Strengthening a Weak Link: Transparency of Causal Loop Diagrams, Current State and Recommendation.

Mohammad S Jalali, Elizabeth Beaulieu
Author Information
  1. Mohammad S Jalali: Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  2. Elizabeth Beaulieu: Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Abstract

Transparency is a critical aspect of systems science. While transparency of quantitative models has been assessed, transparency of their qualitative structures has been less scrutinized. We assess the transparency of causal loop diagrams (CLDs), a key qualitative visualization tool in system dynamics. We evaluate publications and a sample of most-cited comparable articles in other journals. We assess the inclusion of a plain language methods statement, overall discernibility of the methods, and identification of causal link sources. Reviewing 72 articles (: 36; other journals: 36), only 44%, 38%, and 25% fully satisfy each criterion, respectively. articles are characterized by higher transparency in the clarity of CLD development method and communication of causal link sources, yet the potential for enhancement is evident. We provide specific recommendations to increase the transparency of CLDs. Transparent reporting benefits original research authors, future expansion of CLDs, and the systems science community.

Keywords

References

  1. Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Jan 14;43(1):166-175 [PMID: 34505122]
  2. Elife. 2019 Jul 29;8: [PMID: 31355746]
  3. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 29;16(1):126 [PMID: 30594203]
  4. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4 [PMID: 25034198]
  5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142 [PMID: 31643080]
  6. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1 [PMID: 25554246]
  7. Brain Behav. 2019 Jan;9(1):e01141 [PMID: 30506879]
  8. J Environ Manage. 2019 Sep 15;246:27-41 [PMID: 31176986]
  9. Qual Life Res. 2022 Aug;31(8):2357-2366 [PMID: 35298735]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 15;14(8): [PMID: 28809807]
  11. Syst Dyn Rev. 2021 Jan-Mar;37(1):5-31 [PMID: 34230767]
  12. Syst Dyn Rev. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):481-502 [PMID: 33041497]
  13. Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5 [PMID: 26113702]
  14. Syst Res Behav Sci. 2022 Jul-Aug;39(4):734-749 [PMID: 36337318]
  15. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700 [PMID: 19622552]
  16. Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89 [PMID: 33781348]
  17. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6 [PMID: 26134548]
  18. Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):482-483 [PMID: 32355024]
  19. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Dec;8(12):e1459-e1460 [PMID: 33125915]
  20. J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 28;20(5):e10059 [PMID: 29807882]
  21. Psychol Med. 2016 Feb;46(3):551-62 [PMID: 26621339]
  22. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]

Grants

  1. R01 CE003358/NCIPC CDC HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0transparencycausalCLDsarticlesTransparencysystemssciencequalitativeassessloopmethodslinksources36recommendationscriticalaspectquantitativemodelsassessedstructureslessscrutinizeddiagramskeyvisualizationtoolsystemdynamicsevaluatepublicationssamplemost-citedcomparablejournalsinclusionplainlanguagestatementoveralldiscernibilityidentificationReviewing72:journals:44%38%25%fullysatisfycriterionrespectivelycharacterizedhigherclarityCLDdevelopmentmethodcommunicationyetpotentialenhancementevidentprovidespecificincreaseTransparentreportingbenefitsoriginalresearchauthorsfutureexpansioncommunityStrengtheningWeakLink:CausalLoopDiagramsCurrentStateRecommendationdiagramassessment

Similar Articles

Cited By