolas Deikus, Jolita Vveinhardt
Author Information
  1. Mykolas Deikus: Department of Theology, Faculty of Catholic Theology, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  2. Jolita Vveinhardt: Vytautas Kavolis Interdisciplinary Research Institute, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Abstract

Workplace bullying is a pervasive issue that affects millions of individuals worldwide, leading to severe psychological and social consequences. This study examines the factors influencing the decisions of religious individuals who have experienced workplace bullying, with an explicit focus on their choice to seek help from their religious community. The study involved respondents from various religious groups, most of whom were Roman Catholic. The research employs a cross-sectional design, integrating quantitative analysis with qualitative insights. Data from 1,231 respondents were analyzed via descriptive statistics, correlation, regression, and content analysis methods. The main coping strategies identified were self-coping and seeking help within a close, trusted environment. Attitudes toward the religious organization (subjective norms) consistently predicted help-seeking decisions more accurately than access to religious counseling (perceived behavioral control) or personal values. This research provides one of the first empirical insights into how religious communities can actively mitigate the psychological impact of workplace bullying, offering a novel perspective on the intersection of faith and mental health. The findings suggest that religious organizations could be crucial in supporting victims by enhancing outreach and counseling services, contributing to a holistic approach to workplace well-being. These findings have significant implications for religious communities, highlighting their potential to support their members in times of active distress.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):244 [PMID: 35387644]
  2. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020 Jan;93(1):43-53 [PMID: 31342156]
  3. Violence Vict. 1990 Summer;5(2):119-26 [PMID: 2278952]
  4. Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 05;10:767 [PMID: 31024402]
  5. Stress Health. 2021 Aug;37(3):488-503 [PMID: 33277820]
  6. Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jul;160:35-42 [PMID: 27208669]
  7. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2021 May-Jun;27(3):189-202 [PMID: 33998326]
  8. Vet Rec. 2022 Oct;191(7):e2030 [PMID: 36002792]
  9. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2019 Mar;56(1):57-62 [PMID: 30911239]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;18(8): [PMID: 33920704]
  11. Occup Med (Lond). 2021 Dec 24;71(9):460-466 [PMID: 34537842]
  12. Qual Health Res. 2016 Feb;26(3):351-66 [PMID: 25568094]
  13. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007 Jul-Oct;30(4-5):340-54 [PMID: 17692375]
  14. Br J Soc Psychol. 1999 Sep;38 ( Pt 3):225-44 [PMID: 10520477]
  15. Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:702284 [PMID: 34621211]
  16. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  17. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jan-Feb;12(1-2):32-7 [PMID: 25852978]
  18. Violence Against Women. 2009 Jul;15(7):852-68 [PMID: 19458091]
  19. Eur J Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;16(3):357-383 [PMID: 33680188]
  20. J Clin Psychol. 2005 Apr;61(4):461-80 [PMID: 15503316]
  21. Prev Sci. 2020 Aug;21(6):749-760 [PMID: 32140825]
  22. Qual Health Res. 2013 Mar;23(3):291-301 [PMID: 23211611]
  23. J Interpers Violence. 2023 Oct;38(19-20):10703-10722 [PMID: 37226710]
  24. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  25. Can J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;65(8):577-583 [PMID: 32228305]
  26. Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Dec;59(12):1450-7 [PMID: 19033173]
  27. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Nov;111:103628 [PMID: 32932063]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0religiousbullyingworkplacehelp-seekingbehaviorindividualspsychologicalstudydecisionshelpcommunityrespondentsresearchanalysisinsightsmethodscopingsubjectivenormscounselingcommunitiesfindingssupportWorkplacepervasiveissueaffectsmillionsworldwideleadingseveresocialconsequencesexaminesfactorsinfluencingexperiencedexplicitfocuschoiceseekinvolvedvariousgroupsRomanCatholicemployscross-sectionaldesignintegratingquantitativequalitativeData1231analyzedviadescriptivestatisticscorrelationregressioncontentmainstrategiesidentifiedself-copingseekingwithinclosetrustedenvironmentAttitudestowardorganizationconsistentlypredictedaccuratelyaccessperceivedbehavioralcontrolpersonalvaluesprovidesonefirstempiricalcanactivelymitigateimpactofferingnovelperspectiveintersectionfaithmentalhealthsuggestorganizationscrucialsupportingvictimsenhancingoutreachservicescontributingholisticapproachwell-beingsignificantimplicationshighlightingpotentialmemberstimesactivedistress'Godalwaysside':internalexternalpredictorstargets'contextmixedtheoryplanned

Similar Articles

Cited By