Differences in compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue among oncology nurses in Oman: A multi-center cross-sectional study.

Devakirubai Jacob, Joshua K Muliira, Eilean R Lazarus, Omar Al Zaabi
Author Information
  1. Devakirubai Jacob: Department of Adult Health and Critical Care, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.
  2. Joshua K Muliira: Department of Adult Health and Critical Care, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.
  3. Eilean R Lazarus: Department of Adult Health and Critical Care, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.
  4. Omar Al Zaabi: Department of Adult Health and Critical Care, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oncology nurses are constantly exposed to occupational exposure to the suffering of others, which can lead to vicarious traumatization, low professional quality of life (ProQOL), and inability to provide quality nursing care. The purpose of the study is to explore the ProQOL of oncology nurses working in Oman and the characteristics that lead to differences in compassion satisfaction (CS) and compassion fatigue (CF).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional design was conducted between March and December 2020 using the ProQOL scale to collect data from 242 oncology nurses in Oman using a convenience sampling technique. The rates of CS and CF [(secondary traumatic stress (STS) and burnout (BO)] were summarized using descriptive statistics. The characteristics leading to differences in CS and CF were assessed using the independent-sample -test.
RESULTS: Only 35% reported high levels of CS. Most nurses reported moderate STS (60%) and BO (65%). Nurses aged ≥36 years, ≥10 years of professional experience, ≥6 years of oncology experience, married, and desiring to work with cancer patients reported higher levels of CS.
CONCLUSION: Omani oncology nurses have low levels of CS. The nurses' desire to work with cancer patients, professional experience, and the age of cancer patients regularly affected the experience of CF. The identified characteristics can be exploited to mitigate deterioration in oncology nurses' ProQOL using targeted interventions for high-risk individuals. Beneficial interventions may focus on continuing education, stress management, coping, work environment, teamwork, and communication of oncology nurses and other members of the healthcare team.

Keywords

References

  1. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 May 1;46(3):338-347 [PMID: 31007264]
  2. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2020 Jul/Aug;37(4):265-277 [PMID: 32536320]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 10;15(12): [PMID: 30544672]
  4. J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):837-844 [PMID: 35729315]
  5. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Aug;35(4):348-353 [PMID: 31229346]
  6. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 Nov;60(11):1875-81 [PMID: 23840035]
  7. Oman Med J. 2019 Jul;34(4):271-273 [PMID: 31360313]
  8. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 Jan;43(1):118-20 [PMID: 26679452]
  9. Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Mar;55:100961 [PMID: 33434857]
  10. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(3):476-487 [PMID: 31808600]
  11. Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):44-56 [PMID: 34590791]
  12. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 May;17(5):682-753 [PMID: 31091199]
  13. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):851-855 [PMID: 32665111]
  14. Palliat Support Care. 2024 Feb;22(1):70-79 [PMID: 36472250]
  15. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):376-393 [PMID: 30797715]
  16. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 Sep 14;27(5):425-431 [PMID: 36524146]
  17. J Relig Health. 2022 Apr;61(2):1351-1365 [PMID: 34379256]
  18. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 31;19:22 [PMID: 32265998]
  19. J Adv Nurs. 2019 May;75(5):946-961 [PMID: 30397941]
  20. J Adv Nurs. 2022 May;78(5):1294-1304 [PMID: 34510523]
  21. J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):781-788 [PMID: 35624358]
  22. J Adv Nurs. 2018 May;74(5):1180-1188 [PMID: 29266380]
  23. J Trauma Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):160-9 [PMID: 25023839]
  24. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103472 [PMID: 31810017]
  25. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Dec 25;9(3):153-160 [PMID: 35494093]
  26. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2017 Jan/Mar;40(1):E16-E39 [PMID: 27525959]
  27. Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953 [PMID: 30350310]
  28. Aust Crit Care. 2019 Jan;32(1):46-53 [PMID: 29605169]
  29. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Oct 1;23(5):487-493 [PMID: 31538984]
  30. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1997 Mar;19(3):14-27 [PMID: 9055027]
  31. Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Dec;44:97-99 [PMID: 30389068]
  32. Mater Sociomed. 2021 Sep;33(3):179-183 [PMID: 34759774]
  33. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 Mar;31(2):228-243 [PMID: 29064289]
  34. J Clin Nurs. 2021 Mar;30(5-6):615-632 [PMID: 33205497]
  35. Palliat Support Care. 2021 Apr;19(2):129-134 [PMID: 33648612]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nursesoncologyCScompassionusingcancerProQOLCFexperienceprofessionalOmancharacteristicsfatiguestressreportedlevelsyearsworkpatientscanleadlowqualitynursingcarestudydifferencessatisfactioncross-sectionalsecondarytraumaticSTSBOnurses'interventionsBACKGROUND:OncologyconstantlyexposedoccupationalexposuresufferingothersvicarioustraumatizationlifeinabilityprovidepurposeexploreworkingMATERIALSANDMETHODS:designconductedMarchDecember2020scalecollectdata242conveniencesamplingtechniquerates[burnout]summarizeddescriptivestatisticsleadingassessedindependent-sample-testRESULTS:35%highmoderate60%65%Nursesaged≥36≥10≥6marrieddesiringhigherCONCLUSION:Omanidesireageregularlyaffectedidentifiedexploitedmitigatedeteriorationtargetedhigh-riskindividualsBeneficialmayfocuscontinuingeducationmanagementcopingenvironmentteamworkcommunicationmembershealthcareteamDifferencesamongOman:multi-centerBurnoutnurses’vulnerability

Similar Articles

Cited By